Daily Star article today raises concerns that Smeg's being "stalked" as she was papped
without her consent dropping Farchy off at school. OMG! Farchy's face in view!! Smeg and Farchy's safety could be compromised! Leave them alone! (Article by Naomi Adedokun).... Daft Bint didn't wonder how a short-arse with chicken-legs could heft that swaying huge photoshopped child onto her foam bump with one hand and carry on walking and smirking in bedroom slippers.
@TheMusician posted earlier on this thread that "Hazzno's behaviour over the last 2 years has emphasised how problematic his mother's behaviour was. ... Saint Diana's image is getting tainted now".
How ironic that Hazzno has single-handedly begun to destroy the carefully preserved iconic status of the dead parent who he carries around to gain sympathy. His cooperation with Netflix and possessive shrouding of himself in her memory has brought the bones of the real Diana to the surface for all to see. The RF covered for her just like they covered for him, but that protection is gone now and look what's happened.
Diana' died in 1997 and was left in peace for about 22 years, her image carefully guarded and Charles taking the flak along with Camilla.
Hazzno inadvertently Markled his own mother by using her to damage the Royal Family. This proves beyond doubt that H&M corrupt everything they touch. Even when it's unintentional like this with Diana, they really are the kiss of death.
The upside for Charles is that people maybe realise he's not the monster he was portrayed and this could be why he's a bit more popular now? This popularity however small will be unwelcome news for Hazzno. It's called the law of unintended consequences