Possibly someone who is potentially addictive in their nature and has already used work and income to mask things.
From what I’ve seen of Tiffany she definitely has a leaning to being addictive.
I do think she's handled exposure to morphine very responsibly (besides the driving experiment given morphine can have a long half life). But, it has not led to her using it more than is needed or developing a dependency on it. I have not seen a lot of justifications or excuses given to when or how often she uses it.
I used to sympathise with her situation. However, now I think that she’s cunning and acting stupid (to gain more pity and views) when she already knows everything abt her case. If she’s cancer free, she should throw the boomerang like she said. If she still has cancer, then she needs to do something or die prematurely. Surely her family and relatives should be more informed and could advise her on the right direction she should go.
Yes, I am trying to take into consideration how putting an audience in front of someone changes their own narrative. I think a camera can make it hard to admit when one is wrong, to vocalize a change to worsening, to resistance to post about a treatment plan that is in contrast with what subs are advocating for, etc. All this affects what she shows and even the prism in which she understands information. It can all have a powerful impact.
I thought at first this might be really good news (didn't it sound like it initially when she left the surgeon's office with Matt). Yet, they both seemed guarded, confused. She seemed genuinely shocked by the avalanche of input by subs that she get the surgery. That has turned into vagueness and a resistance to clarifying exactly what the situation actually is. And now a protracted delay.
And to stop labelling videos with things like 'blood and mucus' too.
Yes she is not very bright overall and no common sense but she is calculating in terms of youtube. She literally asks her viewers whether they watch her videos from start to finish (!!!) She might as well just ask them to not skip ads in her videos
Someone on here suggested that she should do separate videos about the cancer and separate about her silly activities so that we can just watch the cancer stuff. She will never do it as she knows that cancer is what pulls people in. That's why she never fails to put the word 'cancer' in her titles along with something overly dramatic instead of putting 'My silly ramblings about christmas trees, cozy socks, jumpers, darling Matt, and other foolishness'.
Yes she might reveal something on Thursday but it will be vague and confusing (as is she). It will last a couple of minutes and the rest will be about cooking, Matt, the garden centre ...
It's when I see this kind of manipulation, or her pulling influencer tricks ("let me know if you watch this til the end"), her video titles or her inputting the food delivery service or her repetitive WGT merch promos, I realize she is strategizing content from a commercial perspective too. And not haphazardly either, it is quite calculated and multifaceted. So, I tend to be less apt to give her the benefit of the doubt and I view the opacity and lack of clarity more suspiciously now.
Either she's afraid to publically admit a change in status because she's embarrassed or she feels it impacts people's perception of her (I have noticed she's been extremely vague about any discussion about what the proposed pelvic exenteration actually involves). Or, she feels clarifying will somehow affect viewership #'s, however she calculates that, and her popularity/revenue stream. Sadly, she's made clear how important that is to her, so it must also be taken into consideration when analyzing her behaviour.
I would think if the news was that there is NED, she would be shouting this from the rooftops, even if not quite ready to do the boomerang dance! Even if it wasn't that spectacular, but still very promising news...why wouldn't she be expressing great excitement over this dramatic change in status? Why oh why has Tiffany now become vague and nonresponsive?
That is the question: will tomorrow's video be any more illuminating, or just more of the same? Sadly, I think she's trying to transition viewers to be as enthusiastic and supportive of her life videos as her cancer journey.
I am quite resentful that she pleads poverty but flaunts her ugg slippers, coffee machines and smeg kettles amonst other things. I can't afford those (not that I would waste that amount of money anyway) and we are helping her buy them.
You can't take it with you Tiffany!!!!
Like others, I am just not that interested in watching her open gifts, arrange her house, what she's wearing or eating. She's losing her audience inputting such materialism (this is NOT a segment of Fine House & Homes!). Small fillers were fine, but when they are the majority of content or repetitive, I am no longer all in.
And when they are cinematically remixed with music, I become even less so, it is not making the content more interesting for me at all. I wonder why she's spending so much time editing her videos and trying to improve the entertainment value. They're supposed to be about her cancer journey, not making her cancer journey into as cinematically an emotional experience as she is capable of producing! THAT approach definitely influences what she presents and how she presents it. That is exactly what so much of her community does NOT want to happen, the method affecting the content itself!
Her merch have reached far and wide. Viable business...
