There's been a lot of discussion online over an article in the Guardian about an American "pro-natalist" couple who want to have as many children as possible. They have a very bizarre lifestyle, live in an unsafe house, and abuse the kids, so there's a lot to criticise. But I keep seeing responses about:
"lol they're 37, any kids they have after this will all have Down's Syndrome" - It is abhorrent to suggest that having a disabled child is punishment for something the parents did. Having a baby after 35 or 40 doesn't guarantee Down's Syndrome, the odds are higher but still not that high. Also the article clearly states they are doing IVF with embryos screened for disease and genetic potential (presumably harvested before mum was 32, which is when she had the first)
"At least they're not like the Quiverfull movement/religious fundamentalists" - And? They basically do the same thing but not because of religion. For example the article mentioned that they have a lot of unsecured guns/weapons in the house around the children, we criticise fundamentalists for this (my husband is from the "Bible Belt" full of religious gun nuts) so why is it OK when these people do it?