The original judge, based on the way things turned out, got it spot on. What I can’t get my head around is the fact that one judge actually believed him
So the way the British system works, 10 judges can say no, but if one says yes than that supersedes all previous judgements? Even if that judge, inarguably in this case, is a bit of a moron.
Fucked up beyond belief.
---
So I expect the usual suspects to come running in to demand the immediate removal of all asylum seekers. “Amongst the most vulnerable people in out society (tm)”. The people they “care” for so much about it hurts. The people they are determined should “access services” and be given “due process”. Surely they should be demanding their immediate removal to a place of safety where they can flourish and become paramedics?
They after all respect the decisions made in law. Particularly those made in the blessed EU where things are always 6000 times better than the UK. How can anyone with such a highly developed and rigorously displayed sense of virtue stand by and watch these unfortunate people be persecuted in a country where they face mobs of roaming far right thugs standing on street corners indiscriminately murdering anyone they suspect.
How can they? Unless of course they are complete hypocrites who‘s true aim is something much more sinister…..