May I suggest doing some research into Chris Ingham
I dunno, Noel actually did sleep with a young girl. Chris only allegedly did it but thats a whole other thread.May I suggest doing some research into Chris Ingham
The Radford’s are problematic but I don’t think they come close to the Ingham shitshow.
Very true very true. They’ve had a lot of scandals to follow though as well. I just really dislike them but yeah, a whole different thread
Believe Me i Have been following that shower of shite since I had the Misfortune to read about him while I was in Florida funnily enough - my interest peeked as I knew their name from my young granddaughter who I knew liked to watch them, she was soon ripped off their channel, and I have been an avid hater ever since, It was the Radford lot I didn’t know had a channelMay I suggest doing some research into Chris Ingham
The Radford’s are problematic but I don’t think they come close to the Ingham shitshow.
My kids do secret Santa at school. Obviously the presents were quarantined for a few days before being handed out at their party. Why do you keep going back to referring to her x friends? No one has mentioned that for absolutely ages! It’s pointless on your behalf. Just makes you look like you are taking digs at certain Tattlers!! Not cool!!!
Ah I misread your initial post and thought you were a fan
Radford’s vlogs are possibly the worst you’ll watch. Awful quality, everyone talking over everyone, Sue starting every single clip with “so”, the most robotic sponsored content ever. Wouldn’t waste my time if I were you To be fair Chris can edit, they have content and personality.Ah I misread your initial post and thought you were a fan
I just have them on ignore, its their problem not mine.
That person literally wrote a post about her talking to Sue last year about secret santa. There are multiple posts in this thread by her mentioning friendship, ex friendship, the stalking, calling the cops on each other, etc. It's not been"absolutely ages". I'm certainly taking digs at it. It's not cool to be a psycho ex friend stalker. It's deeply concerning. I don't know any sane person who spends huge amounts of their free time keeping up with and talking about an ex friend.
I don't think he's required to be in the media spotlight if he doesn't want it. Still, it's his child. Decent people will do whatever they can for their child. He's obviously a POS. I don't cut him any slack. He chose to have unprotected sex. He knows he has a child. He chooses to have nothing to do with that child.We’re talking about 18yr old kids here. Even if he did want to be involved he probably doesn’t want the whole media spotlight and who can blame him? If he and Millie could arrange something privately that was “off camera” maybe he’d be more inclined. None of us know the story so maybe we should just cut him some slack?
Honestly no one has said anything for ages. It’s you who seems to be obsessed. If you’ve an issue with a Tattler can I suggest you either DM them or put them on silent? Your rants are really starting to grate
Plenty of people saw that crazed one post just a page ago that she was talking to Sue last year about this and that Sue stole her idea. She said it multiple times. I'm not even going to go back to all the times she droned on and on about calling the cops, having the cops called, called The Sun (and that's just in this iteration of the thread, which did not start "ages" ago). On these threads we talk about the Radfords and others in their orbit. If a poster wants to make herself part of the Radford orbit over and over and over again, multiple pages in a row in the same thread, then that's her choice. We've seen the evidence that the Radfords attract crazy. Someone just pointed out the Inghams.Honestly no one has said anything for ages. It’s you who seems to be obsessed. If you’ve an issue with a Tattler can I suggest you either DM them or put them on silent? Your rants are really starting to grate
In fact I’m enjoying this thread just now it WAS going well This is all correct.Just to clear things up what she said was true. She wasn’t trying to be part of her “orbit” why would anyone actually want anything to do with those crettins? You need to make your mind up! One minute you are actively defending them, next running them into the ground, it’s laughable. There’s been some rather suspicious goings on of late (well a couple of weeks ago) why wouldn’t she get pissed off? If someone who’s not been seen since had a username with your street address?! That’s seriously creepy! I’m certainly no part of anyone’s “orbit”
You should change your name to SpeakerOfTruth
Sorry not to get involved but we all know Sue obviously reads here, she knows certain members are old friends of hers... I bet she is LOVING the fact that the 'old friends' constantly post about her while she seems to not have a care in the world. Your just making her feel more important than she is. 
No offence to anyone ... Happy Christmas 
But she does care! Because she’s posted stuff on her InstagramYou should change your name to SpeakerOfTruth
They should just use the ignore button like I have!But she does care! Because she’s posted stuff on her Instagram
Personally I can’t be arsed with it but I’m not gonna sit and watch a mate be made a fool of by that!
