PTWM #81 the one where she cashes in on another woman's mental breakdown.

Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Absolutely can't believe she called it a fiction book. It feels like the emperor's new clothes, everyone (outside of tattle) acting like the contents of the book's are actually made up by her 🤯
 
  • Like
  • Sad
  • Heart
Reactions: 10
What's her obsession with skanky Stacey? They are similar in a way, her 2 boys have to sleep in the annexe and golden child gets the biggest room and she never changes his nappy.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
  • Wow
Reactions: 12
He’s not yet 2. He doesn’t actually have the ability to be wilfully naughty. Literally. He needs guidance, boundaries and positive interactions not discipline at his age.
Nah he’s defo just naughty and coupled with no boundaries 😂
 
  • Haha
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I've added the following to the wiki:

In early June, Tattler @Lucyinthesky88 was able to receive an advance copy of Rachaele's new fiction book, which is due out in July, and shared some screenshots ( these can be found on thread 79, from page 44 onwards). Rachaele has attempted to write it in the style of her main character's journal, however it reads like a primary school child who has been asked to write an account of what they did on their holiday. In terms of plot, Rachaele's main character "Jo" is the mum of 3 children, who meets a man with 2 children and they all move in together to a large house near the sea (sounds strangely familiar 🤔). Unfortunately, Rachaele has used this as an opportunity to write the story of her stepsons and their mother, with names changed (mostly to the names of people she knows, such as Jo, Laura etc) to be able to pass as "fiction". As well as being very badly written (switching around from present to past tense and back again, overuse of certain words and phrases that are part of Rachaele's usual repertoire etc), the character of "Laura" (the mum of the stepchildren) is portrayed as being an alcoholic with severe mental health problems. However, despite Rachaele being an ambassador for Trevi House, she paints this character as a terrible person, and referred to her as "broken", as well as insinuating that having mental health problems and needing support/medication/hospitalisation makes someone a bad person. Some of the situations and events that take place in the book are directly influenced by things that are known to have happened in real life. The main character "Jo" is only ever concerned about how things impact on her, which funnily enough is exactly how Rachaele herself sees everything.
 
  • Like
  • Heart
  • Sad
Reactions: 64
Is she ill?
Getting Edie to read that book?
She shouldn’t be anywhere near, it’s bleeping traumatic. Imagine if her curiosity got the better of her and she thought next week when they are away ‘I’ll just have a read.’ None of the kids should read that! Did she get Edie to read it as a human shield so no one commented on the post what a disgrace she is? What’s wrong with them?

ETA: Josh doesn’t ‘help’ you in your career either Rachael. He is an aide and abet to you emotionally mugging everyone in your life for your own monetary gain. Nothing more, nothing less
 
Last edited:
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 36
Nah he’s defo just naughty and coupled with no boundaries 😂
Nah he’s really not. Children of his age lack the capacity to be wilfully naughty. It is completely pointless to discipline kids under 2, sometimes older, as, developmentally, they have absolutely no concept of consequences.
 
  • Like
  • Haha
Reactions: 18
Is she ill?
Getting Edie to read that book?
She shouldn’t be anywhere near, it’s bleeping traumatic. Imagine if her curiosity got the better of her and she thought next week when they are away ‘I’ll just have a read.’ None of the kids should read that! Did she get Edie to read it as a human shield so no one commented on the post what a disgrace she is? What’s wrong with them?

ETA: Josh doesn’t ‘help’ you in your career either Rachael. He is an aide and abet to you emotionally mugging everyone in your life for your own monetary gain. Nothing more, nothing less
Totally inappropriate to have a 7 year old reading something with so much swearing in.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
I don't actually remember her mate Astrid posting she hers either. It's not compulsory to take the what seems obligatory post vaccine shot. Bit considering she will post a pic of a turd for content, you would think this would be perfect content material. But maybe they are one of those crazy anti covid conspirators 🤷‍♀️


My work daughter is 25 & having hers today
I guarantee loads of her followers will be covid deniers and anti vaxxers, she fits in that demographic so even if shhe did get the vaccine she won't say anything for risk of alienating them
 
