She’s been spotted at target lots of times always with her handlers.
Yes definitely, I agree with thisExactly, so surely members of the public or the employees of that place have had some level of interaction with her. Like, you don't think the employees of that target aren't watching her like a bleeping hawk when she comes in??? If she was nonfunctional, there'd be gossip about it. Even if her handlers are with her, I think people would be able to notice what level of functionality she has just by watching her interact with the handlers at the very least.
I think it would be too difficult to get ndas for like the whole staff of a department store. Such high turnover too, they'd never know who they'd had ndas from already. And that's just one store of likely more that she gets to go to.This may sound crazy but I’d bet they have to sign ndas or something.
I literally can not wait for the day her youngest son turns 18.
Any highlights you can share? I don't have extra podcast time atmThis podcast with a lawyer who's done a deep dive into the court docs was quite interesting:
Google Podcasts
podcasts.google.com
It's very general, the lawyer isn't involved in the case, just someone with an interest and the knowledge to understand the court docs. The Britney section is only half an hour. She said something must have happened to prompt Britney wanting to remove Jamie (possibly the incident with her kids), as she had never raised any issue with him being her conservator in all the years previous. If she is lucid enough to make that call, and lucid enough to understand her only value and power is in performing and her refusing to perform is the only way she can assert her power, then she isn't really in the scope of how a conservatorship should be applied. She explains what conservatorships are for and why it's so hard to get out of one (they are only usually used when someone is not expected to get better, but it's really not clear that this applies to Britney). She confirms that the court is seemingly very open to a motion to remove Jamie as conservator further down the line, but this joint-conservator situation needs to have been in place for a while so that Bessemer Trust (the new joint conservator) can get a handle on everything first - they will be going through all her financials and making sure there's no irregularities that come back to Jamie. Apparently there's a clause stating she has no right to know who her business manager even is - that's for the conservator only. Lots more interesting nuggets, can't remember them all.Any highlights you can share? I don't have extra podcast time atm
I'm hoping the BBC one is more revealing than the other oneI’m just waiting for someone to leak something supporting Britney I’m hoping soon .
Jamie won’t be pleased at all someone on the team has messed up.How utterly bizarre that of all the pictures she could use that her Instagram post for her sisters birthday includes Justin...