It's a Doodles by Ben sticker, you get one when you buy the pin.Is that "Hello My Name Is" sticker new too? From "treatment"?
I hate posting this because I know she'll be getting a kick out of it...
It's a Doodles by Ben sticker, you get one when you buy the pin.Is that "Hello My Name Is" sticker new too? From "treatment"?
I hate posting this because I know she'll be getting a kick out of it...
Staedtlers? She really does want to be a Frau, doesn't she?She's actually upgraded in the new twatty pic, she's got Sharpies and Staedtlers pens now. Fancy. (Both expensive choices even when on offer)
Jack has said that she is ok with femail pronouns. If she is no longer happy with this she should be explicit. Changing your bio on Twitter, as she does constantly, is not being explicit.I think we should be very careful about using the correct pronouns for Jack. Not only because its the right thing to do, but you just know during the next 'mendacious bullies' rant they will accuse everyone here of misgendering them.
Same. I get tripped up on anyone's pronouns as it is if there's more than one in a sentence. I do not know why. I also get confused reading numbers in the teens because of the 24hr clock as well so I figure I'm just broken.Pronouns are they/them, which means you're meant to refer to Jack as 'they'. I'll be using their (ie Jack's) name a lot more as I find the sentence structures easier to understand that way. Hope that makes sense.
While I normally agree with the sentiment, Jack's pronouns are 'making sure people are fed' (or some such nonsense, as replied to a squiggle who jumped on someone else due to perceived-pronoun-mendacity) AND Jack just tweeted a few days ago about being a woman online and how that means editing every word you type. So I think it's fair to say that she/her and they/them are fine here.I think we should be very careful about using the correct pronouns for Jack. Not only because its the right thing to do, but you just know during the next 'mendacious bullies' rant they will accuse everyone here of misgendering them.
Yep, people will like any old tit. Hunch proven!one hundred thousand likes on the still not deleted hunchy tweet
presumably that's confirmed their hunch, whatever it was
I'm a Twitter dunce, can anyone clue me up on what they're trying to achieve? Who would shadow ban etc?one hundred thousand likes on the still not deleted hunchy tweet
presumably that's confirmed their hunch, whatever it was
This is it. I have a few friends who have changed pronouns, and yeah, they may have got the eyeroll reaction from some when they publicly announced the change, yet it serves the purpose of getting the info out there factually and gives no excuses for getting it wrong from there on. (Slip-ups do happen, there's no malice, but sometimes it takes a mental transition for some to correct themselves naturally).I just looked at Jack's Twitter bio and it says they/them.
If I misgender you, Jack, it's because you keep moving the goal posts.
Jack's and my idea of work diverge a tad.
I’m confused.I'm still laughing my leg off at the ludicrous working 100 hours a week claim.
If this is true (obviously it isn't) has anyone ever been so spectacularly unproductive? As others have said Jack bizarrely thinks pointless twitter spats count as work - 'activism'.
(Bearing in mind the sneery attitude to people who have 'normal' jobs - laughing at the supermarket employee, obvious disdain for teachers).
Analytical?
I'm a Twitter dunce, can anyone clue me up on what they're trying to achieve? Who would shadow ban etc?
They'll be pleased as punch on those engagement levels, when they finally arise from their pit of pens!
It's just a slightly dressed up version of 'Click to confirm you are not a robot'.I honestly just think that they've not had a big numbers tweet in a while, so just tweeted something vaguely intriguing to get people interested
pop a "like this if you see it" and people absolutely will. minimum effort for a smidge of blue tick interaction
Not just the girls.A bit like those girls at school who had amazingly detailed revision plans that took them eight weeks to prepare.