Hi Sue 🥱🥱🥱🥱
It is pitiful and shambolic the amount of money they spend and so much of it on rubbish. Those children's lives could be enhanced in a more positive way if spare money was saved and invested in a useful hobby or activity that the kids enjoy and they could make new friends. Obviously with covid that isn't possible atm but if they actually saved during this time imagine how much money they'd have in 6 months time. They must be rolling in it particularly if Noel can take Christmas eve off work at this busy time.....news flash people do actually work on their birthdays regardless of age...Just caught up on the 'Secret Santa' greed fest. Wtf was that all about?! Are they really that desperate for vlog content?
They clearly don't understand what secret santa is. If it's to be done before Christmas, in an group such as work colleagues or course mates etc, it's a token gift (usually £5, definitely no more than £10), often with a theme. If done in families, especially large ones like theirs, it's usually in place of presents for all, due to the expensive nature of buying for everyone in a large family. Granted the budget is much higher, and presents more serious/catered for that person, but that's because that's all that person is getting that year from family. And, by nature of the experience (only gifts they're getting from family), they tend to be opened on Christmas day itself.
There's absolutely no point spending the extortionate amount they did on each other, shopping en mass during a pandemic, opening them a week or so before Christmas, only to repeat the process again on Friday when they all receive a massive stash of presents each (not to mention the Christmas Eve tit that'll come before). It's total indulgence. Loads of new clothes for secret Santa? 5 or 6 new toys for a 3 year old (Archie), just a week before Christmas? (That he just threw on the floor anyway).
Then they revealed who they bought for anyway straight afterwards. It's called SECRET Santa you morons!(I know many struggle to keep it secret anyway, so it might leak out, but I've never seen people sit around straight after opening and literally reveal one by one who they bought for. What was the point in that?!
With so many little ones involved, it's was mainly just the adults/older kids buying multiple presents anyway, saying it's from whoever, when the under 5s clearly couldn't give a tit.
What about the older boys? I get them not wanting to be on camera but it seemed like the rules of this secret Santa were you could only take part and buy and receive a present if you open it on camera. No mention of anyone buying for, or receiving from Josh, James, Luke, Jack, Daniel etc. Unless they did their own, off screen, secret Santa between themselves?
The whole thing was just pure indulgent crap. You can tell they're also not use to buying for each other as the middle ones (Max, Tillie, Oscar, Casper etc) seemed to find it a really novel experience actually going out and choosing a gift for someone, which is quite sad if they've got to that age without having experienced the joy of picking out a gift for someone before. They're clearly just use to a massive stash of birthday and Christmas presents from mum and dad (or everyone), rather than receiving presents from each other. In the future, it might be a nice tradition to keep, to get them involved in the giving side of Christmas and thinking about a specific sibling and what they might like, but the budget was way too high and it seemed a bit odd (to me) to include the tiny ones who are too young to shop themselves and will get plenty on the day anyway. If it was up to me, I'd make it an age 7 and up thing you do once the little ones are in bed. Just seemed really pointless including them when they had no concept of how to take part properly and needed other people to do the shopping for them. Then, if done off camera later in the evening, it could have included all the older ones, rather than just those who want to be on camera, to make it a true family tradition. It was clearly just for vlog content and, of course, the tiny ones were always going to take priority over the older lads.
There is no mind to make up. One can express honesty at the same time they are criticizing. There's no need to lie. Like I tell kids, dishonesty is so bleeping crappy (well, obviously I use better language lol). Sometimes criticism can be dishonest. Sometimes parts of a conversation can be dishonest.Just to clear things up what she said was true. She wasn’t trying to be part of her “orbit” why would anyone actually want anything to do with those crettins? You need to make your mind up! One minute you are actively defending them, next running them into the ground, it’s laughable. There’s been some rather suspicious goings on of late (well a couple of weeks ago) why wouldn’t she get pissed off? If someone who’s not been seen since had a username with your street address?! That’s seriously creepy! I’m certainly no part of anyone’s “orbit”
I could see that Sue absolutely thrives off the fact that she's got an ex friend spending all her days talking about her. She loves attention but seems to especially love negative attention. It makes her feel like some sort of martyr and she can rile up her minions which gives her more attention and more of a high and it's a never ending cycle.You should change your name to SpeakerOfTruth
