Who is the "duplicitous little maggot"? PS, DW or bothI'm guessing because the duplicitous little maggot bit the hand that was feeding him when he turned on Schofe.. Its one thing to have other jobs but when that main job involves calling into disrepute the one man that has been built on and up as Mr Family well, then you are attacking the whole network. How could itv trust him after that. ..The man after all is akin to the mucus that allows the slug to slither along.
I don't understand why you're saying you "can't deal with it" and seem to be suggesting surprise at pics/videos you're seeing on this threat...when it's you who is posting such stuff? You are aren't you, or am I mixing up posts? No-one else has put these images on here and Ttbh there seems to be a tenuous or little link to PS apart from one of the kids appearing on TM. Now you seem to be trying to stir things up and make people link them with this comment after you've posted a number of what I can only describe as disturbing and extremely strange videos that bear to relevance to this thread. Am I the only one who thinks this?You know what ? I can't process this . One minute I'm thinking "is it me or is Phillip Schofield fancying lactatia who is 9? Then I'm seeing drag dad's on BBC Scotland via "the social " (must watch ) and then I'm seeing drag kids joking about ketamine and rohypnol.
I come on here and I'm seeing adopted kids in dresses and gay men with coke or ketamine and David Walliams hastag boyindress .
I can't deal with it . It's too much .
So look. Im going to make a series of long films and I'll fold in as much as I can from here .
You can share them if you like and I'll just keep pumping them out.
It looks to me like they are rubbing society's face in this .
I guarantee you I can make videos that will put them on the back foot .
I never thought I would find myself here with you all, but I guess none of us do this for sport
Easiest thing is just to check my posts now and again .
It was more complicated than that. Barrymore's coming out seemed to be accompanied by a succession of deeply unpleasant and completely unnecessary misogynistic gestures and remarks that quickly alienated many who might otherwise have sympathised. There was also anger at his apparent lack of concern for his wife, not just because he'd cheated on her but also because as his manager she'd basically shaped his success.Barrymore came out in 1995, and by all accounts, the public responded positively
That's why sites like this are vital. Free speech on the internet means we can all talk to each other. Had Jimmy Savile been operating now, I reckon there would be exactly the same kind of denial from TV land, but a site like this would've turned up so many stories he'd have to be exposed.It took a year after his death for the stuff about Jimmy Savile to come out.
But really, what real evidence is there of a) wrong-doing and b) a cover up? It’s pure speculation and making the ‘evidence’ fit a theory.
I seriously doubt that there’s any fire, despite plenty of people creating smoke on here. I say that as somebody who was initially convinced by the threads.
It’s become an endless feedback loop of comments that say precious little other than repeating pure fantasy, and, frankly, it’s pretty tedious and nasty.
There’s free speech and then there’s smearing a person’s reputation without any evidence whatsoever. These threads have exercised the latter option and the only reason it’s kept going is because the servers are located abroad. This site is packed full of slanderous accusations that have zero basis in solid evidence.
I think PS is a prick but without proof you’ve all just piled on and it’s disgusting.
Wikipedia standard of crapness. This thread has finally descended into total Ickedom. Good luck with the ravings. I'm out.
It’s called hiding in plain sightOn today's TM, a group of young men were being interviewed about a west-end show they've written. Towards the end of the interview Phillip mentioned the fact that one of them performed in Dr Dolittle with him and then they showed a picture (the lad looked like was about 10 in the photo).
Not sure why I'm highlighting it other than I was a bit surprised because I assumed he'd have actively swerved this being brought up because of the rumours but he initiated the conversation.
Is he just really brazen or is it 'look see, I didn't do anything wrong cos I wouldn't DARE talk about this or show this pic if I had'?
If just one more young guy comes out of the woodwork to tell his story about his time with PS I’m sure this would be blown wide open. The story isn’t that he’s gay, it’s the young age of the boys he’s attracted to. Nobody cares that he’s gay, but we do if he’s grooming young teens. Also the fact a man heading to age 60 is on tiktok and other forums specifically used by teenagers should be addressed by his bosses. At best it’s odd, at worst sinister.Are we definitely sure there's an injunction? Those things don't last forever. I think it's more feasible the runner was paid not to sell his story. If an injunction was taken out to stop the story, why would PS have had to come out so quickly? He could have bided his time whilst the injunction was still active to sort it out. I think his exclusive story to The Sun was a deal he made to silence MM from any specifics - once that story was out, the papers would have had to abide by normal privacy/harassment laws in the way they do other public figures
this forum has been extremely friendly and accepting of peoples differing views. The main reason I've stayed with tattle is the lack of trolls and negativity. Thank you Saturn for speaking up.
