I missed the live as I was in meetings. She’s been reading tattle then
. I wonder if the kids are coming home if she is making them food?
![Smirking face :smirk: 😏](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f60f.png)
All she wants is social services to piss off
Good luck Shannon, they aren't going anywhere until you show abit of stability.. absolute twit. It's a shame she didn't word it 'all I need is my kids home'
She said ooo, who's gunna report me, run along to tattle and report me for slagging off the social workerI will do Shannon, IL let them know you still sit on live smoking drugs, waffling tit with cuts and black eyes..
The eyebrows do it for me every single time![]()
They may be coming for a visit? Or maybe they are coming home and that is why she now thinks it's safe to start slagging off social services and anyone else she believes conributed to her demise!!!I missed the live as I was in meetings. She’s been reading tattle then. I wonder if the kids are coming home if she is making them food?
Yeah they just " decided " to go grab two little children from their mum, cos they can!!!! Whilst she has this attitude it won't be long before they're gone again!!!Oh is that it? Hardly explaining the situation is it?! Of course they are lying Shann![]()
I missed it too thankfully!!!!! dislike her bloody self centred, opinionated attitude which her minions feed off....makes me sick and so angryAll she wants is social services to piss off
Good luck Shannon, they aren't going anywhere until you show abit of stability.. absolute twit. It's a shame she didn't word it 'all I need is my kids home'
She said ooo, who's gunna report me, run along to tattle and report me for slagging off the social workerI will do Shannon, IL let them know you still sit on live smoking drugs, waffling tit with cuts and black eyes..
The eyebrows do it for me every single time![]()
May I also add when children are placed in Foster care then social services do like to keep family life and Foster care separated so the children will not be visiting Shannon's home it will only be done in a contact centre until permission for outdoor contact is given.I'm new to this however I'm going to have my say, social services intervention with a family is usually done after three referrals from the public usually quicker if an authority professional e.g schools, doctors,hospitals makes a referral. There would have been meetings before they could even consider taking a child away from the home especially if there wasn't any involvement e.g cops back up or emergency court hearing however unless Shannon signed a section 20 which because she has done that in the past and got her children back that wouldn't be an option in this case as you can go and collect you're children at any point by ending the section 20 as it's voluntary placement. Usually children will be placed with family until a more appropriate place is found if the placement isn't the best for the children but it's OK for temporary care. Shannon at some point would have been taken to court for a interim care order to be made which gives the local authority 26 weeks to find what is best for the children but also to assess Shannon but what will also be taken into consideration will be the past details as to how the family became known to the local authority in the first place, whilst going through court Shannon will be given set days and times that she can visit the children in a contact centre which will be supervised she is allowed to take toys and clothes and food to the children whilst in family time there are no rules around however everything is monitored and reported right down to her appearance. It is very well known some not all social worker can say one thing and write in a report another and sometimes add extra on top of what actually is the truth however it can be questioned by Shannon if she isn't happy and has the proof to back up what has been misunderstood. But her lives and social media is not and will not be helping her if she is trying to get her children back. I hope this help people understand.
Please don't....yours and hairy's banter makes my day!!!!! Oasis is just a wind up merchant who thinks they're funny![]()
Thankyou for providing insight....hope her recent outbursts and " slagging off " social services hasn't gone amiss by them, cos, as I keep saying, like a broken record, whilst she's taking no responsibility for her actions and blaming others and " them" and calling them liars she doesn't deserve to have them back.....she needs a proverbial kick up the backside for her attitude towards them and also how she lives her life at the momentI'm new to this however I'm going to have my say, social services intervention with a family is usually done after three referrals from the public usually quicker if an authority professional e.g schools, doctors,hospitals makes a referral. There would have been meetings before they could even consider taking a child away from the home especially if there wasn't any involvement e.g cops back up or emergency court hearing however unless Shannon signed a section 20 which because she has done that in the past and got her children back that wouldn't be an option in this case as you can go and collect you're children at any point by ending the section 20 as it's voluntary placement. Usually children will be placed with family until a more appropriate place is found if the placement isn't the best for the children but it's OK for temporary care. Shannon at some point would have been taken to court for a interim care order to be made which gives the local authority 26 weeks to find what is best for the children but also to assess Shannon but what will also be taken into consideration will be the past details as to how the family became known to the local authority in the first place, whilst going through court Shannon will be given set days and times that she can visit the children in a contact centre which will be supervised she is allowed to take toys and clothes and food to the children whilst in family time there are no rules around however everything is monitored and reported right down to her appearance. It is very well known some not all social worker can say one thing and write in a report another and sometimes add extra on top of what actually is the truth however it can be questioned by Shannon if she isn't happy and has the proof to back up what has been misunderstood. But her lives and social media is not and will not be helping her if she is trying to get her children back. I hope this help people understand.
