Oh Christ, in two years I’ll be dust…dust…no one will know who I am…dust…ham dust…
Oh yeah she’s definitely full of tit, this is just what she’s implyingI find this hard to believe. I think she thought she was influential and intelligent enough to persuade everyone he was ok and now that’s clearly failed she’s making out she’s a karen in shining armour. She’s so full of tit I can smell it from here.
I agree, we definitely need to be careful we're not twisting words. But her response was still pretty damning and to me seemed to be of the same sort of sentiment as "its OK cos my kids are boys"I don't agree with what she's doing at all and paul is a n0nce who can rot for all I care but this is literally not what she said and idk why people in her live are purposefully twisting it. she was asked "why are you allowing him around your children that you know he's attracted to" and her only response was to clarify "I dont have a daughter, I only have sons and as far as I am aware he is only attracted to women"
so many people in her live are either misunderstanding or hearing something they want to but she never said she didn't care, just that the comment was wrong because she doesn't have daughters
just clarifying it because it's happened before where someone will misinterpret something paul has said and it gets spread around as fact
(obviously everyone can interpret what she said differently etc etc)
ETA: someone has just said "surely you know there's no smoke without fire" and she said she agreed? so why would you want to be friends with him? I don't get what her goal is at all
Dunno, he was already "madly in love" with a child in 2007, maybe it has relevance to that?He seems to think this whole “I was in Lincoln for a year in 2006” thing is a revelation that we’re all going to be shocked by, but I’m genuinely lost and confused… can anyone explain this to me?
I wonder if it’s him saying he couldn’t have got her pregnant at 16 if that was 2006 since he was in Lincoln?Dunno, he was already "madly in love" with a child in 2007, maybe it has relevance to that?
Yeah to be honest, anyone giving that n0nce any money is a bleeping idiot. If they saw him in the street would they throw a fiver at his head?I wonder if it’s him saying he couldn’t have got her pregnant at 16 if that was 2006 since he was in Lincoln?
I know the gifters/subs names are funny sometimes but I really do wish people would stop. He’s literally just said “you can put the stupid names but you’re still giving me money so keep doing it” and it’s infuriating that these people are funding him
Does she work for the BBC lolHere's what I caught from the live
View attachment 1805499
what she said was that its wrong (any grown adult being with a 16/17/18 year old etc) but literally in the eyes of the law its legaljust watching karens live.. im sure the other day she said his BM wasn't 16 when they had the baby? now shes saying its fine in the eyes of the law and he's not seen as a paedophile by the law? has something gone on here that I've missed between them or has she just changed her tune?
Lol I know, I am a nurse myself and I’m just shocked that she is a supporter of him & a nurse!She is! I know a lot of nurses, I used to work in healthcare (so by Pool’s standards I must be a great person eh). Some are angels. Some I wouldn’t trust to pick my cat’s tit up. It’s one way or the other with healthcare professionals.