and the crumpled bog paper fascinatorThis one takes some beating, the blue marquee
View attachment 2131123
and the crumpled bog paper fascinatorThis one takes some beating, the blue marquee
View attachment 2131123
I was thinking the same.I suspect cousins rather than sibling will assist should both sides want it.
The first and foremost problem with this is that it simply doesn’t fit.All fairly awful. It's hard to choose.
The one I cannot get past though is the thing she wore to visit the Royal Variety nursing home.
It's unflattering, and very uncomfortable looking.
I'm not sure what occasion it would suit tbh, but definitely not that one.
Presume she had someone styling her when she initially became part of the royal family as she did look presentable on some occasions but they definitely had given up by this time.
View attachment 2131097
Off to check this out. I've just ordered a ninja air fryer from there (the single drawer one) to replace my £30 one, which has served me well to be fair.There's a cute Radley Coronaton Tote for sale at QVC. Wanted to get it for my mum but I'm totally skint!
Didn't she say she couldn't wear colour in the RF.My mum had a tea set with that pattern on it.
There are many words that would describe her but elegance is one thing she will never attain.Didn't she say she couldn't wear colour in the RF.
She has said here in 2012 she prefers nude, neutral and black.
View attachment 2131167
Dreadful lump, always looks like a bleeping sack tied in the middleThere are many words that would describe her but elegance is one thing she will never attain.
Always looks like she off to an out-call.Dreadful lump, always looks like a bleeping sack tied in the middle
DM article:
---Harry's hacking claims contained 'troubling factual inconsistencies'
Harry claimed for the first time on Tuesday that a 'secret agreement' between the Royal Family and news executives stopped him bringing hacking claims earlier.www.dailymail.co.uk
Oh, and, by the way ...
V
I
P
but if they were only stripped of the Duke/Duchess titles wouldn’t that mean they would be required to be Using the title they rejected for Archie of the Earl and countess of DumbartonThis is the thing.
She would be Princess Henry but nobody would call her that. They would call her Princess Meghan and we don't want that.
So, no matter how much we might want the Duke/Duchess titles to be stripped from them, we have to remember that it would mean she'd be called Princess so we have to grit our teeth and put up with her being Duchess.
I had the same thought lolMaybe they could put the Sussex title into abeyance, but leave the Earldom in place, and announce that Earl and Countess of You-Know-Where are their new titles.
Smeg would loathe that, but the Wessexes are precedent for Earl/Countess for a younger son.
And stops 'Princess Henry' swiftly morphing into 'Princess Smeg'.