And by the BBC which gives it an independence the photo didn’t have.Notice it was done in front of the daffodils too so people wouldn’t say ‘this could have been recorded any time’ etc etc
And by the BBC which gives it an independence the photo didn’t have.Notice it was done in front of the daffodils too so people wouldn’t say ‘this could have been recorded any time’ etc etc
Tbf they've lied about worse ... that's all I'm sayingthat's pretty poor taste- why would someone lie about having cancer ffs
What would make you happy? Her dead body paraded up to your front door. You are a ghoul.Tbf they've lied about worse ... that's all I'm saying
And she fiddles with her hands to make sure everyone could see the bloody ring.And by the BBC which gives it an independence the photo didn’t have.
Likely that they mean adjuvant chemotherapy rather than 'preventative'.Is preventative chemotherapy what chemotherapy normally is? I’m not sure on the distinction being made, if any
And people believe this? the same PR team with all those photoshopped posts ! OK cool, but also Prince Andrew doesn't sweat either? Right ?
[/QUOT
Yes most people are notAnd people believe this? the same PR team with all those photoshopped posts ! OK cool, but also Prince Andrew doesn't sweat either? Right ?
What an obnoxious loon you areThey should have told the truth from the start instead they chose to stay silent while the whole world was getting scammed by them.
There's no way to know. Likely it's adjuvant, we don't know what margins they had on whatever they removed (critical on deciding whether we're labelling it as 'cancer free').Apologies if this has been asked because the thread is moving so quickly but am I right in the understanding that: Kate said in the video that cancer had been present and is now undertaking a course of preventative chemotherapy. Does that mean that the main cancer/tumor would have been removed and she would currently be showing as NED (no evidence of disease) and the chemo is to eradicate any microscopic cancer cells that may still be left in the body? Is that to say that she doesn’t currently have cancer? I’m not sure if I’m making sense but the wording can be ambiguous. Not that it makes much difference to me as the Joe Public but wondering if that means she is currently really labelled as currently ‘having cancer’ ?
Exactly. Did the American talk show host that was laughing about her marriage and husband cheating care about her? Absolutely not. People were looking for a laugh and to make money.They weren't worried for her. They were concern trolling to try and apply pressure.
Good on Rose Hanbury for serving papers to Stephen Colbert. Absolute grifter dragging her and her friend's marriage through the mud to try and be relevant again.Exactly. Did the American talk show host that was laughing about her marriage and husband cheating care about her? Absolutely not. People were looking for a laugh and to make money.
This is the one I watched announcing her diagnosis:Apologies if this has been asked because the thread is moving so quickly but am I right in the understanding that: Kate said in the video that cancer had been present and is now undertaking a course of preventative chemotherapy. Does that mean that the main cancer/tumor would have been removed and she would currently be showing as NED (no evidence of disease) and the chemo is to eradicate any microscopic cancer cells that may still be left in the body? Is that to say that she doesn’t currently have cancer? I’m not sure if I’m making sense but the wording can be ambiguous. Not that it makes much difference to me as the Joe Public but wondering if that means she is currently really labelled as currently ‘having cancer’ ?
Would love if she won a load of money. I don’t think William or Kate really care to go after things like that.Good on Rose Hanbury for serving papers to Stephen Colbert. Absolute grifter dragging her and her friend's marriage through the mud to try and be relevant again.