Oh no she's certainly not insignificant. She's been the catalyst for division because she is aware that she can play her audience.So true. The Lady Susan Hussey incident, Andrew's shenanigans, Jeremy Clarkson's nastiness...all thanks to Meghan. That dastardly Jezebel.
It's ironic how much her detractors invalidate her and insist she's insignificant while simultaneously ascribing so damn much power to this woman.
No she's completely innocent and misunderstood....The Royal family are all racists and persecutors. Off with their heads!Haven't you read the narrative, absolutely EVERYTHING is MM's fault
Dont be so bloody ridiculous.Isn't it sad how the Royal Family has suffered since the death of the Queen? MM has created so much sniping and division. What a pernicious "addition" she has been.
Blimey....A bit harsh? Why is there so much anger?Dont be so bloody ridiculous.
Any thoughts on Andrew’s behaviour? Or the queen paying off the victim of a sex trafficker? No? What a bloody surprise.
Absolutely...That's why it's all a Big Mess and everyone is having their say.MM/Harry AND Andrew are both very different, big problems. All 3 are differing levels of pieces of shit in different ways.
Youre comparing a pair of self obsessed airheads to a man who (allegedlyMM/Harry AND Andrew are both very different, big problems. All 3 are differing levels of pieces of shit in different ways.
She clearly says different and differing in her post so not comparing them no. Literally saying the opposite!Youre comparing a pair of self obsessed airheads to a man who (allegedly) had sex with a teenaged trafficked girl and was friends with a convicted sex offender? Seriously?
She said MM was the catalyst for division when, if anything, she is providing a human shield for all the terrible things the Royals have done ( sex trafficking/ bags of money/not paying inheritance tax and other tax avoidance) MM is pulling them all together so they can pretend to be happy families. Over the years, The Firm has managed to provide their own public disasters and divisions all by themselves. They weren't perfect up until 5 years ago!She clearly says different and differing in her post so not comparing them no. Literally saying the opposite!
They are both shitty, yup. Different levels of shitty. Andrew is undeniably 100x worse, but Harry and Meghan are also terrible people.Youre comparing a pair of self obsessed airheads to a man who (allegedly) had sex with a teenaged trafficked girl and was friends with a convicted sex offender? Seriously?
So much of this research has already been done. It’s why we briefly had sure start centres. The early years environment is a complete mess as it’s underfunded and I can’t honestly see what Kate’s foundation is going to be able to do about that. I have felt for some time that it risks a massive pr nightmare when you compare her lifestyle to those who work in the sector. I don’t think pictures of her with small children are worth the risk. But they plough on with it so what do I know?Last year she established her Royal Foundation Centre for Early Childhood and is supporting a study called The Children of the 2020s.
The research will track the holistic development of children from the age of nine months to five years old across England.
It will examine the many factors that affect a child’s development and education, from their home environment and community to early years services and the social and economic circumstances of their family.
What a lot to the charities they are patrons for need is funding. I wonder how much having quick photo in the papers actually benefits these causes.So much of this research has already been done. It’s why we briefly had sure start centres. The early years environment is a complete mess as it’s underfunded and I can’t honestly see what Kate’s foundation is going to be able to do about that. I have felt for some time that it risks a massive pr nightmare when you compare her lifestyle to those who work in the sector. I don’t think pictures of her with small children are worth the risk. But they plough on with it so what do I know?
That sums it up for me too. Of course Andrew is worse but I don't get why people bring him up as some kind of proof that Meghan was used to deflect from others. His case got plenty of coverage at the time but it's over now and he seems to be living like a hermit in Windsor. What exactly are the papers going to write about him that anyone would be interested in reading?They are both shitty, yup. Different levels of shitty. Andrew is undeniably 100x worse, but Harry and Meghan are also terrible people.
(Re Andrew I am appalled HMTQ protected him for so long but she was absolutely no saint nor a good mother. Now she is canonized.)
Agreed. But the idea that she is commissioning research really annoys me. We know a lot, but if you want to make a difference then the care and support has to be funded. I do get that it’s not her fault (or responsibility to do so) but linking up with a sector that seems so desperate for money and then having a luxurious lifestyle yourself and not making any financial difference seems likely to backfire.What a lot to the charities they are patrons for need is funding. I wonder how much having quick photo in the papers actually benefits these causes.
You do realise that things aren’t that clear cut, you seem to think it’s all one sided and all the fault of one person. Maybe they’re all a bit shiteNo she's completely innocent and misunderstood....The Royal family are all racists and persecutors. Off with their heads!
Yes, much is said of Charles' being devastated upon his parents' death. I'm sure he was but he also stated on a number of times his relationships with his parents weren't great.They are both shitty, yup. Different levels of shitty. Andrew is undeniably 100x worse, but Harry and Meghan are also terrible people.
(Re Andrew I am appalled HMTQ protected him for so long but she was absolutely no saint nor a good mother. Now she is canonized.)
He did say that. It seemed that he did manage to forge a much warmer relationship with his mother as time went on, though maybe not with his father. In itself that could lead to profound regret and grieving.Yes, much is said of Charles' being devastated upon his parents' death. I'm sure he was but he also stated on a number of times his relationships with his parents weren't great.
Well....who knows really? She's certainly caused even more division and instability and I don't think that can be denied?You do realise that things aren’t that clear cut, you seem to think it’s all one sided and all the fault of one person. Maybe they’re all a bit shite
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?