That Byline Investigates thingy is all over Twitter and is clearly on a mission to find the Press accountable for phone hacking, so I guess its understandable that they would focus on that - but if they are going to investigate things other papers don't [as they profess to do] then they should also be looking at the grooming allegations.
There's a lot of fishy stuff happening.
Dan Wootton disappears from the Lorraine show and gets a show on Talk radio as Eamonn Holmes leaves Talk radio.
Dan had been reporting/tweeting about the toxic atmosphere at ITV and had mentioned Phil was unpopular with many.
Did he get sacked from 'Lorraine' for daring to bring the toxicity to our attention?
Probably.
WE ALL KNOW Phil coming in on his day off to make the big announcement was so he could get in there first.
Him announcing it before the weekend papers could - plus - doing it on Friday delivered the double whammy of ensuring Ruth and Eamonn had to appear supportive of him because of what his announcement was.
If they so much as made a murmur about him being a git in any way shape or form they would be pilloried and called homophobes.
So Phil played a trump card there.
Things do have a way of coming out via the back door though, so maybe this article coming out now to say what we all knew when it happened a month ago may be an indication that the back door is about to open.
This article tells us nothing we didn't already know, but there are a LOT of people 'out there' who will be hearing this for the first time, so it is getting the 'something fishy' to a wider audience.
Creak, creak, creak goes the back door.......................................
My theory is the toxicity stories (not limited to The Sun) were because journalists knew that PS had been seeing MM, knew that the relationship had gone sour and that MM was subsequently moved to Loose Women. They might have thought that how PS had behaved with MM and/or the relationship he had with MM was inappropriate, but they didn't have solid evidence to prove their relationship, so talked around it by saying how toxic PS was. They wanted to say he was a bad guy, without actually saying the real reason why they thought this. Note that The Mirror story about the runner leaving a toxic atmosphere was back in Dec and there have been many stories published by different media outlets since then. I've said in a previous post you have to question why it is important that a runner (in particular) leaving a programme is a story. They knew, they just couldn't say, so they just hint at a different level of relationship.I wouldn't have thought the Sun would be happy at him coming out on live TV ahead of the "exclusive" story his team had agreed with them. Surely they'd want the story to themselves and not for him to reveal it on national tV. Sort of takes the sting out of it doesn't it?.
If that was what they'd agreed, then they'd be looking for something better...and I don't mean being fed the sort of stories we've seen them running since he came out, clearly being supplied by his PR team. It just doesn't add up for me.
If the Sun had a better story surrounding him being gay, I mean with a bit more to it, then they wouldn't be happy with the watered down version of him coming out. While this probably came as a bit of a surprise to Mrs Cannybody sitting at home, it appears most people in the entertainment and media industry already knew. So the question is, what was the real story? It must have been pretty bad to force his hand. What I can't understand is what the Sun got out of it all...an old story after PS revealed all and a few crappy stories spoon-fed by his PR team. Mmmmm?
While I don't like the tactics of certain hacks, I think it's also wrong for celebrities to think they can lead double lives, conning the public and making huge sums of money through advertising etc. If their private life is the complete opposite of the squeaky clean image they present, then they really shouldn't be allowed to continue to con the public like this, often sitting in judgement on the lives of others they interview, getting financial gain from advertising based on that holier-than-thou image, and more worring hiding behind that image to win the trust of naive young men you are mentoring in the industry or meeting on chat sites. If this is the case, then it should be exposed. I don't think PS being gay is the full story.
I totally agree. This article just doesn't make sense. The Sun would want the story to themselves, not for PS to reveal it himself on national tv.They want to sell papers after all. There's a lot more to this than meets the eye.
PS's double life really alarms me and there should be an investigation. He's been living a double life all his life, using his wife as cover, she is complicit, and it involves at least one very young man. We are seeing a cover-up in action and I'm fumingPosts like this really alarm me. If you don't like someone vote with your feet and don't watch them. Don't try and rally the troops to crucify them.
Please could you tell me the "known facts" to support your claims?