Exactly. And so, in that sense, it is a big deal, and KP showed arrogance and incompetence in trying to pass the photo off.It’s their reputation at stake. Yes, in the general scheme of things is not really that important … a family photo tweaked to give a glossier picture … but they are dealing with all kinds of photographs from terrorist events to war photos. Getting a reputation for allowing edited/manipulated images isn’t something they would want. Some things are actually bigger than the RF and their PR games.
Hmmm for ordinary kids I'd say sure, but these kids have been trained from the crib to pose, walk and smile and wave at the right time. Add that trianing to their ages, and yes they are absolutely old enough to stay still for photos.I’d be more surprised if the photo wasn’t edited. Do you know how hard it is to even get one child to stay still and smile nicely?! It’s likely a mash up photo which is why it’s a bit off, it’s not a good look but I do get it.
Agreed, and so for me it comes down to, why did they feel the need to send this pic out to the global news agencies? Normally they would reserve that for breaking news. What story were they trying to get ahead of?From what I can gather, and I might have hold of the wrong end of the stick, the mistake they made was sending it to the news agencies who have a policy for what is acceptable editing, and who fact check. If they had just left it to be picked up from their Instagram account and bypassed the agencies it wouldn‘t have come up.
Exactly! Has anyone considered that KP are fed up with the conspiracy clamour from people who can't cope with a simple timetable (screeching arewethereyet? arewethereyet? in the back seat of the car) and have decided to troll them with a bit of bad photoshop. They might be tittering into their fine china teacups right now.We were told that she would be back to work at Easter, yet everyone clamouring for photos and updates constantly. This is what happens when nobody wants to give the woman some space to recuperate from an operation.
Well really this is what happens when you send edited photographs to global news agencies who have a policy of checking and not using edited photographs.We were told that she would be back to work at Easter, yet everyone clamouring for photos and updates constantly. This is what happens when nobody wants to give the woman some space to recuperate from an operation.
hmmm I wonder??The big question is who noticed first, the news agencies or Tattle?
I read the Royal photos / speeches are taken well in advance of publication .View attachment 2808113
It was probably a picture from December 2023, but with everything going on they decided to photoshop it to make it look like it was taken on a different day. Not a very smart decision from their end, since everyone puts everything they do under a loop. However, people just need to have some patience. They said she'll make an appearance again on Easter, which is just three weeks away.
Wow children wearing the same clothes twice! (but not exactly the same!)View attachment 2808113
It was probably a picture from December 2023, but with everything going on they decided to photoshop it to make it look like it was taken on a different day. Not a very smart decision from their end, since everyone puts everything they do under a loop. However, people just need to have some patience. They said she'll make an appearance again on Easter, which is just three weeks away.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?