Thank you excellent summary.I have updated my post for some clarity...
I have been reading these threads for over 24hrs, with a short 3-4 hour break when I fell asleep. Finally registered in the early hours of this morning so I could fully contribute and say thank you for all your info and this is a basic summary of what I have learned from these threads
*PS is, and has been, gay for many years but the issue that upsets everyone is the blatant attempts by him and his cohorts and the media backing him to manipulate the public into believing this is a recent personal "discovery" or "revelation", despite its being known in the "business" for years that he's gay, and has no connection with the rumours of him being intimate with a much younger (teenage) person who he may have met at a theatre group he is patron of when said teenager was aged 10/11yrs. He also friended said teenager on social media when they were 15 and then "mentored" them through "menial" runner work at TM for a number of years. The same person then moved on to LW and was apparently sacked by ITV last week, just before the big"reveal", and their Twitter and media accounts, alongside the theatre they attendedcasca youngster on the Web, have disappeared. Not concerning or worrying at all?!?!
*PS has been snapchatting teenagers/young men for some years, illustrating a pattern a behaviour with a prevalence towards young looking guys. His language and behaviour shows a distinct concern in consideration towards his a middle to elderly aged man is addressing young boys. Grooming language or behaviour?!?!
*Rumours are rife that both PS and HW partake in the use of "Columbian Marching Powder" which may account for some of their "under the influence" behaviour at times (as well as possibly their weight control and unpleasant manner towards other people in more menial/less public positions), and not only effects from after the television award ceremonies. Obviously, other "stars" use and misuse non prescription drugs as well. What rankles is the presentation that these people are clean living and get to rain down hard on other poor people appearing on their programmes that struggle with their issues without the benefit of the "smokescreen" of hypocrisy and big finance that these people have.
*Almost all the presenters at ITV are represented by the same company, which explains why we see them on so many programmes and in so many adverts ad nauseum. This is like a "mafia" that runs a protection around them to prevent "unpleasant" and negative stories appearing in the press. This organisation seems not only to run their lives/relationships but also the public's, because it controls the information we get access to and thereby the decisions we make. There is obviously big money in this. I fell asleep. Finally registered in the early hours of this morning so I could fully contribute and say thank you for all your info and this is a basic summary of what I have learned from these threads 
I hope the truth gets told.
I’m so tired!
