Quite probably Dearheart, all I meant was served a purpose for attention and then pfffft no further mention. I’d imagine Mini and her new carer ticked the No Publicity box.Mini the kitten lives in a tumbledown thatched cottage with lots of other lovely cats and kittens all cared for by a kind old lady who goes prizewinning roses. I refuse to to see or hear anything that would lead me to believe otherwise.
Like all the 'OH' mentions.Quite probably Dearheart, all I meant was served a purpose for attention and then pfffft no further mention. I’d imagine Mini and her new carer ticked the No Publicity box.
I understand what you are saying. Completely. But for me. I would identify much more with someone who has been on UC recently than someone who gave up a secure job to go on benefits over a decade ago. I’m also not criticising women who struggle with childcare.But she still went to grammar school, but was ‘unlucky’. She also has parents with respectable jobs and were also foster carers.
IF she had them, she grifted. Money to fix her website, more than once, how’s that going?I understand what you are saying. Completely. But for me. I would identify much more with someone who has been on UC recently than someone who gave up a secure job to go on benefits over a decade ago. I’m also not criticising women who struggle with childcare.
She has nothing to contribute these days. You notice that she’s always asking for people’s back stories and that’s because she doesn’t have a clue about what it’s like to be on UC
I’ve just gone back on UC although I do have some other money as well so I’m not existing on that alone just now but I have in the past. I know more about benefits right now than she does. Like. At the beginning of lockdown she was selling paintings I think and someone suggested to her that she go on UC and it was shudders. I couldn’t do that.
But it’s ok for me and millions of others? It would affect her mental health too much? Is there anything that doesnt? Twitter does. Being on Tv does. Twitter does. The only thing that doesn’t affect her mental health is the grifting of the folk she’s sucked in to give her dosh. Apparently she also started asking for money because she couldn’t take on as much work due to her arthritis.
Ok. So how did she manage to do DKL and the Hellman’s collaboration and other jobs if she’s crippled with arthritis. Why doesn’t she apply for PIP or what the benefit is that replaced DLA?
She doesnt need to be grifting like this. She could have applied for benefits due to her health conditions years ago.
Grunking...but you got it! She can then go to corporates and use these supposed engagement figures to get more sponsored work. Tried and trusted method!If she has been cut, it would explain the mania and the surrounding herself with 1000+ sycophants a day…
She's probably too wealthy to get benefits. Can't you have like no more than £3k in savings? I bet she's well sorted.I understand what you are saying. Completely. But for me. I would identify much more with someone who has been on UC recently than someone who gave up a secure job to go on benefits over a decade ago. I’m also not criticising women who struggle with childcare.
She has nothing to contribute these days. You notice that she’s always asking for people’s back stories and that’s because she doesn’t have a clue about what it’s like to be on UC
I’ve just gone back on UC although I do have some other money as well so I’m not existing on that alone just now but I have in the past. I know more about benefits right now than she does. Like. At the beginning of lockdown she was selling paintings I think and someone suggested to her that she go on UC and it was shudders. I couldn’t do that.
But it’s ok for me and millions of others? It would affect her mental health too much? Is there anything that doesnt? Twitter does. Being on Tv does. Twitter does. The only thing that doesn’t affect her mental health is the grifting of the folk she’s sucked in to give her dosh. Apparently she also started asking for money because she couldn’t take on as much work due to her arthritis.
Ok. So how did she manage to do DKL and the Hellman’s collaboration and other jobs if she’s crippled with arthritis. Why doesn’t she apply for PIP or what the benefit is that replaced DLA?
She doesnt need to be grifting like this. She could have applied for benefits due to her health conditions years ago.
Yes she has to collect pov stories to use in her own narrative. Munchies are known to do the same to bolster their delusions of illness.She has nothing to contribute these days. You notice that she’s always asking for people’s back stories and that’s because she doesn’t have a clue about what it’s like to be on UC
classic narc tactic. It’s scary how similarity they can operate. It’s so clever and yet it really isn’t. Most narcs I’ve met aren’t particularly clever people, they are just very cunning and manipulative. It’s like second nature to them, they don’t even have to think about it.She’s accused people of stalking as well. It’s all buzz words to get attention. Trolling. Stalking. Abuse. She goes for the shock factor knowing that people won’t ask for details. It’s horrible awful manipulation of people.
It’s really awful manipulation of people. She knows what she’s doing. As soon as she mentions she’s being stalked she gets sympathy. As for her comments that if she told 1 per cent of it people would be shocked. On you go then, tell it.
She’s an actual embarrassment. Remember the tweets she made about an ex teacher stalking her then when she was challenged she said she was in a fugue state? I can only assume her new partner isn’t following her on twitter.
You can get UC if you have between 6000 and 16000 in savings. A reduced amount but they’ll still pay rent as well. Not always full rent depending on the LHA rate. Anything below 6000 in savings is disregarded for UC purposes. You also get some council tax reduction as well.She's probably too wealthy to get benefits. Can't you have like no more than £3k in savings? I bet she's well sorted.
And her Patreon earnings are on public record.She's probably too wealthy to get benefits. Can't you have like no more than £3k in savings? I bet she's well sorted.
Place your bets Frauen.Slept through Vanessa Feltz's increasingly desparate phone calls?
Time to crank out the tried and tested excuse surely
View attachment 1191227
I think the clip and article are from Private Eye, not sure if you’d prefer to try and link to the source for ease? Sorry I don’t have a link to share.I've just found something quite interesting which might explain the Guardian article no-show. Over the last couple of years Owen Jones has been in Twitter spats with various colleagues, which has resulted in complaints being made about his conduct. The rights and wrongs of that aren't relevant, nor are the issues they were fighting about but what I think could be is that he has been spoken to about his social media conduct by management, who have also drawn up a code of conduct that applies to all regular contributors (not just staff) on their personal social media where they are regarded as representing the Guardian.
Given Jack's somewhat volatile Twitter presence, I wonder if they're coming to the view that she's potentially more hassle than she's worth? Lets face it, what guarantee would they have that they wouldn't publish an article and within 10 minutes flat Jack is trying to get a Twitter pile on going against someone mentioned in it and involving the Guardian in another complaint?
Suzanne Moore has tweeted a clipping from Private Eye regarding the saga. As I couldn't get a good screenshot of the clipping without breaking it up, I've linked directly to her Tweet. Appreciate she's a controversial figure for some so I've stuck it behind a spoiler so you can look if you choose or skip if you'd rather not.
The game I played on my phone said I had an IQ of 180 when I put all the puzzle blocks in the right place so I can tell you all about whirling dervish!My mum used to say “you’re running around like a whirling dervish” when I was young and being a bit of a… well, child, being active and annoying, ya know? Maybe she’s heard her mum say it and BIG WORDS’d it and got it totally wrong. Again.
Private Eye doesn't have the article online, I'm afraid.I think the clip and article are from Private Eye, not sure if you’d prefer to try and link to the source for ease? Sorry I don’t have a link to share.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?