Report it and they will remove itAny way to remove the content? There is no longer a delete button...
Report it and they will remove itAny way to remove the content? There is no longer a delete button...
Done please also report Krusties as I don't wish to get Kirsty in any trouble with the 2 evil onesReport it and they will remove it
Hit "report" and ask moderator to deleteAny way to remove the content? There is no longer a delete button...
He says "everything after that is completely made up", but that is only AFTER they've had their shouting match in the street. I reckon he had already hit her inside the house (which tallies with what he's said) before the argument reached the street and he's trying to put up a smoke screen. I'm perfectly sure he hit her.Say we were to believe this story, why on EARTH would you stay with someone who would do you dirty like that? I am baffled.
I see Ms Bankrupt has bought what must be hundreds of pounds of Balloons for another getaway. Can’t make it up.
Then why on earth did the Police condone KP meeting up with him by tagging along, let alone allowing her to sit in the car with her alleged abuser whilst they were in the distance, they should have at least been in hearing distance, I thought it looked very bad on the Police. As for ’supposed celebs‘ we all pay the same tax, or should do according to our earnings (ok maybe not in KPs case) and the Police also have had a tit load of problems letting normal folks down, who’ve gone on to be killed by their abuser. So I’m afraid KP’s preferential treatment by the Police just doesn’t sit right.If you remember back to Caroline Flack, her PR Agency got lamped by the public and the media for not carrying out due diligence and “saving” her from herself.
Kirstie sounds like she was trying to protect KP as her Agent (and probably a caring human being).
A Zeleb has more attention from the Bill than us poor normal folks.
The Bill have a sh!t load of problems charging someone if the victim doesn’t comply, this is seemingl where the coercive control charge came from.
At the end the only thing which was “prosecutable” seems to have been the shouting (if it was captured on CCTV he can’t really deny it).
Sometimes the simplest explanation is the truest.
^^ This is my “spin” on the slapgate saga.
If it’s not a DM then it’s public domainPrivate messages/conversation shouldn't be published without permission in general, it's a breach of privacy.. so I wouldn't really go that way.. I'm sure he will read it here or some deluded fans will and let them know lol
Dw it was an innocent mistake to make. They will remove it. I don’t think Kirsty would’ve bothered to reply if she was in any danger from the tracksuit twins!Done please also report Krusties as I don't wish to get Kirsty in any trouble with the 2 evil ones
That would be a typical narcissist thing, treating their child like an adult friend and burdening them with details about an adult relationship. It's over stepping boundaries and if she shared anything about sex is a form of abuse. I wouldn't be surprised.So here we have it:
Kris contacted Princess to have Katie call him. Princess told Katie, and Katie was asking her child if she should leave Carl for Kris. Carl saw the texts and beat her in front of the 2 younger kids. I’m not posting the screen shots out of respect for Kirsty and Princess but they’re real. Seeing Katie talk to her kid as if she was a mate is vile.
I hope you're right and she gets her comeuppance but I still say she's in charge here. She will let him think he's in control but she's been in the business of bleeping people over for years and knows how it works. I hope he is the one to bring her down but I'd also be watching my back if I was himI think it's HE throwing HER under the bus by getting her to change her story to exonerate him.
I think he slapped her, or beat her, or punched her, or kicked her, or stamped on her, who knows which. but she may have hit him first.
Fully agree but there is and always has been one rule for some, and another for the rest.Then why on earth did the Police condone KP meeting up with him by tagging along, let alone allowing her to sit in the car with her alleged abuser whilst they were in the distance, they should have at least been in hearing distance, I thought it looked very bad on the Police. As for ’supposed celebs‘ we all pay the same tax, or should do according to our earnings (ok maybe not in KPs case) and the Police also have had a tit load of problems letting normal folks down, who’ve gone on to be killed by their abusers so I’m afraid KP’s preferential treatment by the Police shouldn’t be acceptable.
So very true.Fully agree but there is and always has been one rule for some, and another for the rest.
There was very clear manipulation being used on KPs end. My heart hurts for Princess.That would be a typical narcissist thing, treating their child like an adult friend and burdening them with details about an adult relationship. It's over stepping boundaries and if she shared anything about sex is a form of abuse. I wouldn't be surprised.
more like her only !There’s not going to be many guests at the wedding like no other, is there?
Oh...maybe that’s why it won’t be like any other....just her, Cole and the prison chaplain.
It's very odd. I thought a potential victim of DV was classed as a vulnerable witness. She either was or she wasn't?!Then why on earth did the Police condone KP meeting up with him by tagging along, let alone allowing her to sit in the car with her alleged abuser whilst they were in the distance, they should have at least been in hearing distance, I thought it looked very bad on the Police. As for ’supposed celebs‘ we all pay the same tax, or should do according to our earnings (ok maybe not in KPs case) and the Police also have had a tit load of problems letting normal folks down, who’ve gone on to be killed by their abuser. So I’m afraid KP’s preferential treatment by the Police just doesn’t sit right.