It’s a strange mix of freedom and restriction, isnt it.The thing is, if you are in it, you probably don't know any different. Kates family come from a background where they can see the privileges the RF have. How many people really gave a choice in what they do? Choices depend on opportunities. The Royals can choose what they want to do, because they can go to Cambridge despite mediocre A Level results like Charles, get some teacher to do their coursework for them like Harry, walk into dome plush job with 200 days holiday a year like Beatrice. That's quite attractive. I do think Charlite and Louis should not be working Royals and should be told so from now, because it is a toxic system to have them being effectively more and more useless as time goes on.
I remember the furore when Edward decided that a Military life wasn’t for him (which actually must have taken great strength of character)… how could the child of the Monarch not want to serve their country and have access to the biggest, shiniest dressing up box ever!? Especially when there is his brother as a shining beacon of military service.
Fast forward 30odd years and I doubt you would find many prepared to say that a stint in the navy made Andrew a ‘better’ royal.
I know someone who called their daughter Catherine (this is going back 40 or so years) because it could be friendly and approachable (Cate). Be Cathy for family and as a little girl and then Catherine when she grew up and wanted to be professional. She’s now 40 and Cath to everybody.Her uncle in an interview also referred to her as Kate. Personally I see it no difference to someone called Kate putting Catherine on their CV when applying for a job or somesuch.