There is a sort of joke that America has a coronation every 4 years, because of the cost, pomp and ceremony of having a new president.But I suppose I wonder what's the alternative? Is it any better? If it was a republic with a ceremonial elected Head of State like Ireland the tax payer would fund them. If it was a republic with an elected political head of state like the USA the tax payer would fund them.
Edited to add: I think about this as an Australian given it's likely we'll have another referendum eventually to decide whether to become a Republic. I think I'd prefer the Irish?
I’ve yet to see an alternative that I personally agree would be better value for the country. We would have to pay for something else. As long as they continue charity work (UK Royals do a lot more than the other Royal Families), as long as they carry on recognising members of society through the Garden Parties and OBE’s etc (again something they do a lot more than any other royal family) and as long as Charles opens up the monarchy I don’t think they’re a massive harm.
The fact is that in a society like ours there are hierarchies , and getting rid of the Windsors would just mean replacing them with another that has far less interest for international politics and travel.
I think either The Queen or Price Phillip had Bowel cancer because Deborah James (Bowel Babe) got a huge offline donation the day she met Prince William and received her OBE and I personally believe it was a donation from the whole Royal Family as a mark of respect for whichever of them had it.My Aged Relatives are convinced she had bowel cancer … chemo for that doesn’t mean hair loss and it would fit with the going in for tests in October.
I base this on absolutely nothing other than the fact the donation was anonymous and he went out of his way to give it to her in person and the donation was the same day.