Looks like they’re on a freebie in London for an ‘exciting’ project.
How does she know Bonnie or Archie won't present with SEN issues when older?! I hate when people say they are the 'lucky ones' because they don't have any disabled children...my daughter is disabled and I feel like the luckiest woman alive that I get to be her mummy we have a pretty normal family life.Sue's doing an AMA and said none of the children have SEN or any issues. They are also going on several holidays this summer so it'll be interesting to see if they are declared or not.
Surely thats against the law if she's acting like they pay for them themselves by booking the flights and where they're staying?She side stepped the question about how they afford all their holidays. Saying they book flights in advance and stay in villas
Yes, as if booking your own flights suddenly makes taking 20 people very affordable to Florida when you earn £50k.She side stepped the question about how they afford all their holidays. Saying they book flights in advance and stay in villas
I found this so weird!! She’s definitely talked about Max/Casper before! Forgotten what she’s made up in the past?Sue's doing an AMA and said none of the children have SEN or any issues. They are also going on several holidays this summer so it'll be interesting to see if they are declared or not.
It’s called freebies and collaborations and adverts.They’re definitely making a lot of money from vlogging. They’ve just had the dining room done, they did a new bathroom in the basement. Sue is constantly buying the kids new holiday clothes (see latest vlog) and they’ve got a few more holidays booked.
They can’t possibly afford it all on Noel’s salary alone.
She really doesn’t like people being aware that they rely on tax credits and the huge boost a disabled child can get you. She’s trying to deflect speculation so her fans all go, no Sue doesn’t claim that.I found this so weird!! She’s definitely talked about Max/Casper before! Forgotten what she’s made up in the past?
Edit: found it really easily!!!
Looks like she’s deleted that question now from her stories!I found this so weird!! She’s definitely talked about Max/Casper before! Forgotten what she’s made up in the past?
Edit: found it really easily!!!
None of the influencers and blaggers really do stick to ASA guidelines and nothing happens.I used to think that Sue just wasn't that intelligent, but several times she has blatantly lied about things. On one of the KAC she said she was 14 and Noel 16 when they had Chris. Noel was nearly 19! The pair of them are very business savvy, I'm sure they don't miss a thing but still try to put themselves forward as 'paying their own way'.
I don't know how they get away with not adhering to the ASA guidelines, I'll be watching the holiday posts carefully.
Oh My Goodness Greywolf do you honestly see a disabled child as a huge boost and what it can get you,It’s called freebies and collaborations and adverts.
She really doesn’t like people being aware that they rely on tax credits and the huge boost a disabled child can get you. She’s trying to deflect speculation so her fans all go, no Sue doesn’t claim that.
It’s all crap. And they have a daughter (Tillie or Millie or Ellie or Hallie one of the ‘llie’ Girls) has had multiple operations on her leg and i would imagine she qualifies for support.
Deflect, deny, live off those tax credits and get free holidays instead of payment. Vlogs don’t earn the amounts they are living off, they are not particularly high views or popular. They are also really quite tit vlogs to watch.
I do agree they are probably only claiming what they are entitled to, but I think its a bit of a piss take that they were able to have so many kids because of things like child benefits/tax credits. (Especially when I think they already had 5 or 6 before they started the pie business) No way would they have had so many if they'd had the claiming for two kids rule back then.Oh My Goodness Greywolf do you honestly see a disabled child as a huge boost and what it can get you,
I am sure if the any of the Radford Children are getting support then they will only be getting what they are entitled to.
I do see your point Mayday also Greywolf has a point, I just dont agree that Disabled Children are a huge boost to a families income.I do agree they are probably only claiming what they are entitled to, but I think its a bit of a piss take that they were able to have so many kids because of things like child benefits/tax credits. (Especially when I think they already had 5 or 6 before they started the pie business) No way would they have had so many if they'd had the claiming for two kids rule back then.
I have no issue with them claiming their entitlement at all! Of course the children should get what they deserve. We are discussing their shady disclosure and incomeOh My Goodness Greywolf do you honestly see a disabled child as a huge boost and what it can get you,
I am sure if the any of the Radford Children are getting support then they will only be getting what they are entitled to.