He set the cctv up .. he knew he was going to film it and post online ..
He set the cctv up .. he knew he was going to film it and post online ..
I think it would have been mentioned by the reporter by now if there was no defence solicitor.Missing my point - anyone legally trained would be representing him with a version that makes sense and not a version where he is digging his own grave. Which is why I assume he is representing himself
Lots of info here -what are usual sentences for this assuming he gets found guilty?
Georgia's statement is showing what a manipulative twit he is. Becomes more compassionate when she's showing distress over a situation he created. Absolute prick.
A 20+ year old rented rollsOmg he turned up in a rented rolls. Just when I think he can’t get more pathetic he outdoes himself
Lots of info here -
Sentencing guidelines for intimidatory offences published – Sentencing
www.sentencingcouncil.org.uk
I usually lurk on this thread.I think it would have been mentioned by the reporter by now if there was no defence solicitor.
He has already given his account under criminal caution. A solicitor can’t coach someone on how to get off of an offence (if they are guilty) as they would be complicit in their perjury. So, they need to go with what he said. They can do it while rolling their eyes though.
Life would be appropriate to keep him out of the press forever?what are usual sentences for this assuming he gets found guilty?
You would think so yeh! Surely rolling their eyes at each statement of bullshit. Each sentence contradicts the one previous.I think it would have been mentioned by the reporter by now if there was no defence solicitor.
He has already given his account under criminal caution. A solicitor can’t coach someone on how to get off of an offence (if they are guilty) as they would be complicit in their perjury. So, they need to go with what he said. They can do it while rolling their eyes though.
About £190 ,bookable onlineA 20+ year old rented rolls
Shouldnt be, but would allowed as he is effectively his own lawyerI usually lurk on this thread.
Surely he wouldn't be allowed to cross examine her if he was representing himself?
I would think that to be Danny .. he's not following him and seems to be blanking Stevo
Honestly they’d go for a drink together afterwards and say what an idiot the defendant was. They are just doing their job.You would think so yeh! Surely rolling their eyes at each statement of bullshit. Each sentence contradicts the one previous.
That's terrible. There should be some rule preventing that.Shouldnt be, but would allowed as he is effectively his own lawyer
Definitely. Danny doesn’t want to get dragged down by this given he’s successful in his own right. But unfortunately he egged Stephen on for years up to this point.I would think that to be Danny .. he's not following him and seems to be blanking Stevo