Chapeau! ~Forensic~ work there.Frauen, I have been BUSY… am I too late with this??
View attachment 1789169
2 hours later…
View attachment 1789171
Coincidence? Inspiration? Or copycat?
I’ll take “copycat” please.
Chapeau! ~Forensic~ work there.Frauen, I have been BUSY… am I too late with this??
View attachment 1789169
2 hours later…
View attachment 1789171
Coincidence? Inspiration? Or copycat?
If I had that type of money to spend on a watch, I’d have a CartierI asked a couple of friends who are into watches about Jack's Breitling comments. Their opinion seems to be that they tend to be bigger and blingier than anything else in any given price bracket, and are anything but "less crass" than a Rolex or Omega.
"fine if you're wanting to make a very loud statement, but you wouldn't want it to be your only watch" was one comment. Sounds like they might go well with her humiliating trousers, tbh.
Oh my goodness!! Honestly Jack Monroe is a total joke!!!! Chapeau, Amanda!!Frauen, I have been BUSY… am I too late with this??
View attachment 1789169
2 hours later…
View attachment 1789171
Coincidence? Inspiration? Or copycat?
The important distinction being back then he was in the NICU whereas now she's planning to send him to school tomorrow (i.e. today). headFrauen, I have been BUSY… am I too late with this??
View attachment 1789169
2 hours later…
View attachment 1789171
Coincidence? Inspiration? Or copycat?
My mum bought mine but that’s because I accidentally put it in her trolley instead of mine in Lidl #thriftytipsI don't even understand why someone would get an advent calendar for their 34 year old daughter??
Tesco, dear heart. Reduced to £4 when I saw them yesterday xWhere could one purchase a Reece’s Pieces advent calendar on the 7th December I wonder?
Darwin eh? Good luck there Jack... If Tojo never made it to Darwin, the Sarfend Slopgoblin hasn't a hope in hell.Sorryheadpal, I don't live my life on twitter. Good luck finding me by my eye P too, cos Darwin's not a pleasant town to be trying to go door knocking to find me either.
Jack, we all know he doesn't live with you so stfu you absolute fud.
How can you when THE DOOR’S ALREADY OPEN?Stay away from the 19th. WARNED.
I agree with ghastly and divine, but we definitely had a pantry. I grew up in a tiny mid-terrace in the north and the kitchen was too small to keep food in so it was all in the pantry (space under the stairs with shelves in.) It was freezing cold because the walls had no treatment on them, just bare stone, so I guess good for veg and stuff...?Also I know this is very, very old news now and I'm preaching to the converted and sorry for derailing slightly, but no working class person has ever used the words 'ghastly' or 'divine' (which Jack does often) or referred to their pantry or larder.
I've read the insect's reply about 10 times now and it still makes no sense. I can't work out what she's saying at all. Probably I'm just being a bit dim, can anyone explain?The non symmetrical bug is still a simpering turd btw. Jack’s liked this of course-her creepy little cheerleader is her new pet. I wonder if she kept the patreon she signed up to from spite-what a monumental fool to be funding & brown nosing Jack of all people.
Yup, we’ve a pantry just like that now, stuffed to the gills. I grew up with a mum and nanna in council houses which also had under-stair pantries in the kitchen. Mine is missing a nice stone shelf, but I get by *sniff*.I agree with ghastly and divine, but we definitely had a pantry. I grew up in a tiny mid-terrace in the north and the kitchen was too small to keep food in so it was all in the pantry (space under the stairs with shelves in.) It was freezing cold because the walls had no treatment on them, just bare stone, so I guess good for veg and stuff...?
Yes, I suspected that account was her too.I just had a quick look at the bird site and clicked on the profile of one of the most prolific defenders on there right now. Language seemed familiar (antagonistic, combative, twattish), so I googled the name of the company in the profile. It doesn't exist. The profile picture does exist, however and belongs to a marine biologist with the same name as the . The real person died in 1948 and was a friend of John Steinbeck, who wrote about a fictional business with a very similar name to the one the is supposedly CEO of.
The company used by the does exist, but not in the place 'he' says it is. It's in a different country. Even her socks are tit poorly thought out lies that can be easily exposed with a modicum of research. That took me two minutes.
Also, bit of a weird coincidence that if you search for the name of the company used by the (google it in quotes), the first result is a tit travel blog from 2013 which also uses the name incorrectly and also in reference to the John Steinbeck novel. The blogger has supposedly been to ALL the continents, however the content under the many places they've supposedly visited is just cut and pasted and repeated in each section. Entries for Verona are posted in Argentina, for example. I haven't got the time or the inclination to read any of the posts. However I do find it a bit odd
Screenshotted the sock and the blog for posterity obvs
(Edited for punctuation because I am FORENSIC)
Any clues, please?I just had a quick look at the bird site and clicked on the profile of one of the most prolific defenders on there right now. Language seemed familiar (antagonistic, combative, twattish), so I googled the name of the company in the profile. It doesn't exist. The profile picture does exist, however and belongs to a marine biologist with the same name as the . The real person died in 1948 and was a friend of John Steinbeck, who wrote about a fictional business with a very similar name to the one the is supposedly CEO of.
The company used by the does exist, but not in the place 'he' says it is. It's in a different country. Even her socks are tit poorly thought out lies that can be easily exposed with a modicum of research. That took me two minutes.
Also, bit of a weird coincidence that if you search for the name of the company used by the (google it in quotes), the first result is a tit travel blog from 2013 which also uses the name incorrectly and also in reference to the John Steinbeck novel. The blogger has supposedly been to ALL the continents, however the content under the many places they've supposedly visited is just cut and pasted and repeated in each section. Entries for Verona are posted in Argentina, for example. I haven't got the time or the inclination to read any of the posts. However I do find it a bit odd
Screenshotted the sock and the blog for posterity obvs
(Edited for punctuation because I am FORENSIC)
Hang on, rewind, maybe I'm not so FORENSIC after all. The name of the business is the actual name used by John Steinbeck so that travel blog is probably just a tit travel blog
Sorry, I edited to remove the second half of that post because if you google the name in full (rather than the abbreviation used in the profile) you do actually get more results than the tit travel blog, so I think that was just a coincidence. I've never read the book or heard of either name and was doing some half-arsed research to make a point. The first part of my post made the point, the second half was just confusing so I deleted it.Any clues, please?
See. I'm not convinced that account is her. Obviously the name and stuff isn't real but welcome to Twitter, however looking back over their tweets they don't seem to share many Jack interests beyond boilerplate Tories bad. This appears to be the first time they've shown any interest and from what I can see from their infrequent tweeting they seem be desperate for a Twitter argument. Going for an anti-Jack account seems as good a way as any to get a reaction and to me it looks like more what they're interested in that Jack herself. Also the more obvious Jack socks tend to delete and reappear whereas this once seem fairly constant. As ever, it's Twitter so I don't know who it is but I'm not convinced it's Jack.Yes, I suspected that account was her too.
Tragic.