What I don't like (amongst loads of other things) is that Jack always links every kind of purchase, wether it is thousands of horrible looking cutlery to sideboards to holidays with either a horrible condition that justifies it (so depressed that I needed a short trip) or that it was gifted to her. She rarely admits having bought something just like anyone buys anything. It is manipulative and I think she is lying about the majority of it. Just a feeling m'lud!
She then accuses the coven of not wanting her to have nice things, which is ,again ,an accusation. Nobody here would want anyone to have little but she exchanges cause and effect- we don't like her because she twists the truth and has long been vague and not set the record straight that she is not poor anymore. Why do the squigs need to fund someone who lives in a large bungalow in a good area?
As with depression- from my own experience- a spontaneous trip to Venice does not fix real depression. She paints a picture of having NEEDED this trip and that her braggy food indulgances are justified.
It is the fabricated justifications and entitlement that I am angry about. When I went through poor patches this is exactly what wealthy 'friends' did...they could not say that they went on multiple holidays (I would have been OK with that, nobody needs to explain anything to me) just because but that they had some kind of condition which justified it.
The fact that Jack needs to give a reason or explain that something was gifted IMHO only serves one purpose:to continuingly let people assume she has always been and is still poor.
This is a reminder why I am here- because I nearly donated money (I am a fool) based on the assumption that she was still very poor.