It's my understanding that she'd have to disprove the claim to make her 'libel' stand up.Not a legal Frau but I'm pretty sure she's wrong about that last bit?
God, talk about projection! I imagine Martin's pals are slapping him on the back and whooping because there must have been a few that doubted even Jack would be stupid enough to walk straight into this. The more this goes on, the more I'm convinced they planned this on flip charts.I like it when it's just blue tics being snippy to each other and I don't have to do any squigging....
View attachment 1264800
And meI will 100% do this.
No, she’s right about that. But there’ll be an awful lot of information in the discovery process which will make her v uncomfortable.Not a legal Frau but I'm pretty sure she's wrong about that last bit?
That's in the US. In the UK it's the other way around.It's my understanding that she'd have to disprove the claim to make her 'libel' stand up.
Which means allowing an accountant look at her books... All of them..
FOR THE LOVE OF SLOP SOMEONE PLEASE TELL HER THAT SHE DOESN'T EVEN KNOW THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN LIBEL AND SLANDER
But she's not bringing a claim. She may not even have a claim. Twitter is not court.
Death threats no doubt.Yeah Jack would do well to just shut the hell up now, these people aren't going to suffer her tit! Wonder how long it takes her to claim she's getting abuse in her DMs?
Do expenses actually count as income given that they are mostly for staffing etc?As a freelancer her income will fluctuate a lot anyway, won't it? So theoretically there could be both months where she earned more than the PM's monthly salary (although I doubt it'd be more than his overall income, esp considering expenses) and those where she earned less. In which case wouldn't they be equally right/wrong?