The Tim Tracker #43 It’s Jenn’s Show, Tim is just living in it.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Hmmmmm...Buying those likes and comments. They are truly pathetic!View attachment 808011
So, it seems interesting he's gone to buying comments over followers and I think I know why. There has been a shift in how media/PR departments view 'influencers' and why we are seeing more small channels. Let's say I have 10k subs, but my videos average 100 comments with 3k views. That shows my audience, while small, is VERY engaged in my content. Meaning if I put out a video about a dessert party, my audience will, most likely, be more interested in watching/talking about it.
Let's look at Tim's Disney Springs video from a few days ago: it's at 155k views with 336 comments. Yes, people watched it, but a majority aren't willing to go the 'extra step' to comment. He spent time buying views/buying subs and now it's showing in his comments not matching what 'should' be expected.
so, now he buys these bot level comments. the hope is that they get buried far enough down the page that a casual glance won't find them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
So, it seems interesting he's gone to buying comments over followers and I think I know why. There has been a shift in how media/PR departments view 'influencers' and why we are seeing more small channels. Let's say I have 10k subs, but my videos average 100 comments with 3k views. That shows my audience, while small, is VERY engaged in my content. Meaning if I put out a video about a dessert party, my audience will, most likely, be more interested in watching/talking about it.
Let's look at Tim's Disney Springs video from a few days ago: it's at 155k views with 336 comments. Yes, people watched it, but a majority aren't willing to go the 'extra step' to comment. He spent time buying views/buying subs and now it's showing in his comments not matching what 'should' be expected.
so, now he buys these bot level comments. the hope is that they get buried far enough down the page that a casual glance won't find them.
they clearly buy views and comments which is of course against YouTube terms of service. I wonder if they have received any strikes for it yet.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 9
they clearly buy views and comments which is of course against YouTube terms of service. I wonder if they have received any strikes for it yet.
Commissioner Gordon: are you shining the Bat Signal to call The Unwell Three?
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 17
they clearly buy views and comments which is of course against YouTube terms of service. I wonder if they have received any strikes for it yet.
I feel like if they had gotten a strike, Jenn would have gone BATSHIT. like she would make it everyone else fault and call on her army of 10 year old and 55 year olds to tell YouTube to remove it.
YouTube is useless in actually enforcing their rules. I also hate that you can block a user....and yet their tit still shows up in the recommended
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 9
Commissioner Gordon: are you shining the Bat Signal to call The Unwell Three?
LOL well YouTube does take three strikes for anything bad to happen 😂

i am generally not an advocate of letter writing and reporting unless it is an actual heinous offense like kiddie porn or violent offenses. Watching their channel implode of their own doing is far more rewarding.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
I don't think it's actually against the YouTube rules to buy views. I know you aren't allowed to promote buying views on YouTube.

If you do buy views then it says more about you as people really. Can you really feel pride in your accomplishments knowing that a lot of it is fake?
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
And the ironic thing is that these stans are probably OK with Gruden being canceled for the same thing. And they don't see the hypocrisy.

I just don't understand the stans' excuses that they were "young." They weren't teenagers (if they were, I'd excuse them for ignorance)

I'm sorry but late 20s and early 30s is not "young" in the sense that you don't know right from wrong or what you should or should not post on the internet. Tim was simply all about uploading and becoming the next Charles Trippy (one of his old idols, I believe), go viral, and / or be an internet "star" (despite Jenn saying in a really old video that they weren't doing this to be "internet famous").

Not to paraphrase Jenn, but I'd wager to say that 99.9% of us on here weren't saying such things or going to "urban" parties as "one chainz" at the age of 30. Most of us were too busy working, taking care of families, tending to homes, etc. to do that - and then post it on the internet for $$$$.



Yeah, that was one of the many phases of Tim. Which is a whole other thing. I never saw a grown man continually reinvent himself so much. No man - secure with himself - does such a thing. He's gone from the longer-haired country boy to mullet boy to a Rob Thomas lookalike to long-haired homeless-man look w/ scraggly beard to super skin and bones to cool hipster handlebar moustache to now Disney dad? So friggin strange!

Speaking of mullet, there's an old pic of Tim with a mullet holding a beer and I think he had on a Billy Ray Cyrus t-shirt? I can't find that one though!

NEVERMIND - Found it! ;)

View attachment 806992
That's one I haven't seen yet. Thanks for posting.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I wonder if being a season passholder for all of the parks is a requirement to be their nanny or do they provide her pass as a "perk"?
Idk why I see them providing the pass but keeping it under lock and key. Meaning they could only use with when "working"
 
  • Like
Reactions: 3
I feel like if they had gotten a strike, Jenn would have gone BATSHIT. like she would make it everyone else fault and call on her army of 10 year old and 55 year olds to tell YouTube to remove it.
From what I'm reading in the comments, the stans seem to be a bell curve of ages the maximum number of whom seem to be teenagers and young 20-somethings who have no clue how to deal with life yet, nor who have experience with raising a family. The rational part of our brains don't fully mature until we're 25-26. Totally makes sense that this younger group will be the ones who are expressing their undying love and support of the Slackers, declaring their lifestyle to be "goals".

