I liked this reply a lot, then realised it wasn't ironic, and I was sad
Attachments
-
42.8 KB
-
64 KB
I was being sarcastic. I’m under no illusions whatsoever that she isn’t sat refreshing her feed relishing in her army tearing people apart. They’ve actually gone pretty easy on me but I genuinely meant it in my original tweet when I said I wasn’t interested in what they have to say.How naively one tweeter here says Jack would be 'devastated to know her fans are unkind to people'. Bollocks. She courts it, encourages it and takes a huge amount of glee from it.
She is not a nice person.
Exactly. I'm a fan of the occasional bit of hyperbole for effect but not every sentence has to be so over the top.The way she writes and speaks makes me want to
It’s VERY CAITLIN MORANArgh. Her use of capital letters irritates me SO MUCH.
Same, like I discussed the other day I find something incredibly sinister about her.Yes! Demonic is exactly it.
She's really frightening. The energy she gives off makes me feel so uncomfortable.
I think she claims any acquaintance etc as her own “her lawyer” “my psychiatrist on soeed dial” etc.Her lawyer from her libel case is definitely not cheap and I doubt he does much pro bono work for celebs https://www.patronlaw.co.uk/mark-lewis-joins-patron-law/ - I assume it’s the same lawyer as he now lives in Israel. It’s not really the norm for people on living wage to have access to top libel lawyers is it?
I knew one of his colleagues in the phone hacking case - her rate started at £600 per hour & expenses. Please note the ‘started’
Ah, that person was being sarky. Sorry, I've inadvertently changed the narrative - Here's the hero of the moment, in full. And apologies for that error; Jack, this shows how a little manipulation can go a long way, doesn't it?How naively one tweeter here says Jack would be 'devastated to know her fans are unkind to people'. Bollocks. She courts it, encourages it and takes a huge amount of glee from it.
She is not a nice person.
She never, ever mentions the huge amount of social capital she has. She has access to SO much - the Groucho & its membership, relationships with publishers/TV bookers/etc/etc, bluetickers, freebies and/or discounts from brands, the ability to shake her Patreon jar & receive an influx of donations (as per that graph that's been on the thread before), etc, etc. So when she goes on about the living wage it's really quite sickening, her living wage =/= everybody else's.Her lawyer from her libel case is definitely not cheap and I doubt he does much pro bono work for celebs https://www.patronlaw.co.uk/mark-lewis-joins-patron-law/ - I assume it’s the same lawyer as he now lives in Israel. It’s not really the norm for people on living wage to have access to top libel lawyers is it?
I knew one of his colleagues in the phone hacking case - her rate started at £600 per hour & expenses. Please note the ‘started’
She would hate that!Or because she clearly wants this forgotten, being the only tweet she deleted. Thread suggestion:
Jack Monroe: implied that David Walliams used cocaine to fuel his writing.