How to tell lies and bullshit people
Harry and Meghan #80 Hazza's completely under Meg's thumb, have you always been this dumb?
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Anyway, we applaud the Harkles for standing by their commitment to championing diversity. Let's have a look at their top team, then. Oh, wait...
ETA Maybe BP could lend them their Diversity Tsar, looks like the Harkles need some help....
James Holt - new Executive Director, Archewell
Ben Browning - Head of Content, Archewell
Christine Schirmer - Head of Communications.
ETA Maybe BP could lend them their Diversity Tsar, looks like the Harkles need some help....
James Holt - new Executive Director, Archewell
Ben Browning - Head of Content, Archewell
Christine Schirmer - Head of Communications.
Very wrong.Was it wrong of me to click on the link to the porn video in the comments and will I recover?
And somewhere in those comments Kim Kardashian is proposed as her legal advisor. Excellent resource, fully recommend as will do much for her profile.
I did too.
Actually it's not the one I saw last year, where the girl was a decent (?) lookylike apart from a big collection of tatts.This woman is the spit of smeggy facially and has all her expressions with the wonky are-you-Ok eyebrows going on too. What has put me off believing it's her is the nice figure. The woman is more shapely and has nice medium sized tits, whereas smeggy's are on the small size(not flat but not a big handful.)and is more of a boxy shape.But there again in older images smeggy clearly had a tit job, so who knows, but yes, definitely a great lookylike.
I just don't think it's her. That would have been hidden deeper.
Oh I don't know.
I've started adding some of the more useful twitter accounts that regularly tweet on Markle stuff to the wiki. I have more to add which I will add when I have time, or as I see useful accounts posted (must be ones that deliver regular Markle content, not occasional stuff in a sea of other stuff)
Here's a shortcut to that part of the wiki.
Here's a shortcut to that part of the wiki.
Harry and Meghan Wiki
[URL='https://tattle.life/wiki/harry-and-meghan-references-2/']Newspaper articles and social media re H&M's joint projects and endeavours[/URL] [URL='https://tattle.life/wiki/harry-and-meghan-references-3/']Newspaper articles and social media re Harry's solo projects and endeavours[/URL]...
tattle.life
Am I alone in finding it incredibly easy to imagine James Holt aged 7, in school uniform with shorts, grazed knees and a rucksack?Anyway, we applaud the Harkles for standing by their commitment to championing diversity. Let's have a look at their top team, then. Oh, wait...
James Holt - new Executive Director, Archewell
Ben Browning - Head of Content, Archewell
Christine Schirmer - Head of Communications.
if this is them, they are really invisible
http://theinvisiblehand.com/?page_id=102
latest blog post from 2017
It’s not working
It is, and it's shite, so let's hope it is them!!
That's the point
I'm shocked. Their Executive Director is a white man! 
Attachments
If you wrote this bullshit wordsalad in a school essay, I'm guessing you wouldn't score many points
This kind of nonsense is an example I'd use when telling/warning my kids you don't always have to be the smartest or even make sense in the corporate world.
The Mean Girls Strategy - BLIND GOSSIP
[Blind Gossip] If you are a fan of the movie Mean Girls, you may remember a scene in which some of the characters devise a plan of attack on The Plastics. Janis Ian (played by Lizzy Caplan) and Damien (Daniel Franzese) befriend new student Cady Heron (Lindsay Lohan). They tell her about a...
blindgossip.com
Best comment on the Mail's write up of today's reshuffle..
They should call their foundation 'Arrivals & Departures, nobody sticks around for very long!
ETA Interesting comment
It was said at the time of her hiring that she was on a one year prepaid contract, and many assumed that Charles was the one who paid. It's too embarrassing to admit she left as soon as her contract expired, because the Sussexes have extremely high staff turnover, so they came up with the face-saving "senior advisory" nonsense. Everyone in the business world knows that means she's gone.
They should call their foundation 'Arrivals & Departures, nobody sticks around for very long!
ETA Interesting comment
It was said at the time of her hiring that she was on a one year prepaid contract, and many assumed that Charles was the one who paid. It's too embarrassing to admit she left as soon as her contract expired, because the Sussexes have extremely high staff turnover, so they came up with the face-saving "senior advisory" nonsense. Everyone in the business world knows that means she's gone.
Bear in mind the bullying allegations, you would think this would be the last thing she wanted...another staff member leaving so soon, with questions why?Their vindictivness will be their undoing.
Smeggy fails to realise that she needs the press to be successful merching etc and you need to keep them sweet. Slagging off the royal family also looks terrible to everyone who doesn't buy into the 'wicked oppressors' narrative. They are shooting themselves in the foot all the time.
If they had left with grace and dignity and kept their whingeing to themselves far more people would be interested in them. Its funny that Meghan thinks she's insanely smart when she cant see how bad this looks.
Of course she's actually insane rather than insanely smart. No strategic thinking at all.
But then again, as you say Scotch, she is insane!
I wonder if this latest departure is in any way connected to the bullying investigation?
I thought the Mail had appealed and it will be heard on 6th April? Whether they have to print it at all? Apologies if this is posted further down the thread, am just catching up.
and I thought they'd employed Liz Hurley for a moment there!Something like this perhaps (I found it more effective to send letter, because email contact was bogged down and email was just returned after 3 days):
Boris Johnson
House of Commons
London
SW1A 0AA
Dear Mr Johnson
The monarchy exists only with the consent of the people and is accountable to the people through Parliament.
When do you plan to hold the Duke and Duchess of Sussex accountable for their treasonous disloyalty, as demanded by the overwhelming majority of the British people?
I respectfully request that you initiate action to remove Harry and his offspring from the succession. The justification for this is as follows:
Tempting as it may be to bury your head in the sand and keep passing the buck back to Her Majesty the Queen, this is no longer a purely private family matter. The Duke and Duchess of Sussex have traduced not only their own family but also our constitution, the fabric of British socitety and the people of the United Kingdom and the Commonwealth. They have deliberately exposed us to vilification from around the world and incited division where previously there has been cooperation and commitment to improvement for the common good, of which we should be proud. They have justified this action with a catalogue of lies, cruelly brought before the public in the US and worldwide for maximum humiliation and personal financial gain. It is simply not acceptable that they should be permitted to do this from a position of British royal status.
Meghan and Harry have chosen for themselves a path which is incompatible with their retention of royal status. Royal status should be reserved for those individuals who assist the Monarch in fulfilling the Monarch’s role. That role is to sustain our hereditary constitutional monarchy, uphold our values (including integrity, free speech, fairness and natural justice) and act as the glue which binds us together within the UK and with the people of the Commonwealth, presenting our best face to the world and facilitating shared problem solving and mutual support. It is a role which necessarily comes with obligations and constraints – so, for example, it is by its nature a role which is in the public eye, which cannot be done in secrecy or under standard terms of employment, because it takes precedence over other interests. It cannot be combined with political activism, accepting freebies or making commercial deals for personal financial gain where conflicts of interest cannot be avoided. In return for this undoubtedly onerous commitment to public service, we bestow on royal persons significant wealth, privilege and opportunity.
Any and all persons with royal status should believe in the role, undertake the obligations with enthusiasm and be prepared to observe the inherent constraints. Harry and Meghan clearly do not – they have told us as much and that is their choice. The Queen, with the assistance of Parliament as necessary, should therefore remove all of their royal status – by which I mean titles, place in the succession (both Harry and his offspring), and any continuing funding from the Crown Estates or British taxpayer.
Yours sincerely etc
Also one podcast end of december and we are almost end of march and still nothing new? Like why? i wouldn't listen to anyway but that seems quite strange.
- Status