There's a guy on quora wrote about it herehttps://themarkles.quora.com/I-really-miss-Sunshine-Sachs-I-mean-the-Muppet-doing-it-now-always-recycles-the-same-name-Doesn-t-even-bother-to-use https://themarkles.quora.com/I-real...7&share=baf44f41&srid=uyPw62&target_type=post
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Harry comes face to face with a leopard in Botswana 
"I was thinking about Mummy.
That leopard was clearly a sign from her, a messenger she’d sent to say:
All is well. And all will be well."
"I was thinking about Mummy.
That leopard was clearly a sign from her, a messenger she’d sent to say:
All is well. And all will be well."
I can actually hear that broadcast
Can't recall who it was, but we had this one cricket player whose English was pretty good, but during the post-match presentations he would start talking in a monotone-ish with no punctuation, and would just get faster and faster excellent player so he was up there a lot. We could get him to do it 
I'm still pretty upset about my friend, especially with the details she gave me later. Basically met the guy online, he lovebombed her, wanted parents to meet and get the roka (a pre-engagement engagement that's basically like yeah we like this person and family so neither party will look for more matches) done after just a week of chatting. Friend and guy met once, parents met separately, then less than two months after they started chatting, parents met to decide details of roka where guy's parents asked for gifts for their relatives - all that wedding shite I was talking about a couple of days ago. She called out the guy over texts later, but he got angry at her so she called things off. I saw the screenshots - the manipulation and gaslighting...Smegs-level almost! And the guy's family is quite well-off so it's not like they're struggling and need the money or anything. I spent the entire evening trying to convince my friend not to fall for the gaslighting - she was actually thinking that she was rude and shouldn't have said anything or should have approached him more gently. Which is absolute bullshit. Have cautioned her against talking to him again because now they'll try to manipulate her family into apologising and giving in and accepting all their demands and more.
I don't understand what sorcery these grifters do. This is an educated, working woman who has seen so much emotional and financial abuse all her life, has seen me deal with this groom-hunting shite and experienced some of it before herself, yet she fell for the lovebombing. And in spite of hard evidence that he was complicit in demanding dowry, she believed that he was not. He'd convinced her that their less than two months of chatting constituted a committed relationship and that they were in love. He'd even told her that he'd walked out of an earlier engagement because the bride's mother said something (was basically making it clear that he would not hesitate to create a scene and ruin her reputation), and while talking further I made my friend realise that he was planning to enmesh her further (and maybe blackmail her) by making her be intimate with him before marriage (still a huge deal in our families). Just keeping my fingers crossed that she stays away from him.
With Sparry I'm pretty sure that he found an ideal partner to take his family down in Smegs, but still even to get to that stage, TW must have some amazing entrancing powers. God save us from grifting narcs!
Agreed. The “overflow” room where the service will be live-streamed. Kinda like if you’re late for the Christmas service and the church pews were full, you get to sit in parish hall with the service piped in through speakers.
Harry and Meghan #304 - She's Just Quiet About Harry!
TW allegedly learned some tricks a la Wallis Simpson during her alleged time at sea/in the marina and at Slappo House.I can actually hear that broadcast
I'm still pretty upset about my friend, especially with the details she gave me later. Basically met the guy online, he lovebombed her, wanted parents to meet and get the roka (a pre-engagement engagement that's basically like yeah we like this person and family so neither party will look for more matches) done after just a week of chatting. Friend and guy met once, parents met separately, then less than two months after they started chatting, parents met to decide details of roka where guy's parents asked for gifts for their relatives - all that wedding shite I was talking about a couple of days ago. She called out the guy over texts later, but he got angry at her so she called things off. I saw the screenshots - the manipulation and gaslighting...Smegs-level almost! And the guy's family is quite well-off so it's not like they're struggling and need the money or anything. I spent the entire evening trying to convince my friend not to fall for the gaslighting - she was actually thinking that she was rude and shouldn't have said anything or should have approached him more gently. Which is absolute bullshit. Have cautioned her against talking to him again because now they'll try to manipulate her family into apologising and giving in and accepting all their demands and more.
