I'm furious!!!
Despite it upping their viewing figures I urge you all to watch the Sawalha-Adderleys review of the Emily Atack documentary so we can all discuss their reaction...
Their review was a cross between slagging off Julia, because she dared be concerned about their childrens sexualised behaviour online, and complete justification for their children's sexualised behaviour online.
In my humble opinion adults can behave however they wish (within the law) because they should understand that actions can have consequences and are entitled to dress and behave however they so wish...
They barely had the discussion about the main topic, they focused on their anger at people calling out their girls who when one was 11 and one was 14 were both teasing their 10k followers by provoking them with heinous videos of semi naked children doing everything children should not be doing.
Children, say an 11 Yr old who legally should not even be allowed on Instagram but who had 10k followers, certainly does not have the ability to understand consequences and should be safeguarded and stopped from behaving provocatively online!
The dictionary definition of Provocation is... "the action of arousing sexual desire or interest, deliberately"
The Sawalha-Adderleys CHILDREN have been on line behaving very provocatively for years! Hence why many people have called them out.
Mark calls it "Self expression" but thinks its acceptable that his children should be provocative online...
Mark Adderley also says "Rape is not an entry level offence"
He rants, that there is lots of evidence before it gets to that, stage, ie, flashing in an indicator of what's to come etc...
Excuse my memory tattlers but what was it Mark Adderley did to his friends mother when he was younger?
So much to discuss, the Sawalha-Adderleys review wasn't about the actual documentary, it was their rant at everyone who has called out their children from acting provocatively online, something that's completely different from Emily Atack, a grown adult, and the abuse she gets online.
I will ALWAYS call out children who are allowed to act provocatively online, children are precious, childhood is precious. When your role model is nadia sawalha, a women who strips off for kicks and attention, it is no wonder their 11 year old daughter was provocatively pouting, touching herself and trying hard to arouse anyone who was watching as it, was, behaviour she learned at home!!!
The Sawalha-Adderleys have over exposed their children on their shit show, let the world know where they live as they took no safety precautions before broadcasting their children to the world. They have led by the worst possible example, they failed to educate their children properly. Their father gleefully admitted sexually assaulting his friends mother, they condone their children stripping off, pouting, wearing sexualised clothes and desperately trying to arouse their followers all in the name of self expression!!! Wankers! Absolute useless sodding Wankers!
Your children, that's BOTH OF YOUR BLOODY CHILDREN, wouldn't be in therapy if you'd provided them with a normal childhood you despicable tw*ts... I don't know how thry dare rant about men lusting after women when thry have not only failed their own children but encouraged them/pimped them out to behave so sexually online!