Ahhhh, right. So the “it” (the tweet about donating) that she is/might be talking about that was up for less than a day is the follow up tweet immediately after the first beg, where she says she’ll donate the money if it turns out she doesn’t have a case. She then relies on this as the “as I have said I will do”, to imply it basically formed the T&Cs of the donation and no one should expect their money back, but
only if they’d clocked it within the few hours that it was up. Which is obviously a terrible explanation.
I think I get it now, although obviously the only rational explanation is indeed, WFK, and I Want To Stop, My Head Hurts. Send paracetamol-os
![Pill :pill: 💊](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f48a.png)
sorry for walloping on about it, I am just trying to apply logic to the buttered jelly of her grifty ramblings, and I just can’t make my head work like hers does! (Luckily for me, as this means I have gainful employment and functional relationships).