judgejohndeed
VIP Member
I know the Dan stans are going to shout at me for this but anyone else getting red flags that he found her? Why is this reminding me of Ian Huntley so much?
Yes, a lot of them do it. There's a fascinating science called statement analysis where they analyse truthful vs untruthful language, and the priorities of the person speaking, among other things. According to statement analysis it is stressful for the brain to lie and the truth usually leaks out in some way. Speaking in the past tense about someone who's not supposed to be dead is a major tell, but it's well-known enough that a lot of murderers try hard not to do this.I’m sure talking about missing people in the past tense is something that’s given other killers away before too - again can’t remember who though.
I think a lot of us think things about the McCanns that are probably unprintable.It really rubs me the wrong way when people who are in the news because of tragedy hire PR companies and act like celebrities.
The first time I saw this happen was with the McCann case, and what I think of them is probably something I should not print.
I know we all respond to grief and attention in different ways but I find it downright bizarre and it instantly makes me lose sympathy for people. Just seems so narcissists.
Been arrested?What’s happened to super sleuth Johara? He/she seemed to have all the answers
I agree. He’s lost his patience with the investigation and is craving the attention and spotlight on him by her body being found. This desire for attention, and the anger that still remains from whatever triggered him to kill her, is making him take unnecessary risks (‘finding’ her when he’s known where she was long ago), but he can’t help himself in my opinion.By miraculously finding her body.
To be fair sometimes it’s a way to protect yourself from media intrusion. PR companies might approach people to offer their services, when that person is literally being deluged from media and press from around the world. Unless you’ve been the victim of press intrusion it’s difficult to understand quite how vile and underhand they can be. They will ‘doorstep‘ you relentlessly, your friends, colleagues, anyone who might know you. Journalists can be horrendous in their pursuit of a story and sometimes to direct everything via a PR agency is an effective way of getting them to stop all the dishonest shit they try to pull on inexperienced people, as once they know you are represented they will often stop all the underhand shit because they know they won’t get away with it. I have a little experience in this area via an old PR job and I’ve ‘protected’ individuals by representing them if that makes sense. Often a PR companies objective is to keep individuals OUT of something (often completely innocent people!) as much as it is getting publicity so from that perspective I understand himWhen did Mr. Colegate hire the PR Company ? I find this absolutely bonkers - if I had a loved one lost on a mountain the LAST thing I would do is spend my time looking for a PR Company to hire !
Somebody mentioned Ian Huntley and they are right, it does have similarities, Huntley imposed himself on every part of the investigation just like this.
I want to see any evidence that the Police have said Mr. Colegate is in the clear - because otherwise I don’t see how he is not a ‘person of interest’.
I am a lurker mostly and appreciate the comments being presented here of different people's opinions and experiences and knowledge. I'm not sure why people wouldn't comment just because someone else may post a lot or have a different opinion. I'd personally be sad to see someone stop posting just because they felt the had to due to other people posting what I feel to be passive aggressive comments. Everyone is welcome to post on an open forum and whilst we may not all agree it is not anyone's place to make anyone else feel unwelcome.Everyone can comment, if you dont like what's written then keep scrolling. Its a fascinating situation and the analysis on here is what keeps me following it.