He's going to win isn’t he, little tit.I’ve just spotted this - the directions we’re clearly handed down and again he is disregarding what doesn’t suit him or his narrative
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
If I was the Mirror Group lawyer I’d be trying to work “if The Duck had bothered to come today as instructed“ into every sentence.
It's a terrible bleeping look for Mirror Group that their journalists and editors aren't going on the stand frankly. That's why I think Harry will win the case.
found this on twitter 
"Raunchy Rachel". I like that!
We'll have "The end of Raunchy Rachel" as thread title when it happens - it's absolutely perfect!
Thank you for the explanation. So it works the opposite of a Test match? Wouldn't they be able to have more time with him tomorrow? Should have had him up today and tomorrow. I vaguely remember the stories of the conditions of certain night watchmen (cricket) overnight. Sparry would have enjoyed it
---
Sparry seems to have taken legal advice from Heard
The hubby's side of the family have slightly webbed feet so I have two children with their second and third toe slightly webbed. They don't swim an better for it
Thank goodness I taught them all how to keep their feet looking on point unlike Smeg's Mum
AIUI, “directed“ is legalese for “directed to appear”, meaning that you will appear at the date/time specified.
They reprinted stories from other publications from the day before & presumably can prove it, how could they guess that some loon would argue they were from hacking?
Still, there’s some spare time today now…
Just another example of one rule for us and one rule for the elite. If we hadn't bothered to show up to court when we were due to give evidence the case would be tossed out, we would be in contempt and fined or potentially imprisoned.
M lies and gets away with her. Her mate scoobie lies and gets away with it.
H doesn't even bother showing at court. How can anything be more contemptuous that that and all that happens it that the judge 'expresses surprise'.
I am bleeping sick of them. He is only who he is due to an accident of birth. He isn't clever. He isn't talented. He has no discernable skills or usefulness in life yet he is allowed to get away with this tit over and over again with no consequence.
M lies and gets away with her. Her mate scoobie lies and gets away with it.
H doesn't even bother showing at court. How can anything be more contemptuous that that and all that happens it that the judge 'expresses surprise'.
I am bleeping sick of them. He is only who he is due to an accident of birth. He isn't clever. He isn't talented. He has no discernable skills or usefulness in life yet he is allowed to get away with this tit over and over again with no consequence.
So the Telegraph are reporting Reek showed up this morning?
Using a March photo?
What is going on?!
Using a March photo?
What is going on?!
In Hindi we say "Main karoon toh saala character dheela hai", and that's ... accurate.
(Transl.: If I do it, I'm said to have a loose character)
Context: It's a line in a song about how others keep having multiple affairs but if the hero/his friend do it then they are accused of having loose morals. We now apply it to basically any such unfair situation where one is being singled out for something that others also do without any consequences or anyone batting an eyelid.
They were smoking with Bristle Head? Or maybe they also applied the Elizabeth Arden cream
If they got it from other papers don’t they have a reasonable expectation that it is legitimate in the same way Dan Wooten had a legitimate reason to believe Johnny Depp was a wife beater - I know different points of law but a paper can’t be expected to assume all other newspapers obtain stories illegally?
Oh it'll be a defining moment alright...just not in the way he thinks!
Oh gawd it's the Independent isn't it?!
Where did I get Telegraph from?!
Hurrying off to clean the bathroom where no-one can see my red face
When HG met harrys wife. Starting shortly
From my understanding, reprinting stories in good faith, particularly with a reasonable expectation that the other publication would have carried out due diligence and obtained information legally, may not cut it anymore.
And particularly in Sparry's case, when he has been oh so vocal and the previous cases have established that the papers gossip about him and Smegs, and have previously obtained a 'private' letter and printed enough of it to be deemed as 'too much', then I think the judge might pull up the newspaper for not taking especial care.
Maybe they are cleverer than we thought
maybe they'll markle themselves again
If he wins he wins. He’ll need the money to pay for his security after all.
But a bit like the Johnny Depp case - it doesn’t matter what the judge rules really, it’s the court of popular opinion that really matters.
But it’s not a great start is it? I mean if I was going to sue somebody, and refused all settlement offers and was determined to take them through the courts, you wouldn’t be able to keep me away from the first day. Not showing up is not a great look. Clearly he was never taught the importance of first impressions.
Or maybe he just turned up 3 days early by accident
But a bit like the Johnny Depp case - it doesn’t matter what the judge rules really, it’s the court of popular opinion that really matters.
But it’s not a great start is it? I mean if I was going to sue somebody, and refused all settlement offers and was determined to take them through the courts, you wouldn’t be able to keep me away from the first day. Not showing up is not a great look. Clearly he was never taught the importance of first impressions.
Or maybe he just turned up 3 days early by accident
- Status