Ffs stop going on about Cameron. He's highly unlikely to be anything to do with this.
lest we forget her solidarity tweet in hebrewJeremy Corbyn - not that long ago she was doing her breaking news thing about him being suspended from the labour party? Obviously all the receipts will be on here.
Also annoyed at her doing the home school martyr act. Yesterday SB was having to parent her
I sense dino naps.
THe original recipient, Roadmum, called in on BBC Breakfast this morning, and it was wonderful to hear her calm yet deeply moving commentary. So glad they had her AND NOT JACK!I’m Grunka-ing again but came into real time in case this thread closed before I caught up .
Anyway. I know we’ve said it before but the nasty, rude, judgemental, untruthful persona she has on Twitter has been proven again to be fine when she can delete the responses and control the narrative but not so great when you have people there who can and will call you out.
Piers Morgan asked her if she had got to the bottom of why the box debacle had happened and she uhm-ed and ahh-ed and stuttered before saying she had and she hadn’t, it was something to do with money but she didn’t want to say it “in case she was sued”. Kevin Maguire from the Mirror was also on and he said outright it was all to do with profit, without hesitation.
Andrew Pearce from the Daily Fail said that he thought the Government thought if vouchers were not given out because people were buying the wrong thing. She was sickeningly nice while explaining the vouchers were age restricted so they “couldn’t even by a vegetable peeler”. Far cry from her Twitter response if it had been suggested there.
Piers Morgan wasn’t interested in her at all really which I think would have maddened her
Mouthy, arsey people are annoying and quite often horrible but it can be a wee bit more tolerable if they stand by what they say and have the same persona all the time. So many people would have seen her over the last couple of days and thought that couldn’t possibly be the Twitter mouthpiece.
Oh and she said she’d been up all night talking to parents through her Twitter DMs. I quite like that the original recipient of the lunch box put homeschooling her kids before talking to Sky News....
The bit in the spoiler of your post - I‘m so glad you said this. She’s doing a lot of other things at the moment that are even worse, but this is still damaging, and it’s important that it doesn’t get missed out amongst everything else.The woman is a chameleon. In the past year I don’t think she’s looked the same in any photos. Each one is completely different. Truly amazing.
Many articulate Fraus have pointed out before all of her skinny fishing. For someone that is meant to be so woke and so understanding of ALL of the issues, she certainly is dangerous when it comes to body image. With the very posed selfies, face tuning and how many tweets just tonight about how skinny she was. It’s quite irresponsible.
I’ve said it before but I’m still amazed that absolutely no consequences came from her raising £68k for a Kickstarter and not delivering what was promised, making no apologies and dragging it all on for TWO YEARS.
Tattle has a bad rep and almost all the threads i take with a pinch of salt but the Jack Monroe threads just pretty much contain tweets from Jack Monroe that get deleted so she can change her narrative. There is solid evidence of her lies - it’s not hearsay it’s literal tweets from her own mouth that suddenly vanish. Not to mention that there are some extremely intelligent people on this thread that speak sense, are wonderfully supportive of others and have taught me a fair amount (especially around food banks). It’s so easy to cry bully and trolls (and honestly influencers etc probably do have them - we know people are quite crap) BUT you can’t call someone a bully/troll/gossip when all they are doing is pointing out the hypocrisy of your own words, collecting receipts of actions and quite rightly calling you out.
Trouble is, usually she can delete them after and it's only ever us that remember they existed (with receipts of course ). But now, she's attracting all this attention she craves and many, many are watching and reading.It's the unprofessional tweets for me, I just love em
There was a Mumsnet post thought to be from the Dad's partner saying he paid maintenance and moved in with Jack to support her when he was a baby.Yes I hadn't thought of that! CB adds another £82(?) a month. As for child support, I think I read that SBs dad doesn't pay child support in return for having SB half the week but idk
It might well be the case that there is some corruption involved in the awarding of this contract, then again it might not. I hate to be a boring square but shouldn't we establish if there's any evidence to that effect. A far better line of attack might be questioning whether the private sector are the best people to be delivering school meals at all and that it might be more efficient and better for public health if it was carried out by the local authority instead rather than all these private contracts. Of course if Jack does have evidence of corruption then I'd suggest she tells a grown up rather than trying to break the story herself and making a complete arse of it. Also her obsession with failed PM and political irrelevance David Cameron is becoming alarming, the way she carries on about him you'd think he'd set up his shepherds hut in the back garden of the crappy bungalow.
It's fascinating isn't it? Not sure I agree that anyone has to demonstrate loyalty to Corbyn before they get to campaign on this issue, but this backlash is getting to something fundamental about Jack, which is her lack of integrity and her endless jumping on a bandwagon.Wouldn't it be odd if, of all the terrible things she's done, disliking Jezza Corbyn is the thing that brings her down.
It's okay if she didn't rate him. But the problem is she was, as always, mouthing off about things she didn't understand. She just jumped on the bandwagon of Corbyn hate.
Now, instead of saying why she personally didn't support Corbyn, (or God forbid, ignoring the squiggles' criticism), she's pretending it didn't happen, and that she's a fan of him and bezzie mates. OWN your opinions Jack. Or it just makes you look like a clueless, ignorant flake.
Interesting that they believe her not supporting him was because it would have rendered her career redundant. I don't think her Jezza hate is that deep (she's not intelligent enough to be thinking that way), but they are bang on the money about how she personally benefits from poverty.
omg is she finally being called out by left twitter? i never thought i'd see the dayA blue ticker has tweeted this...
You’re not eligible for child benefit if you earn over £55k per annum (I think? It may have gone up they were discussing it a bit ago).Yes I hadn't thought of that! CB adds another £82(?) a month. As for child support, I think I read that SBs dad doesn't pay child support in return for having SB half the week but idk
Thanks for the kind words.@MancBee - I just want to come round to yours for a cuppa, cake and a big natter. I always love your posts.
Who is it? If it’s a blue ticker you can spill xomg is she finally being called out by left twitter? i never thought i'd see the day