We need a petition or something to get the NSPCC to notice she’s damaging their credibility
Louise Pentland #16 £1000 on her charity project, £3000 on ugly xmas decorations that last a month
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
As an NSPCC ambassador she should really know better than not give her children accessories with their names plastered all over 
i thought that! as a kid in the nineties, i was never allowed one of those headbands with my name written on it that were super popular at the time, for the exact reason that a child is more vulnerable if strangers know their name! it's just common sense - or it certainly should be for someone who represents a charity which specialises in child protection!As an NSPCC ambassador she should really know better than not give her children accessories with their names plastered all over
and it's not even just Pearl who she's making personalised accessories for - she's happily making individualised sunglasses for loads of other girls with their names emblazoned across the front, placing little girls of all ages at potential risk. perfect NSPCC ambassador, giving such thought to children's safety!
I’m not advocating putting names on clothing and it’ll definitely impact the other children, but is there even anything Louise could do to make her own children less safe at this point? People can go online and find their names, faces, hobbies, school, dance school, favourite soft play, what their bedrooms look like, what their house looks like and the city they live in.
That's really a problem that's going to follow the girls longer than Louise understands. What if someone with obsessive behaviour started stalking one of the girls? So much information is available just like that. I hope Darcy has at least one adult in her life who would support her if she decided she wants to drop the social media work she's pressured to do.
I really hope that too. I worry that the teachers at her school might be worried to express concern over the way she's being brought up online since Matt teaches (taught?) there.
oh, i fully agree that Darcy and Pearl could walk around with their name written on a neon flashing sign above their heads, and it wouldn't place them at any greater risk than they already are, since Louise has plastered their names/ages/faces and millions of other tiny details about them/their lives across the internet.
in terms of the sunglasses, i meant it more as in issue of principle, given that Louise is an NSPCC ambassador, thus supposedly an advocate of child protection, while simultaneously creating named-sunglasses for girls who aren't her daughters - which places them at unnecessary risk, as presumably these aren't kids with a huge SM presence - and by sharing her "crafts", she's giving the impression that allowing your kids to walk round with their name plastered across them is totally safe and advisable!
and while i fully appreciate that many kids do wear t-shirts etc with their names printed on, and it's not a trend Louise has personally started, it seems irresponsible as a representative of the NSPCC to be encouraging something which could potentially place a child at risk, and is actually an issue she could be advising parents against and highlighting the potential risks, rather than actively promoting. it just seems to completely clash with role in the NSPCC - in exactly the same way that it clashes with the way she exploits her own children by sharing every personal detail of their lives online.
Just found this and it is so Lady Louise, almost choked on my diet coke! This is so close to the truth isn't it?
omg this is too good. The capezio comments were literally my mum. Hahahha
I understand being a slow reader. Many people are slow readers. But you'd think she'd at least make an effort to get through ARCs or books sent to her in a professional capacity, books in a similar genre to hers, etc. This woman has a cleaner, both her children are in (pre) school, and she has time to swan about charity shops several times a week. Bring your book in the car and read while the girls are at dance lessons! Get an audible subscription and listen to books in the car! Listen to books while you tidy! Something.Still so wild that she’sghostwritten another fiction book, she’s openly admitted to never reading
If she can't even be bothered keeping a blog up to date and is so busy making anti NSPCC sunglasses how in heaven can she write a book? Even she doesn't believe it, pretty sure she gives a rough outline written on the back of a cardboard box #gifted to her agent who sources a ghost writer asap. She is not and never will be an author. One of my fave celebrity presenters is Jay Blades who is severely dyslexic and struggles to read. Even he published a book and admitted on his documentary that he didn't write it but his name was on the cover. It is a thing. Go back to your glue gun Louise, you're no Jane Austen.Still so wild that she’sghostwritten another fiction book, she’s openly admitted to never reading
From how Louise has always described 'writing' her book I've always gotten the impression that she basically only writes the first draft, potentially it's all still jumbled ideas and bullet points and that then someone else actually makes it semi-decent.
And then she thinks she's an actual author, while most people revise a manuscript countless amount of times before even sending it to the publisher, and then they get given feedback and have to then make more edits themselves.
And then she thinks she's an actual author, while most people revise a manuscript countless amount of times before even sending it to the publisher, and then they get given feedback and have to then make more edits themselves.
She may have done the first disney vlog fairly quick but this one has taken a further 2 weeks despite her trying to come across as proactive and motivated in relation to this job. She also did that whole statement about not wanting to edit her previous disney trip as she was so keen to release this one instead.
It speaks volumes about her work ethic that she can take 2 weeks to edit together a half arsed vlog even if working with a company like Disney - regardless of whether the vlogs were part of the paid content she was asked to produce.
It speaks volumes about her work ethic that she can take 2 weeks to edit together a half arsed vlog even if working with a company like Disney - regardless of whether the vlogs were part of the paid content she was asked to produce.
What worries me is at this point even if Louise did decide to take her children offline, it’s already too late. She’s already shared everything there is to know that makes them unsafe and that information is out there forever. Even if she wanted to stop she couldn’t put an end to it now as it’s too far gone.
Everytime I see that engagement ring 
it was so beautiful and now it’s just looks like something you get from Accessorise
it was so beautiful and now it’s just looks like something you get from Accessorisedid she ever say if she kept Darcy and Pearl’s birthstones as part of the ring?Everytime I see that engagement ring
Without the girls, she doesn’t really have any content. Even if she did, she is too lazy to think of anything different. Her identity is the middle class mummy vlogger. Although without the vlogs now! She seems to be relying on Instagram because reels are quicker to make than YouTube videos.
I didn’t know that she used a ghostwriter for her books.
I didn’t know that she used a ghostwriter for her books.
- Status