I don't understand what sorcery these grifters do. This is an educated, working woman who has seen so much emotional and financial abuse all her life, has seen me deal with this groom-hunting shite and experienced some of it before herself, yet she fell for the lovebombing. And in spite of hard evidence that he was complicit in demanding dowry, she believed that he was not. He'd convinced her that their less than two months of chatting constituted a committed relationship and that they were in love. He'd even told her that he'd walked out of an earlier engagement because the bride's mother said something (was basically making it clear that he would not hesitate to create a scene and ruin her reputation), and while talking further I made my friend realise that he was planning to enmesh her further (and maybe blackmail her) by making her be intimate with him before marriage (still a huge deal in our families). Just keeping my fingers crossed that she stays away from him.
With Sparry I'm pretty sure that he found an ideal partner to take his family down in Smegs, but still even to get to that stage, TW must have some amazing entrancing powers. God save us from grifting narcs!
Oh no! They moved his salmon fillets to another aisle! And he wondered if it was legal!
Has he ever actually been inside a supermarket?
Has he ever actually been inside a supermarket?
quick - where's the eye-bleach .. !!!!
Attachments
What you wrote might happen in an ideal world worlld, but not with the Harkles. Any capitulation by KC will be touted from the rooftops that Harry has bested all of them. Harry will crow that he was right and everything he did and wrote was true. That his family were/are racist and he needed to tell the world. They insulted his wife and now they need to beg her forgiveness. That he is better, more important and respected than any of them.
Forget it. If the Windsors give into them they will have totally lost face and respect. They will be seen as a big pussy family
Could he be referring to that (quickly deleted) announcement that they used a surrogate? Where was that…was it on one of the RF accounts?
I also loved Harry and Meghan Thread #304: Oedipus Wrecks whoever came up with that one!
And I think there was another brilliant one I’ve forgotten, will see if I can rummage around my brain for it, my memory is a bit like Sparry’s!
Demanding an apology while refusing to elaborate i.e. "they know why" is standard narc stuff.
It makes the narc look like the victim. The real victim(s) is then viewed with suspicion because they are refusing (quite rightly) to acknowledge that they've done anything wrong and/or apologise. Sometimes they aren't even aware that the narc is telling others that they expect an apology.
Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.
I will not assume that 25 or 43 deserve an apology from the RF unless I see the full account of why giving both sides and specific details.
I've been on the receiving end of that behavior. I will not inflict it on someone else.
It makes the narc look like the victim. The real victim(s) is then viewed with suspicion because they are refusing (quite rightly) to acknowledge that they've done anything wrong and/or apologise. Sometimes they aren't even aware that the narc is telling others that they expect an apology.
Been there, done that, got the t-shirt.
I will not assume that 25 or 43 deserve an apology from the RF unless I see the full account of why giving both sides and specific details.
I've been on the receiving end of that behavior. I will not inflict it on someone else.
Just leaving this here ...
Hamsters and hairy Harry's are on topic, riiiight?
Watching one of my favourite horror/comedy movies to set my mood right before I sleep. Smegs isn't fit to play even the witch in this film.
Hamsters and hairy Harry's are on topic, riiiight?
Watching one of my favourite horror/comedy movies to set my mood right before I sleep. Smegs isn't fit to play even the witch in this film.
The Crypt/ Bargain Basement?
Just watching the three Meghan and Harry TV movies. Terrific casting
I always feel really bad for Wallis that people make this kind of horrible comment about her. She was trapped in an impossible situation with a useless man she didn’t love, being universally hated, in an era in which there wasn’t really any escape or support or empathy for a woman in her position. She had respect for the RF, didn’t want Edward to abdicate, didn’t want to be queen, and would certainly have preferred not to be in the situation in which she found herself which I think would have been very lonely and actually quite frightening. She did her best with where she ended up in life. Wallis was no Meghan Markle.TW allegedly learned some tricks a la Wallis Simpson during her alleged time at sea/in the marina and at Slappo House.
Honestly I think it's either spin from Harry's camp, or, putting on more of a tin foil hat for a moment, the RF could be putting out feelers to see how the public would react. Most people will be like "no way!". The security risk alone would be a great reason not to have them there. At this point public feeling is against them so strongly that I can't see any advantages to them being there, for themselves. Also Meghan has supposedly removed from her IMdb profile, the reference to her pending coronation appearance, but I don't know how true that is.
- Status