Hmm... her subs are still going up, 94.4k, that's up 200 since yesterday. 
- Status
New to Tattle Life? Click "Order Thread by Most Liked Posts" button below to get an idea of what the site is about:
Yes that’s why I told you I was shocked ! She wanted to be moved because someone was dying but the person dying should have been the one to get the private room ! And the infection excuse was odd too because she said someone in the ward had an infection too so that one should have been moved to a private room as well … I don’t know why she suddenly had a private room … But complaining because someone is dying is a bit entitled and not very compassionate, sure it’s difficult to hear / watch but it’s even more difficult for the person who is suffering … She knows that … Yes same thing than when she doesn’t want to see other cancer patients … And she doesn’t want to speak to anyone you’re right because she doesn’t want to answer any of their questions. She even said that she doesn´t want to know anything about what´s next, when she sees the surgeon she just want to know about what drain is going to be removed and focus on the now ( and block the rest) and she even said that she was sleeping so much in order to avoid thinking about the rest of her cancer journey she doesn´t want to know about the margins / lab and pathology results …
She can choose to not know anything her little baby brain desires, which then stands to reason that putting the word *cancer* in as a clickbait should obviously cease immediately! Surely you can’t advertise something you don’t know about?
Clearly she has a screw loose! (And a few nuts and bolts)
I've always thought that the three of them were in cahoots regarding money-making, right from the start. Tiffany will never go back to her previous career - I mean, earning thousands a month from vlogging at home versus a 9-5 hard graft five days a week - it's a no-brainer, really. All three of them are living off her advertising revenue. They've all gone massively downhill in my estimation and I have no idea why her followers are so obsessed with her because there are so many better influencers/vloggers to follow.
I think about things alot. Probably too much........ but here goes with my biggest thought.
My husband isnt in to social media and never has been. Before his disease affected him he was busy running his own business (self employed). He literally worked all day, went to the gym to socialise and train, came home, spent time with me and the kids and then went to bed. I don't think he had time for social media.
Now I think what if he did? How would he think and feel? What if his disease had been caught when he was stage 3? I know the answer. He would thank his lucky stars that he could have surgery, but he would feel guilty for all those that wasnt fortunate. If he earned cash he would give it to those patients that are stage 4 and desperate for treatment to buy extra time.
I know he is the type that would ask his viewers to go donate to others than arent so lucky.
Those spending money on Tiffany could be donate to others who are in dire need of help.
Thats what I think about alot alot alot.
My husband isnt in to social media and never has been. Before his disease affected him he was busy running his own business (self employed). He literally worked all day, went to the gym to socialise and train, came home, spent time with me and the kids and then went to bed. I don't think he had time for social media.
Now I think what if he did? How would he think and feel? What if his disease had been caught when he was stage 3? I know the answer. He would thank his lucky stars that he could have surgery, but he would feel guilty for all those that wasnt fortunate. If he earned cash he would give it to those patients that are stage 4 and desperate for treatment to buy extra time.
I know he is the type that would ask his viewers to go donate to others than arent so lucky.
Those spending money on Tiffany could be donate to others who are in dire need of help.
Thats what I think about alot alot alot.
I don't watch now but I do, obviously, come here.
There was a young girl in Australia, Natasha I think her name was, think I saw it in the paper.
Anyway, she passed away recently but her journey compared to Tiffany's was inspiring. So open and honest about everything happening to her.
Actually I think her story was what prompted me to stop following T.
There was a young girl in Australia, Natasha I think her name was, think I saw it in the paper.
Anyway, she passed away recently but her journey compared to Tiffany's was inspiring. So open and honest about everything happening to her.
Actually I think her story was what prompted me to stop following T.
I am in agreement, too.
She infantilises Tiffany and is in a codependent relationship. None of this is healthy for Tiffany or promotes strong independence and mature survival skills. She has raised a child into a 30 year old child who needs to be taken care of, not a contributing proud member of society, family member or partner. Just the fact that Tiffany openly states she needs time off from family and friends is indicative of nonreciprocal relationships: she wants "time off" from the people who should be supporting her! Not to take on the responsibilities for herself, but instead, it places even more burden on the two who already shoulder so much and who baby her. Her relationships appear very one-sided with all the efforts flowing towards Tiffany. I have never heard her mum put up any resistance, refusal or a single word of complaint, not even a raised eyebrow, at Tiffany's infantile behaviour.
I'm sure Amma would lay down her life for her daughter, and it must be torturous to see her so seriously ill. But even for the benefit of Amma's own physical wellbeing, Tiffany needs to be given opportunities to stand on her own wherever she can, and feel the self worth and pride in that. I can't imagine Matt's burden if Amma becomes ill. Tiffany has no interest in taking care of herself and has not shown any interest in learning how. Matt and Amma have enabled this learned helplessness in her.
