I agree, it worries me people saying they're using it for work, I wonder whether their employers know and would mind...because anything remotely commercially sensitive should not be going on there in any form, nor any confidential government work etc.
The example someone gave about using it for homework is also stupid. ChatGPT makes up sources. If you try to use it for legal research purposes for example, it has been shown to literally create cases that don't exist to provide authority in legal argument.
I don't know if Niomi is using it to create a whole blog post but what's been posted here doesn't sound like her style, voice, or her vernacular to me. I think she has most definitely either used it to summarise her own thoughts or to elaborate on them, and people are paying for that 'work' thinking she's written it. Using AI to respond to viewer comments, which is a key part of her 'job' as an influencer, is creepy and borderline unethical letting the people engaging with her content think she is replying to them when it's a machine.
Said it before and I'll say it a thousand times - it is high, HIGH time that the influencer 'career' was properly scoped and regulated. Every other industry is/is becoming aware of the risks and pitfalls of AI/LLMs and producing guidance on how to use them (if at all) meanwhile, yet again this unethical, unregulated industry flies under the radar while those profiting from it are making hundreds of thousands if not millions. It's grotesque.
She's always come across as a weirdo- up ladders in skimpy frocks. She's always presented as fake as f--k.