May I also add when children are placed in Foster care then social services do like to keep family life and Foster care separated so the children will not be visiting Shannon's home it will only be done in a contact centre until permission for outdoor contact is given.
To me she is either on something or drunk. She can’t keep still and just seems out of it. That really won’t help her at all. If anything it will work against herHer new videoThat really isn’t going to get her kids back!
Anyone else think she looks all over the place?
Complete bullshit.Her new videoThat really isn’t going to get her kids back!
Anyone else think she looks all over the place?
She really aint doing herself any favoursHer new videoThat really isn’t going to get her kids back!
Anyone else think she looks all over the place?
I might be way off here. But it seems like her “fight” has come maybe when there is a real chance of her losing them forever. Because she’s spent the past month drinking and doing drugs and has barely even mentioned the kids. Now all of a sudden she will fight and continue to fight? Calling social workers witches and c*nts is not very smartComplete bullshit.
Shan is not a good parent. She's selfish beyond belief. She smoked weed whilst looking after her children, she put men before her children, she verbally and physically assaulted her children whilst on live. She could not cope at all.
Then she lost her kids? Has she fought? duck no. She hasn't fought at all. She's got wasted, sniffed a tit ton of coke and smoked approximately 64647 spliffs. All whilst slagging off her son and social services.
Sort yourself out, Shan.
And people in her comments stop saying well said queen, say it louder for the ones at the back. Are you all deluded, she's potentially damaging her case by sharing this on social media when social services are currently responsible for her childrenWell who made Shan the spokesperson lol. That's definitely not the attitude to have when you are fighting for the return of your children, shes got to prove shes stable for a start and going by the last couple of months of videos and lives she's showing she's far from stable. Untill she can stand there and say yes I'm not ok and I need help, she won't get anywhere. She's telling everyone she's OK and doesn't need any kind of help, that's not what the majority of us see. You can't speak to your kids like tit, drag them about, and do drugs on live and expect no one to not report you. Then after losing them drinking excessively and still doing drugs, dancing and singing on live isn't showing anyone you are fighting to get your kids back
Most who are saying it are ones who have had social involvement or have had kids taken from them. Others are just so far up her ass they’re not thinking logicallyWell who made Shan the spokesperson lol. That's definitely not the attitude to have when you are fighting for the return of your children, shes got to prove shes stable for a start and going by the last couple of months of videos and lives she's showing she's far from stable. Untill she can stand there and say yes I'm not ok and I need help, she won't get anywhere. She's telling everyone she's OK and doesn't need any kind of help, that's not what the majority of us see. You can't speak to your kids like tit, drag them about, and do drugs on live and expect no one to not report you. Then after losing them drinking excessively and still doing drugs, dancing and singing on live isn't showing anyone you are fighting to get your kids back
And people in her comments stop saying well said queen, say it louder for the ones at the back. Are you all deluded, she's potentially damaging her case by sharing this on social media when social services are currently responsible for her children![]()
Looks off her face to meHer new videoThat really isn’t going to get her kids back!
Anyone else think she looks all over the place?
They all need to be pointed in the direction of CJ's thread on here. Read those court documents and then tell everyone that social services take children away for no reason. Then go back and watch screen recordings from Shan's live and tell everyone they've been taken for no reason.So many people in her live basically saying that if social workers aren’t parents themselves they shouldn’t be able to take kids awayIt’s not a job requirement for them to be parents
She's foaming at the mouth on last tik tok!!! She's on something ......she's a bleeping absolute disgrace......my blood is boilingTo me she is either on something or drunk. She can’t keep still and just seems out of it. That really won’t help her at all. If anything it will work against her
Maybe the kids have gone to their dads! She’s saying ss haven’t looked into her files to see what’s happened in the past and now social services haven’t protected her kids properly. That could have been the trigger to all this social talk….
Dick heads the lot of them .......and as for her....she's ofd her faceSo many people in her live basically saying that if social workers aren’t parents themselves they shouldn’t be able to take kids awayIt’s not a job requirement for them to be parents
![]()