Yes, she was happy for the publicity onto herself, but has done so little to use her spotlight to help others. That is such a shame. Tiffany doesn't see others with cancer as anything but a blight on her own mental health, an irritant to her.
Very well said!I am in agreement, too.
She infantilises Tiffany and is in a codependent relationship. None of this is healthy for Tiffany or promotes strong independence and mature survival skills. She has raised a child into a 30 year old child who needs to be taken care of, not a contributing proud member of society, family member or partner. Just the fact that Tiffany openly states she needs time off from family and friends is indicative of nonreciprocal relationships: she wants "time off" from the people who should be supporting her! Not to take on the responsibilities for herself, but instead, it places even more burden on the two who already shoulder so much and who baby her. Her relationships appear very one-sided with all the efforts flowing towards Tiffany. I have never heard her mum put up any resistance, refusal or a single word of complaint, not even a raised eyebrow, at Tiffany's infantile behaviour.
I'm sure Amma would lay down her life for her daughter, and it must be torturous to see her so seriously ill. But even for the benefit of Amma's own physical wellbeing, Tiffany needs to be given opportunities to stand on her own wherever she can, and feel the self worth and pride in that. I can't imagine Matt's burden if Amma becomes ill. Tiffany has no interest in taking care of herself and has not shown any interest in learning how. Matt and Amma have enabled this learned helplessness in her.
Yes, she was happy for the publicity onto herself, but has done so little to use her spotlight to help others. That is such a shame. Tiffany doesn't see others with cancer as anything but a blight on her own mental health, an irritant to her.
came across this video today
Thats true Suze. I know Tiffany is aware of other cancer vloggers because I have seen her leave comments on their channels, but not once as she mentioned them. Probably too scared she will lose some of the viewers that she has amassed.I am in agreement, too.
She infantilises Tiffany and is in a codependent relationship. None of this is healthy for Tiffany or promotes strong independence and mature survival skills. She has raised a child into a 30 year old child who needs to be taken care of, not a contributing proud member of society, family member or partner. Just the fact that Tiffany openly states she needs time off from family and friends is indicative of nonreciprocal relationships: she wants "time off" from the people who should be supporting her! Not to take on the responsibilities for herself, but instead, it places even more burden on the two who already shoulder so much and who baby her. Her relationships appear very one-sided with all the efforts flowing towards Tiffany. I have never heard her mum put up any resistance, refusal or a single word of complaint, not even a raised eyebrow, at Tiffany's infantile behaviour.
I'm sure Amma would lay down her life for her daughter, and it must be torturous to see her so seriously ill. But even for the benefit of Amma's own physical wellbeing, Tiffany needs to be given opportunities to stand on her own wherever she can, and feel the self worth and pride in that. I can't imagine Matt's burden if Amma becomes ill. Tiffany has no interest in taking care of herself and has not shown any interest in learning how. Matt and Amma have enabled this learned helplessness in her.
Yes, she was happy for the publicity onto herself, but has done so little to use her spotlight to help others. That is such a shame. Tiffany doesn't see others with cancer as anything but a blight on her own mental health, an irritant to her.
Now some of those that Tiffany followed was pleaing for help to pay for private treatments (which I will touch on soon). T could have easily asked her viewers if they would like to help others much less fortunate.
Now back to paying for the private treatments..... I had no idea of any of this until my husband was diagnosed and referred to medical oncology to start treatment.
When we first met the oncologist he told us that they have several treatments for his type of cancer. It was upto the oncologist to decide which 3 to select for my husband and how to sequence them. So, there is first line, second line & 3rd line treatment. A total of 3 treatments. NICE only allow some to be used as first line and some to be used after first line. This means that the oncologist has to choose wisely.
At that point his oncologist told us the plan as in which treatments he felt may benefit him, and in what order they would be used.
I had a burning question at that very first appointment that I wanted to ask, but I was too scared to ask. I feared the answer.
"If there is potentially 15 treatments, why can he only try 3"?
His first treatment was immunotherapy and he had a great reaction to it. It worked great, but eventually his disease got smart and outwitted treatment. On to number 2. It did nothing! 12 weeks later we was told it had not worked. On to number 3.......... Again, 12 weeks later scans confirmed it had done nothing!
At this point I asked the burning question. "Can my husband try some of the other treatments?" and we got a big fat resounding NO. "NICE won't fund further lines of treatment"
It didn't matter that he was young and relatively well (still working and going to the gym). His 'oncology performance status' was 90% which basically means he was active and unaffected by disease.
We appealed to NICE via the oncologist and it was declined. No funding after 3 treatments.
Now this is heartbreaking but I understand. Some of the treatments cost £6k per month! His 1st line funded treatment was very expensive.