  • Like
Reactions: 15
Totally inappropriate to have a 7 year old reading something with so much swearing in.
The swearing isn’t really my problem, it’s the fact that the characters are easily recognisable and at 7 years old, Edie will be swamped with the god awful story of the situation she was born into. It’s unthinkable that Rachael wrote it, but to unleash onto the kids is horrific
 
  • Like
Reactions: 14
She’s definitely going on the Poverty Porn Tour next week with Jordan hahahaha. I wondered why she was all coy saying a ‘good friend of mine.’

How dysfunctional that Josh has to go with her and not stay at home for the kids that evidently badly need a parent at the moment. What kind of marriage is that?
That's absolutely bizarre. Wonder if she's trying to get closer to jordan so Emily can't have him as a BFF
 
  • Like
Reactions: 6
The swearing isn’t really my problem, it’s the fact that the characters are easily recognisable and at 7 years old, Edie will be swamped with the god awful story of the situation she was born into. It’s unthinkable that Rachael wrote it, but to unleash onto the kids is horrific
Bad enough that’s she just read that her mum never knew what love was until she met Wilby’s dad…
 
  • Like
  • Wow
  • Angry
Reactions: 25
The swearing isn’t really my problem, it’s the fact that the characters are easily recognisable and at 7 years old, Edie will be swamped with the god awful story of the situation she was born into. It’s unthinkable that Rachael wrote it, but to unleash onto the kids is horrific
Even putting aside that it's literally the story of her stepbrothers' past, it's written as a book for adults. I would not want my teenager reading something with those themes. Apart from being an absolute pile of shite, it's not an appropriate book for a 7 year old to be reading.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 18
Have they definitely reached her age group in her area? (Know there are locals here who can confirm). Because if they have then I’d say with 99.9% certainty she hasn’t had it, which just about sums her up.
I am not quite on her area of Devon but we have reached it here
 
  • Like
Reactions: 2
I am not quite on her area of Devon but we have reached it here
Thank you, and to those others who’ve replied confirming the vaccine is available for R in her area, so I think we can now safely say that neither she nor Josh have had it. Let’s hope Josh’s mum and everyone else of age they come into contact with has had it, seeing as R is about to go swanning around the country potentially into Delta hotspots.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 12
She didn’t really volunteer for Nina so much as use her premises to film tit and make herself look like a better person.

63DD42C0-EC52-4DF2-95D2-E152435BFB8A.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Angry
Reactions: 18
Even putting aside that it's literally the story of her stepbrothers' past, it's written as a book for adults. I would not want my teenager reading something with those themes. Apart from being an absolute pile of shite, it's not an appropriate book for a 7 year old to be reading.
How does no one in their life say anything? It’s literally blowing my mind that no one speaks up. To the point where I’m thinking have I missed something and got this completely wrong and she hasn’t done what I think she’s done? Or maybe Sam, Seb & Issac gave their permission or something?
I just can’t believe no one says anything 💆🏻‍♀️
 
  • Like
Reactions: 13
Yes, I know. But some areas are further forward than others, and even different surgeries in the same health trust are running on different timelines. That’s why I was just wondering if they were behind down there. Obviously they’d be quite a way behind for her not to have been called yet.
Here Me, my partner and sister have had our first jabs weeks ago (we’re 28-32) because we’re registered to the same doctors. They were just announcing 38 year olds could go for theirs. My sisters bf is 29 hasn’t had his yet. Only 10 miles difference between us. It’s all very different depending where you are.
 
I wonder who they’ve got round today. Shame they can’t just spend a weekend doing things their kids enjoy seeing as they’re about to duck off without them for another week.

1A9B1737-5D7E-4A92-AB88-059DEEED06F5.jpeg
 
  • Like
  • Sick
  • Angry
Reactions: 16
Status
Thread locked. We start a new thread when they have over 1000 posts, click the blue button to see all threads for this topic and find the latest open thread.