The number of stans for each age group seem to drop off quickly the older you go. There are a few over 40 folk in there, but not many as most have the experience to know what T&J are pulling is moronic nor do they have the time to watch these idiots. Time is money for this group and they'll chose the better channels to watch. I doubt you'll find many 55 year olds watching them at all.

The retirement group, age 62+ such as that Ellen person are rare -- and indeed that woman is beyond special, probably pushed into retirement by the company due to an early onset cognitive decline.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Goodness the calibar of these stans... Not making fun of them because they are what they are, but it does give a glimpse into why they're so naive about the Trackers.

Who signs off on a comment... Its not a letter, we know it's you!!

Screenshot_20211013_154308_com.google.android.youtube_edit_1306060363805916.jpg


They don't care who you are, never mind who's computer you're using.
Screenshot_20211013_154352.jpg


Nope. Just nope.
Screenshot_20211013_154141.jpg


I'm confused, how the duck do you buy views/comments/subs?
There are sites. Knowing these 2 wank stains it's probably also part of the Nanny's job. Create multiple different YouTube accounts and comment on our content.
 
  • Haha
  • Like
  • Wow
Reactions: 11
I don't think it's actually against the YouTube rules to buy views. I know you aren't allowed to promote buying views on YouTube.

If you do buy views then it says more about you as people really. Can you really feel pride in your accomplishments knowing that a lot of it is fake?
it is definitely against the fake engagement policy. It is also probably why they Get very few legit sponsorships.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 7
it is definitely against the fake engagement policy. It is also probably why they Get very few legit sponsorships.
I think they also don't know how to actually try to get sponsorships.
Like, you have to reach out, show your numbers (growth/engagement/etc). I think they got "back doored" into a lot of the theme park media lists because the theme park PR people reached out to them years ago. so they know to call them, but not how to try and foster new relationships with brands
the fact that they got zero sponsorships for J$ backs up my theory I think. Hinting and tagging toy companies/clothing companies doesn't do tit.
It's like a job interview. You send them your stats, why you want to work with them, and what you feel you could bring to their brand.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
I think they also don't know how to actually try to get sponsorships.
Like, you have to reach out, show your numbers (growth/engagement/etc). I think they got "back doored" into a lot of the theme park media lists because the theme park PR people reached out to them years ago. so they know to call them, but not how to try and foster new relationships with brands
the fact that they got zero sponsorships for J$ backs up my theory I think. Hinting and tagging toy companies/clothing companies doesn't do tit.
It's like a job interview. You send them your stats, why you want to work with them, and what you feel you could bring to their brand.
yeah but their stats are garbage too. It is ridiculous they have been on YouTube as long as they have to still be clueless about sponsorships. It is really straightforward and pretty easy at this point. A huge part of the problem is G&T Gin&Twitter 😁 no marketing team wants to deal with that. Plus they don’t have a clear niche and have so many crap & offensive videos they are just not great prospects to be actual “influencers”
 
  • Like
Reactions: 8
yeah but their stats are garbage too. It is ridiculous they have been on YouTube as long as they have to still be clueless about sponsorships. It is really straightforward and pretty easy at this point. A huge part of the problem is G&T Gin&Twitter 😁 no marketing team wants to deal with that. Plus they don’t have a clear niche and have so many crap & offensive videos they are just not great prospects to be actual “influencers”
Yeah, she honestly should have deleted her Twitter years ago OR converted it into just a place to share the videos, but not interact.
She just can't keep her mouth shut.
They "fumbled the bag" hard. I think they are so egotistical to think that the people who started following because of theme park stuff would just transition to wanting to watch them be parents. They even suck as "theme park parents". The amount of potential content (what we thought we'd need v what we do need: diaper bag, what we've learned taking a kid to a theme park, No Stroller Challenge: is a stroller really more useful at theme parks?) they are literally running out of time to do. They could have welcomed in a whole audience of parents looking for tips to taking kids to the parks (there aren't a lot of BIG YT theme park vlogger channels like that), but instead they are bringing a nanny to the parks because they can't possibly be bothered to parent their kid at a theme park?
I really, really hope they don't have another one.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
This is a TERRIBLE angle.View attachment 807627


I'm still so fascinated by a couple with one child, neither of whom have actual FT jobs, who need a nanny to come out with them to parks. I hope she's getting paid enough. Does she get to sit in the backseat with J$ or does Jennyfaintlines make her sit in the front? Actually who I am kidding, they probably make her drive separately and don't even pay her for gas and mileage.

What even was the point of bringing the nanny? Jennyfaintlines was using her prop child for most of the vlog. "I need to borrow my child to put him on my lap during the show" and "I need to borrow him to get him to get free candy for me".
My thing is they have a nanny... and this... THIS IS WHAT THEY CAME UP WITH
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
Busch Gardens and Sea World are really in the "any press is good press" mentality with a lot of these morons.

I wonder if it was longer, but cutting around footage where you see the nanny took it to the oh so wonderful 13 min length.
Since, you know, they got called out during the Ratatouille video and they have to keep up the appearance of being the "loving parents"
What did I misdwith the ratatouille video. I stopped watching them months ago.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 1
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.