Chablis1
VIP Member
Have you see seen this?
Attachments
-
63.6 KB
I mean is it possible PC pissed off to Wales because he doesn't want to be around jcmh or be reachable by him and is leaving him to stew in his own juices. I think PC will have been devastated and embarrassed by his sons antics. It's not how the boy was raised. I think PC is licking his wounds.
I agree. He waited long enough. He can squeeze in a few years while William gets his bearings and then bow out gracefully.I think it's only fair Charles gets a shot. They can get him a Royal mobility scooter if he's having trouble getting about
Jesus, but I hate weddings where the couple strive to be "different" or cool. Two of my neighbours did the doves (well, pigeons to be precise. How we laughed) release thing and one had a carriage and horses. Need I add that both marriages ended in divorce within 2 years.Well, there were 2 florists at the wedding, the second of yesterdays wreath fame was in charge of:
"evening reception. “The flowers were divine,” said the source. “They were Meghan’s favorites and artfully arranged in glass jam jars and vintage jugs. They made the marquee look stunning.”
Now the above explains why she had licence plates with" classy girl" on them.
It's hilarious, royal guest surrounded by a stereotype of a rustic wedding, at the grand Frogmore House.
The Royal Wedding Had a Secret Second Florist for the Evening Reception
The flowers by Willow Crossley were “artfully arranged in glass jam jars and vintage jugs.”www.vanityfair.com
Is it just me or are the Australians handing Markle’s arse to her more than the Brits?
Seems various journalists in Oz and in particular Alan Jones (SkyAu) and this Spectator bloke Simpson are harsher than even Piers. This article written just prior to PP’s funeral hits the nail on the head.
You won’t be missed tomorrow, Meghan | The Spectator Australia
As members of the Royal family gather to mourn and celebrate the remarkable life of Prince Philip it is entirely appropriate that Meghan Markle should be ‘elsewhere.’ In this debased world of fakery…www.spectator.com.au
“As members of the Royal family gather to mourn and celebrate the remarkable life of Prince Philip it is entirely appropriate that Meghan Markle should be ‘elsewhere.’
In this debased world of fakery and self-styled celebrity, Meghan Markle is the High Priestess of her peers.
Woke, fake, deluded, utterly self-obsessed, obscenely privileged, ignorant of history and much else besides — describe her how you will — but be sure of this, Meghan Markle is everything she’d prefer us to think she isn’t.
What a demeaning, grotesque pantomime the interview with Oprah Winfrey was. Not content with her newly acquired $A20 million Californian mansion, Markle wished the world to know of her ‘deep personal anguish’ on entering the Royal household”
Markle was not merely marrying the Monarch’s grandson. She was marrying into an institution. A Royal institution which, by its own admission, is far from perfect and not without its significant blemishes. The institution is 1,000 years old. Markle’s declared ignorance of it does not make it any less significant or relevant.
In the event that the actor might actually read this short piece, the Monarchy is quite important to the conduct of perhaps the world’s most resilient Westminster form of government, democracy, our courts, the military and to thousands of community organisations which enjoy royal patronage of one kind or another. The institution is also a major employer, taxpayer, innovator, inspirer and contributor in a myriad of ways.
Among the astounding revelations by the actor was her total lack of awareness and appreciation of and or understanding of the history of the monarchy in the United Kingdom.
This reflects as poorly on her husband as it does on her. That Harry is not one for the books in no way excuses his abject failure or unwillingness to fully prepare Meghan for her ‘place’ within the royal hierarchy.”
“Let’s us not be in any doubt, the interview and its timing were intended to inflict harm on the Palace and its occupants. The consequence of her grubby efforts is a diminished Meghan and an even more diminished Harry.
Other claims made by Markle fall squarely into the minutiae all families face and should have been dealt with privately and sensitively. The co-conspiracy by her husband, despite all his privileges, reflects disgracefully on him too.”
And so much more .......
The original has Two people looking aghast at the way she looks close to dropping him, it's brilliant.
To be honest it's getting silly now.First ex wife , future ex wife. Both work for me.
PA reminded me of an emperor penguin with his chest puffed out. It just made him look pompous even if that wasn't the intention.How funny - yeah, I've got to get out the clippers for hubby's neck! Glad several people noticed how slobby H looked; I found it so disrespectful: ill-fitting and rumpled suit, distracted attitude and face/hair a mess. Someone here pointed out that as former military he should have shaved off the beard. Agree - and clip the hair! There's a photo of him with William in front (going into the church) - what a contrast.
On one hand, it's sad and alarming - often slovenliness is a sign of mental deterioration. But I read that H has always been sloppy, so despite the occasion he couldn't be arsed. Or doesn't know how to look after himself?
One thing to be grateful for is how fabulous all the other RF men looked in comparison (though I thought PA looked the least good).
This is something that blows my mind with both of them: the “I was so bored” aspect. Diana was sitting in the royal apartment bored out of her mind, when she could have been getting the best education possible. She could have learnt Welsh or study for a university degree. Same with Megan - self proclaimed that she knew “nothing” about the royal family yet she was locked in the cottage with nothing to do. Woman has you heard of the internet - the UK has so much history, the Royal family has so much history, hell even if she studied British pop culture that would have kept her busy for years. So yes both of them just wanted to fame part while being empty heads.Pretty sure the bodyguard she had an affair with had children too.
I can't remember who said it (maybe it was Lady C or another royal author) but Diana was a fame addict. That's probably one of the few things she and Harry's wife have in common. I think Princess Anne wasn't the biggest fan of Diana also.
I’m in agreement here - if he has the same long life genes as HMTQ and PP, then in theory he should get a few years in. I mean The Queen Mother lived to 101.I think it's only fair Charles gets a shot. They can get him a Royal mobility scooter if he's having trouble getting about
It's going to take much more than a former D-list actress to topple the monarchy.Daily Mail has this
Harry's Future ExWife... part of the new protocol of using HW (harry's wife) or HFW (Harry's first wife) instead of her name... cuz we are all just so sick of her and let's face it that is all she really is. That and a cuntBIB ...Apologies.... What is 'HFEW' an acronym for? I've checked the wiki/ google and I can't work it out! I'll probably kick myself when ye tell me