Um, It was always going to start up again. The food parcels were just to cover the gap.View attachment 386988
Bet you a pound she’s not.
Um, It was always going to start up again. The food parcels were just to cover the gap.View attachment 386988
Bet you a pound she’s not.
A whole pound! Fancy.View attachment 386988
Bet you a pound she’s not.
Well done Marcus and RM.View attachment 386988
Bet you a pound she’s not.
Sorry Blurst I must have missed this, but when and where did jack lay down that a breakdown was her reason for anti-Corbyn stuff? XSorry to be a head and to quote myself, but if her vocal anti-corbyn phase really was just due to a 'mental breakdown' then surely when Corbyn was suspended last year she would have been sure not to passively report it on twitter in a way that could be easily misconstrued? Perhaps she would have felt compelled to comment on it from a personal perspective? At least have the conviction to stand by your political stances, my god.
It comes from the vouchers they were giving out to replace school meals during the last lockdown. They were £30 for 10 days food. Jack has assumed that the £30 is now going direct to Chartwells because the idea of the government using hampers to mask a cut in spending is too far fetched to be entertained apparently.Where did the £30 cost originate from? Is this from the normal cost for having the meals in school? Whereby some of that will be the cost of paying the staff to cook the food etc?
like in a cafe a cup of tea costs £1 but in Jack monroe land the cost of a cup of tea is 2p because she works out the cost of a single tea bag.
Not defending the company here but they have their own staffing costs, if the £30 was directly given to the schools they would have to pay staff to shop and prepare them also.
I would love to know how she calculates her own work costs when she does her tax return (hopefully on time this year, you know like a good tax payer)
Last night! Classic manipulation here. Scary. Squiggle was making a perfectly valid point and has no reason to feel guilty or responsible for Jack's emotional state.Sorry Blurst I must have missed this, but when and where did jack lay down that a breakdown was her reason for anti-Corbyn stuff? X
Gina, just in case you read here, all of what you are looking for is at the bottom right hand corner of the website. Contact numbers, cookie policy, terms and conditions, the lot.
Is she implying she's said this in a live interview or in an article interview? I hope it's the live option, all the horrendous previous Cameron behaviour she's displayed will ensure she's cancelled. Or should, anyway. We know she squirms out of trouble by applying a victim persona.
bleeping hell. An ailment for every occasion. Someone must have bought her a nurses dictionary (very 60s thing we had at home) when she was 7!Last night! Classic manipulation here. Scary. Squiggle was making a perfectly valid point and has no reason to feel guilty or responsible for Jack's emotional state.
There's always a medical excuse to fall back on, isn't there?Last night! Classic manipulation here. Scary. Squiggle was making a perfectly valid point and has no reason to feel guilty or responsible for Jack's emotional state.
Christ Almighty, with what the Sidebar of Shame offers every day and all of the 'gram to peruse for leggings testing by fitness models, nobody needs to see grainy 12 year old mobile phone pictures of somebody working in a bar or the posed for a photographer crap we've already seen.She spoke about those bikini pics on the Instagram Live with Vix. Jack said she thinks they're worth a 'fair whack'.
And she has proof?
Oh my god she's so grim. I didn't realise going through a stressful period of your life absolves you of everything and anything. I'll bear that in mind next time I want to chat tit about people.Last night! Classic manipulation here. Scary. Squiggle was making a perfectly valid point and has no reason to feel guilty or responsible for Jack's emotional state.
You'd think that would be the point of priority for her (except that her only priority *is* her).This tweet irritates me the most (in this nanosecond) and shows that Jack is not arsed if kids get fed, she wants to bash some cooperate folk! Isn’t the bleeping point, that you’re missing, about feeding kids, you twanker!
View attachment 386988
Bet you a pound she’s not.
You didn't answer the question.