Did she read it line by line? Like she read Georgia Church Suppers?
The bit that really upset me in the Guardian piece I linked is where Jack alludes to online threats: "One clean shot to the back of the head", because given the murder this week of Shireen Abu Akleh, it's just unbearable. I spend time here to distract me from the terrible things I can't do anything about, but today it's really not working. I'm not as observant as Mark Lewis but to quote a lovely frauIs the part about things agreement to ensure that KH kids won’t suffer even possibly true?
At the end of the day the most suffering they could have faced is their mother’s bankruptcy, losing their family home, and further tarnishing KH’s already bad reputation. All three of these things did occur.
The “I read it line by line” paragraph implies that she had some kind of control over the outcome. It’s just grandiosity, and virtue signalling in the most literal sense. She must have been worried about the concerns about KH’s children as a result of this trial, and was defending against potential criticism.
Costs £1.60 to make but costs £160 to cook it in the oven for 45 minutes.It's not going anywhere.
If it goes to court I will make and eat her pear chocolate cake. I'm that confident.
View media item 1282
Devious little twit for all thread titles, feck the swearing rule Yep she’s not wrong. But I’m hoping Laurence Fox uses all the receipts. He’s a nasty turd but I can’t see it going well. He’s more like a decaying toad than a butterfly.One thing I will say for the devious little twit is she picks her enemies carefully. She always goes for people who 90% of the country hates already.
Re: the Hopkins payment. In one hideously
So £24k didn't even cover 20 months of earnings as far back as 2018. Since then she has had some pretty big deals, more books etc yet hasn't earned enough to pay tax more recently?Re: the Hopkins payment. In one hideously self-pitying essay, Jack claims:
View attachment 1265549
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/2020080...2018/05/29/poverty-lingers-in-a-septic-wound/
I'm certain that at another time she claimed it paid for holidays (plural), but I'd have to dig out the receipts.
Thanks for the update. I skipped the last 20 pages “same tit, different day” scenario. Hope she is uncovered as a result of this.Thankyou x @Brian Butterfield for the thread title. There were quite a few in the madness towards the tail end of the thread so apologies if this isn't the democratically chosen one.
Wiki is the pink button up top. Thread title suggestions in the latter half of the thread only please. Use the words 'thread title' in your nomination and NO SWEARING.
PLEASE BE AWARE WE ARE CURRENTLY CHAOSING
She has accused Lee Anderson of libel (or slander, all legal terms are interchangeable) when he stated on GB News that she was 'taking money off some of the most vulnerable in society'. Now she is counting the views on the video and talking to her pro bono (or no win no fee - again, all interchangeable) lawyer in Israel to take them to court. Laurence Fox has got involved and even sent her a fiver after she announced people could contribute to her legal fees (for a court case that her lawyer hasn't even agreed to take yet) via Paypal. She is also already planning how to spend the winnings from her court case that hasn't been taken by a lawyer, let alone made it to court and won. The canal are thrilled as we planned our court outfits two years ago and we may finally get a chance to wear them.
If you are looking for the start of the chaos, it's this post in the last thread.
Thankspaceyou, I was looking for this.Re: the Hopkins payment. In one hideously self-pitying essay, Jack claims:
View attachment 1265549
Source: https://web.archive.org/web/2020080...2018/05/29/poverty-lingers-in-a-septic-wound/
I'm certain that at another time she claimed it paid for holidays (plural), but I'd have to dig out the receipts.
Jack only feels alive when she is in a crisis of her own making.For someone who is seemingly hanging on by a thread she sure likes to make life complicated.
It would take something and I mean something to make me take someone to court. I am a very just let it go Frau.
I just want a simple life, I can't be doing with the he said she said in my life.
She tried to do that with the JK thing but forgot that outside a small bubble most people don’t actually hate JK.One thing I will say for the devious little twit is she picks her enemies carefully. She always goes for people who 90% of the country hates already.
Jack is so thick, she can't see that the reason her name came up in that video was because they were confident of getting a reaction from her, allowing them to make use of her half million followers rage clicking their channel. She's so delusional and vain, she thinks they're all cowering terror going "oh no, we've made Jack angry, send helpos" when in fact they'll have been and counting the clicks. That she's threatened to sue them is a gift beyond their wildest dreams and if it actually goes anywhere (it won't) it'll be like a neverending Christmas for them. They have played her like a fiddle. At this point, she'd be as well adding Reclaim activist to her Twitter bio.For someone who is seemingly hanging on by a thread she sure likes to make life complicated.
It would take something and I mean something to make me take someone to court. I am a very just let it go Frau.
I just want a simple life, I can't be doing with the he said she said in my life.
Still 20 pages behind but Fox Mouldy isI think if she took this to court and a judge etc looked at it and heard barristers questions what have you.
The defence for Fox Mouldy could just ask her,
"You get a percentage of each book, if you sold X amount of books, your earnings would exceed the PMs salary as a minister?"
.
So he'd have to prove the claim or she wins, as opposed to her disclaiming it to win.
Either way... Where the patreon money and your tax Jack The Grifter.. stop stalking foggy victorian streets looking for scarves in puddles and leave the skips alone..