Spencer was convinced KT was sleeping with Jeremy (the guy he referred to as a fat drunken slob).Jeremy used to be roommates with Sara, who at the time was with the FreshBaked channel and was bestie with Katie. I imagine Katie would visit their place often, fueling Spencer's suspicions of her and Jeremy. As it was, he was upset with Katie for being friendly with the "competition" and kick her off the channel for a time. Wondering if history will repeat itself?
Dylan looked uncomfortable in all the photos as well, but maybe that's just his look??? He's no doubt heard BLAB tit talk Jeremy for years. Jeremy was before Dylan's time with BLAB. I remember Spence took Jeremy to tapings of Talking Dead years ago, and would post photos of him in the audienceSpencer wasn't happy looking in any of those "work" photos. More like put out that he had to take them. She was there because he is too proud to face the truth and can't stand to see us be right. I get why she would bring Bob's Big Boy, he was her ride. The other guy?
I want to learn more. Anyone got a link (if it still exists)?Jeremy's feeble channel
Dylan knows he’s being judged by the company he keepsDylan looked uncomfortable in all the photos as well, but maybe that's just his look??? He's no doubt heard BLAB tit talk Jeremy for years. Jeremy was before Dylan's time with BLAB. I remember Spence took Jeremy to tapings of Talking Dead years ago, and would post photos of him in the audience
Hahaha haha Ooh Lalo I love your creativity.
When I complained in writing to Disney about BLAB live-streaming my granddaughter, they just ignored me. I sent another complaint. After almost 3 months I got a “we are sorry the behavior of other park guests made you uncomfortable, we take your concerns seriously and have forwarded them to the appropriate department”. I replied that they aren’t park guests, they are a commercial filming business operating on Disney property to profit from filming the actual guests without their permission. Specifically live-streaming children and to please have the appropriate department contact me. I never got another response.Let me ask you guys your opinion on this. It was just thinking about something that hasn’t come up that I’ve seen.
The constitution protects our freedom of speech and part of that means filming in public is allowed since there is no expectation of privacy in public. However, commercial film crews require permits to film and for people appearing on camera to sign waivers. And if no waiver as was likely the case at the theater where the talking dead thing happened, they put up disclaimers on your way in stating that you may appear on film etc etc…
Now, the Disney parks are private property. While the people in the background of these vlogs are technically in “public” but they are on a private property they paid admission to go into. If someone were to sue a vlogger for capturing them on their video against their permission and broadcasting it, and also profiting from said broadcast, would that person have a case? Disney is allowing people to take photo and video in the parks and they don’t require permits or permission the way they would with say the Christmas parade film crew. But, the YouTubers are technically commercial productions seeing as they receive money for videos produced and broadcast.
Disney benefits from these dolts by way of free marketing and obviously by their invitations to events and experiences Disney accepts their activities and encourages them to a degree.
At what point does private become public with no sense of privacy and at what point can we take action to stop these buttholes from filming innocent people who are eating meals or waiting in lines etc…?
The whole disney profits off the youtubers and its free advertisement is what the youtubers like to say. They parks would still be busy without this free advertisement, Like it was years before all these freeloaders started filming. Disney doesnt need free advertisement its just what the vloggers say to justify and make what they doing ok..Let me ask you guys your opinion on this. It was just thinking about something that hasn’t come up that I’ve seen.
The constitution protects our freedom of speech and part of that means filming in public is allowed since there is no expectation of privacy in public. However, commercial film crews require permits to film and for people appearing on camera to sign waivers. And if no waiver as was likely the case at the theater where the talking dead thing happened, they put up disclaimers on your way in stating that you may appear on film etc etc…
Now, the Disney parks are private property. While the people in the background of these vlogs are technically in “public” but they are on a private property they paid admission to go into. If someone were to sue a vlogger for capturing them on their video against their permission and broadcasting it, and also profiting from said broadcast, would that person have a case? Disney is allowing people to take photo and video in the parks and they don’t require permits or permission the way they would with say the Christmas parade film crew. But, the YouTubers are technically commercial productions seeing as they receive money for videos produced and broadcast.
Disney benefits from these dolts by way of free marketing and obviously by their invitations to events and experiences Disney accepts their activities and encourages them to a degree.
At what point does private become public with no sense of privacy and at what point can we take action to stop these buttholes from filming innocent people who are eating meals or waiting in lines etc…?
Will take a little digging.I want to learn more. Anyone got a link (if it still exists)?
It's not linked on his "Public Figure" IG account.Will take a little digging.
KT's favorite "no filter" filter with her mane perfectly positioned and head correctly angled for the ultimate skinny face look..
Maybe he will now join the BLOBs on their channel.It's not linked on his "Public Figure" IG account.