well if she has hidden assets during her bankruptcy she'd better hope it doesn't come to light or she could end up with in prison, like Boris Becker.
As someone who was bankrupted by HMRC for not paying her taxes, one does wonder of the brassiness of her stringy neck...She is over on Twitter adding petrol to the fire about tax divisions? She believes that she as a ‘Childless woman’ should be given a lump sum of cash at 60( she’s 64).. to make up for all the women with children/ families she has supported in her life. She hasn’t bleeping supported me ever.
She’s so glaringly uneducated, responds to headlines, impulsive that she cannot view both sides of a debate objectively.
Absolutely no in depth knowledge of World or current UK politics, no desire to read further, no curiosity about anyone else’s life other than her own small bubble.
Her bubble is floating precariously on the Sea of Disaster and she’s too dense to even realise it.
yet ironically it was the HMRC that brought about her bankruptcy so no, she didn't pay for all these women and children, she didn't pay it at all, hence the proceedings, therefore if she actually has a hidden stash, to avoid paying her outstanding tax bill, then she should most definitely be investigated, and face the consequences if guilty. Like I say Boris Becker is currently doing 3 years for the same thing, and he was a well known sports personality who was generally held in good esteem (though all his ex's, and their children may disagree) but I've read stuff that most of them are still behind him because he is a decent and hard working man, who achieved great success, he's done a lot more than jug ears so why the hell should she get away with. Just remembered her get out when she was asked about items she mentioned in the dreary, some of which may have been valuable or cost a lot of money, beauty treatments, designer clothes etc and her crap excuse was that she had to portray herself as a particular type of person for her column, but it wasn't actually true, she really was skint...and then proceeds to say she gets hate because she only writes the truth..no you fkn don't...stupid woman.She believes that she as a ‘Childless woman’ should be given a lump sum of cash at 60( she’s 64).. to make up for all the women with children/ families she has supported in her life
Go check out katie price's wiki for another non-tax-payer, only she seems to get away with everythingyet ironically it was the HMRC that brought about her bankruptcy so no, she didn't pay for all these women and children, she didn't pay it at all, hence the proceedings, therefore if she actually has a hidden stash, to avoid paying her outstanding tax bill, then she should most definitely be investigated, and face the consequences if guilty. Like I say Boris Becker is currently doing 3 years for the same thing, and he was a well known sports personality who was generally held in good esteem (though all his ex's, and their children may disagree) but I've read stuff that most of them are still behind him because he is a decent and hard working man, who achieved great success, he's done a lot more than jug ears so why the hell should she get away with. Just remembered her get out when she was asked about items she mentioned in the dreary, some of which may have been valuable or cost a lot of money, beauty treatments, designer clothes etc and her crap excuse was that she had to portray herself as a particular type of person for her column, but it wasn't actually true, she really was skint...and then proceeds to say she gets hate because she only writes the truth..no you fkn don't...stupid woman.
If the stories are true that his lawyer sent her a cease-and-desist order, then Kerr clearly has read her articles.You know if you felt confident enough to call yourself the new ‘BenJ Lo’ .. ‘ you know people get back together etc etc.. if your next piece was about ‘Getting Married’ again.. you’re dropping cowsheds of manure about Jim Kerr being your squeeze and he (even with bills is a multi millionaire?)
Why are you bleating about a rented cottage?
Why are you envious of pink houses in Nottinghill?
Surely having landed the Rockstar your worries are at an end.. wouldn’t he help you out even for a couple of shags? Cos she does shag on the promise of money?
Oh you like to pay your own way.. yeah right?
I do not believe Jim Kerr has even read an article she has written, he may have been in a room with her 15 years ago but all the rest is detritus.
If the stories are true that his lawyer sent her a cease-and-desist order, then Kerr clearly has read her articles.
Probably Wembley Arena knowing our Liz.I do not believe Jim Kerr has even read an article she has written, he may have been in a room with her 15 years ago but all the rest is detritus.
I understand that LJ is not having a relationship with any rock star. But it's pretty common knowledge that she received a cease-and-desist letter from Jim Kerr's lawyers, because she was IMPLYING they were in a relationship. He asked her to stop doing that because he was already in a relationship. Having received the cease-and-desist, Liz mentioned it in her column, but changed a pertinent detail.Nope, she told us the FRS had sent her a cease and desist to stop talking about their relationship, and everyone thought it was JK, the more I think about it, it's more likely that she was looking for a way out of that story arc, simply because it was becoming ridiculous and there wad no way she could name him...BECAUSE HE DOES NOT EXIST..and the more her readers questioned it and the more people began to dig..the FRS disappeared in the same magical puff of smoke that he first appeared in.
Not sure she had any such legal missive, that is just another figment of her imagination, firstly to give a reason why she couldn't talk about him anymore and to use it as another arc of "but I am a writer, writers write, so I will write about you, even if it is a load of bollocks, I don't care..
....
All true ... she does not understand "when in a hole, stop digging"fair enough she didn't need to lie, but she does anyway, and I'm not sure she would even mention a cease and desist if it was in any way linked to JK's lawyers saying none of it is true our client has never had a relationship with Jones, I think that was just what people thought it could be even though Jones said it was to stop her discussing their relationship. who knows she's a liar who lies and there never was a rock star.