#teamqueen UKOut of curiosity... where is everyone from? Seems like everyone from the US is team Harry and megs whilst U.K isn’t
![United Kingdom :flag_gb: 🇬🇧](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f1ec-1f1e7.png)
![United Kingdom :flag_gb: 🇬🇧](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f1ec-1f1e7.png)
![United Kingdom :flag_gb: 🇬🇧](https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/gh/joypixels/emoji-assets@5.0/png/64/1f1ec-1f1e7.png)
#teamqueen UKOut of curiosity... where is everyone from? Seems like everyone from the US is team Harry and megs whilst U.K isn’t
No, won’t be him.And at the CoA is it correct that it wont be Warby overseeing it?
I think this is why she is doing the first part of the interview in her own. Can you imagine her talking about his family while he sits there squirming?None of this adds up. Looking at the James Interview on the bus Harry is almost warm about his grandma and grandad. Why, then does he allow her to disrespect his family like this when he knows full well what it’s like being in the royal family and knew from day one she would be monitored to a certain extent and he must have told her that her life would be completely different? That she would be limited on what she could say and not have social media. Why is she surprised? That’s part of the ‘job’ so to speak. Why is he letting her say all this crap? It’s not a shock to him that this is how the royal family behave. Why be so endearing towards his family in his interview but let her rip them apart in the other? It already has a completely different tone.
It feels like she only entered the royal family so she could have her say on it. She was already preparing an interview BEFORE the wedding but “not allowed” - well she should have fucked off then if things were so bad![]()
Yes, it will be a different judgeAnd at the CoA is it correct that it wont be Warby overseeing it?
What has "she won" Yes, lots of people are talking about her, she wanted to break the internet! As an old person I don't have a clue what this means! She's getting a front page apology but let's wait and see what that means.PLEASE HELP! I’m beginning to lose faith. Really think with the perpetual onslaught of slanderous allegations against the RF, she’ll be able to turn even those who support the RF.
As a true narcissist she is able to make her side of things sound so convincing, but even I thought she’d lose the court case, now the MoS are printing a front page it’s making me really concerned.
when I was talking (ranting!) to my husband he said “well she’s won anyway!” And he was right in many respects, because EVERYONE is talking about her. The press is full of them and all these statements are out there, and because the RF never makes comment on things, her now infamous narcissistic last word on everything almost has the power to make things TRUE.
SO PLEASE! Fellow tattlers, help me see that this interview will be a complete disaster for H&M. When the world is on it’s knees with COVID the idea that such an incredible institution is under very real threat from such a venomous creature really upsets me.
Me too. Thank u next. Back to the actual show.Am I the only one who really doesn't care if it is 'Archie'?![]()
I think the photos are old, no-one is wearing a mask, the pictures are surely pre-pandemic, nothing adds up really....I don't think that's Archie, neither do I care, but that looks like one of her older noses.
Wtf is wrong with Smeggy's arms? They've stretchedHer “friend” silvertreedirector just posted a photo of Archie on her Instagram
Exactly.I’m a lawyer (not in privacy/human rights) but I still can’t understand how the judge came to the decision to award summary judgment based on the particular facts of that case. How could he definitively decide about MM’s legitimate expectation of privacy without (a) hearing evidence from the Palace staff about the degree of input into the letter (b) hearing evidence from the 5 ‘People friends’ about what Smeggy told them about the letter (c) hearing evidence from Thomas Markle about his legitimate reasons for disclosing the letter to the press and, most importantly (d) hearing cross-examination of MM about why she shared the letter with staff and her friends, why she wrote it in calligraphy (because she knew it would get published), why it is written to emphasise how amazing she is (because she knew it would get published) and why she thought her father would keep it private when the whole point of the letter was about how her father couldn’t keep away from the press.
Why shouldn’t her father give a letter addressed to him to the press if he wants to?? This is not a normal situation of a private citizen sending a letter to another private citizen, there is far more to it, and not to acknowledge that in the judgment seems really odd, as does refusing leave to appeal and this bullshit about having to print a massive retraction to Smeggy on the front page. None of it makes sense, it feels like someone is pulling strings behind the scenes. I really hope the MoS do seek leave to appeal from the Court of Appeal and get it, so that this case can be dealt with properly, I for one would love to see Smeggy squirming in the witness box.
Also, the letter is basically written to say to her father “we’re done” and to cut him off. Lovely. You can see why Smeggy would take exception to someone using the press to artificially bolster their own image and make a load of cash at the expense of their family. One act of compassion at a time, eh?