This left us with trials sponsored by manufacturers and funding our own treatment. We ended up travelling from the UK to Germany because it was cheaper at the clinic in Germany.
Eventually all treatments stopped working and he was discharged from oncology and referred to palliative care at the hospice.
If he develops a particular nasty bone met he would be allowed 'palliative radiotherapy', but the NHS arent allowed to actively treat his disease due to funding.
When we see stage 4 vloggers saying they have been told there is nothing else left, its true. And its why we see go fund me's because people have to self fund treatments.
A harsh reality of our NHS, but I understand we can't fund everything for everyone.
T probably doesnt know any of this because she isn't stage 4 (although they mentioned if she had spread no surgery would be offered). However, T does see other cancer vloggers desperate to raise money for treatment.
It would be nice of Tiffany to ask her viewers to help others? I have seen her viewers offer to pay for private treatment, holidays etc. Imagine the difference T could make to someone stage 4? How rewarding would it feel, knowing she is helping someone less fortunate?
T says she feels lucky to be at the royal marsden and feels lucky to be given surgery because many never get the chance. Many die! Its a fact! I know she recognises that she is lucky. Yet she will dramatise videos, crave attention from people who possibly could help desperate people and she will make demands such as crying to get another biopsy done quickly. Stage 4 patients are waiting for biopsies too. The private room, crying because she didnt like being on a ward? Others on wards are just happy to be getting help.
this was posted some time ago....I guess she is trying to get clicks using TT.....bunch of nonsense. A YTuber with under 1000 subs and on this video almost 6000 views that she would never have gotten. Disgusting.
No this is one of T's super fans. She comments on all T's videos and tags T in pictures.
Remember T does private chat with some of her fans, she has said in a few of her videos that she misses direct messaging them.
I always thought this, didn’t want to get attacked.. but Amma rubs me the wrong way. She is a primary reason as to why t is the way she is. She never allowed t to grow up.. always coddled and babied her, giving her ridiculous false hope ‘no biopsy because the tumour is gone’ 
The whole family is the same. In October (before the scans) Elodie told Tiffany "What if they do the scans and discover that the cancer is gone, and you're completely healthy".giving her ridiculous false hope ‘no biopsy because the tumour is gone’
And remember Matt's "the reward is worth the risk" and "after the surgery you'll never think of cancer ever again, for the rest of your life, and you'll forget you ever had it"
As a mother I have always given her the benefit of the doubt with some of the behavior shown. What I have assumed right or wrong is that when camera not on she takes on a more forceful role and not so passive. She does I think have a language issue and assume much discussion and family interaction with her is in their language. Clearly the entire group is playing TT's game with YT for whatever reasons but behind the scenes we really don't know. Curious to see if Matt is back today. Amma raised her family without benefit of her husband being around. Really don't know what the set up there was. I think we might be surprised to see her in real life and not a chief juicer/driver and hair brusher.I always thought this, didn’t want to get attacked.. but Amma rubs me the wrong way. She is a primary reason as to why t is the way she is. She never allowed t to grow up.. always coddled and babied her, giving her ridiculous false hope ‘no biopsy because the tumour is gone’
---
the "whole family" consists of some aunts/uncles and cousins a number of which I think are fairly well educated and professional. They all seem to live in nice homes. I don't think the "whole family" necessarily was on board with some of the decisions made. I can't figure Elodie out...and my opinion on Matt has been stated many times on TT (back in the day) and on TL. He was a major problem when the W and W decision was made.
They all came to visit Tiffany in her house 2 weeks before her surgery. No masks, of course, no one was worried she could catch covid or flu. It seems her doctor cousin wasn't there though. The rest of them, it seems, don't have much medical knowledge.
the lack of precautions in advance of surgery is beyond my understanding. In the CCU video at the beginning Elodie was right in her face no mask. Is this some belief that a higher power will take care of everything and we don't have to worry or follow rules? I don't know other than I have seen that here in US during covid. I don't know how they avoided covid over the last year.
Boy I do not recommend watching today's edition. Not even worthy of a recap. but she did mention the high rate of infection in UK right now covid and other and in comes Amma and Matt (I think just back from a trip) with no masks. It is mind boggling.
In the beginning of the video: "I can't eat much now so when i get home and feel better i'll cook myself a Christmas dinner".
15 minutes later: "Matt, when i get home, will you make me the best Christmas dinner ever? Full Christmas dinner, with Yorkshire pudding and everything?"
15 minutes later: "Matt, when i get home, will you make me the best Christmas dinner ever? Full Christmas dinner, with Yorkshire pudding and everything?"
Also Nicole Coopy who was in Australia (unless that's who you mean). She was selfless and advocated for other cancer patients.
- Status