She was on Monday's show and never said a word about it, maybe she was warned!What we need is Miriam Margolyes to go on This Morning and say to Phil, "and how's Mathew? ....
She was on Monday's show and never said a word about it, maybe she was warned!What we need is Miriam Margolyes to go on This Morning and say to Phil, "and how's Mathew? ....
HahaaaaWhat we need is Miriam Margolyes to go on This Morning and say to Phil, "and how's Mathew? ....
I've just read it on Google news. InterestingThere is an article on byline investigates about the PS outing. I did try to post a link but it has disappeared for some reason.
I absolutely agree, I’ve been trying to out an issue somewhere but the red tape around proof is a nightmare. Even whistle blowers need evidence.Regarding the people at This Morning covering up.........
I think they have to be very careful about what they say.
It's easy for us to say they are covering up - but suspecting something is very different from having proof of something, so they can't accuse someone of something serious like grooming without any proof.
The smart move would be to be patient and gather evidence.
Who is the "duplicitous little maggot"? PS, DW or bothI'm guessing because the duplicitous little maggot bit the hand that was feeding him when he turned on Schofe.. Its one thing to have other jobs but when that main job involves calling into disrepute the one man that has been built on and up as Mr Family well, then you are attacking the whole network. How could itv trust him after that. ..The man after all is akin to the mucus that allows the slug to slither along.
I don't understand why you're saying you "can't deal with it" and seem to be suggesting surprise at pics/videos you're seeing on this threat...when it's you who is posting such stuff? You are aren't you, or am I mixing up posts? No-one else has put these images on here and Ttbh there seems to be a tenuous or little link to PS apart from one of the kids appearing on TM. Now you seem to be trying to stir things up and make people link them with this comment after you've posted a number of what I can only describe as disturbing and extremely strange videos that bear to relevance to this thread. Am I the only one who thinks this?You know what ? I can't process this . One minute I'm thinking "is it me or is Phillip Schofield fancying lactatia who is 9? Then I'm seeing drag dad's on BBC Scotland via "the social " (must watch ) and then I'm seeing drag kids joking about ketamine and rohypnol.
I come on here and I'm seeing adopted kids in dresses and gay men with coke or ketamine and David Walliams hastag boyindress .
I can't deal with it . It's too much .
So look. Im going to make a series of long films and I'll fold in as much as I can from here .
You can share them if you like and I'll just keep pumping them out.
It looks to me like they are rubbing society's face in this .
I guarantee you I can make videos that will put them on the back foot .
I never thought I would find myself here with you all, but I guess none of us do this for sport
Easiest thing is just to check my posts now and again .
Looking at their site it's apparent that they are there to investigate the intrusion of the media into the lives of celebrities, politicians and sports stars; not to invetsigate the behaviour of said individuals. The same seems to be true of Hacked Off - https://hackinginquiry.org/ - who are working closely with the victims of press abuse.There was a tweet - disappeared now- asking Byline investigates about the Phillip grooming rumours and injunction rumours.
Their reply was "celeb stuff is 'not on our beat'"
Then a few days later they print the Poor Phillip was bullied by The Sun.
I agree. All this drag stuff is a bit ridiculous. PS looked taken aback during the Lactacia interview. That's all you can say about that really.Who is the "duplicitous little maggot"? PS, DW or both
I don't understand why you're saying you "can't deal with it" and seem to be suggesting surprise at pics/videos you're seeing on this threat...when it's you who is posting such stuff? You are aren't you, or am I mixing up posts? No-one else has put these images on here and Ttbh there seems to be a tenuous or little link to PS apart from one of the kids appearing on TM. Now you seem to be trying to stir things up and make people link them with this comment after you've posted a number of what I can only describe as disturbing and extremely strange videos that bear to relevance to this thread. Am I the only one who thinks this?
Completely agree!So - did he have a sexual relationship with an underage boy or not?
Did he groom the boy for years before or not?
All the Byline article tells us is what we already worked out for ourselves the moment the "coming out" was broadcast.
Completely agree!
These are the questions that need answering.
What we’d really like to know is ‘Has he committed a crime?’ If yes, then it’s a police matter and should be dealt with as such - along with any past misdemeanours. If no, then why the major cover up and super injunction?
Maybe it's a case of poacher turned gamekeeper? Stars probably need to have someone who knows how to play the game on their side, particularly if the sh** hits the pan. After watching the recent documentary about the death in MB's pool I'm shocked that ITV gave him airtime on GMB. I really feel for the dead man's family who believe their son was murdered that night. I have to agree, that after hearing about his internal injuries and how they'd probably been caused, that was no "normal" sex act. He must have been screaming in agony and I find it hard to accept that no-one at that party, either outside or inside the house, wouldn't have heard something. While his drowning may have been a result of the other injuries and not deliberate, the internal injuries probably caused that result. I doubt anyone could have consented to such actions to cause such horrific internal injuries, no matter how out of their head on alcohol and drugs they may have been. You also have to ask, what sort of person or people would do that to another human being. In my opinion this is a case of manslaughter at the very least and someone, if not everyone at that house, that night, must know what happened. I also wonder at what sort of person MB is and what his lifestyle is really like behind closed doors when he invites strangers he's "met" in a club, back to his house, where drink and drugs are involved. They are clearly the sort of people who think it's ok to sexually assault a man in the way that someone did that night. Either way, I don't think BM is someone who should be allowed back onto our screens. He needs to face up to some level of responsibility for that man's death at his home that night, no matter who caused it or how it happened. When you hear about his lifestyle, it makes you wonder what really goes on in the "hidden" lives of celebrities like BM and PS. I don't think they should be allowed to present a totally false image to the public on screen. They are not actors (though they'd probably make very good ones), but are presenting themselves as squeaky clean personalities, presenting day-time, family shows. This is why they kept their "real" selves hidden for so long after all. Broadcasters, like the media (newspapers) also have an obligation not to con the public, and the public has a right not to be lied to and tricked by the false fodder they're being fed.This is an interesting paragraph from the Byline Investigates article on the 'outing' of PS:
"Phil Taylor, Mr Schofield’s crisis PR manager is also facing unrelated claims of involvement in ‘unlawful information gathering’ relating to his 15 years working at the News of the World prior to his public relations career, during which he specialised in stories about another entertainer who was similarly forced out of the closet - Michael Barrymore. "
Ironic that PS should be using the 'instrument of doom' for Michael Barrymore to manage his own crisis. Is it a case of 'keep your friends close and your enemies closer'?
Full aticle by Byline Investigates - link below: