She is no victim....let's see when the money runs out who she goes after next ......It’s a bit early in the day to start victim blaming, so I’ll leave you to it. Also not really the thread for it.
She is no victim....let's see when the money runs out who she goes after next ......It’s a bit early in the day to start victim blaming, so I’ll leave you to it. Also not really the thread for it.
And it's the anniversary of several royal events. The official mourning period didn't end until January, lent and easter cuts out Feb 22nd - April 10th, and then Eurovision next week!Because they didn’t want it near the Queens coronation date of June, and the UK is hosting various major events throughout this month already which puts pressure on policing. Not everything is a conspiracy about Harry and Meghan.
I wonder if Zara and Mike are out again tonight.. they were out until 2am yesterday! They must have been shattered with the early startI bet William has his arm around Zara/Mike/ Eugenie/Beatrice right now saying you're not like my brother I love you
The official mourning period for the royal family end a week after the Queens funeral.....And it's the anniversary of several royal events. The official mourning period didn't end until January, lent and easter cuts out Feb 22nd - April 10th, and then Eurovision next week!
It also needs to be before trooping the colour in June.. can't have the king's official birthday if he isn't properly crowned yet!
I thought that too but i heard it was four months.The official mourning period for the royal family end a week after the Queens funeral.....
Charles set the time frameI thought that too but i heard it was four months.
Just looked it up, George V and VI had mourning periods of four months each
yes I know, I already said I thought that was the caseCharles set the time frame
The thing a lot of these people don’t seem to get is Diana was a big supporter of the monarchy, she wanted her son to be king and would more than likely have had a great seat at todays coronation and been on her 2nd or 3rd marriage. People use her as the face of a republican movement which is so far from what she believed in she’d probably find it offensive. It’s a shame she never got to have her happy ending but an act of tragedy doesn’t mean Charles shouldn’t have had his.Oh gosh I’ve seen this on my timeline as well!
View attachment 2153251
absolute madness! They were divorced! I really like Diana, I find her interesting, but she was never going to be happy with Charles having a mistress and when Charles and Camilla reunited he was never going to give her up. Their divorce was probably the best thing that happened to her (apart from her sons obviously) and it’s a shame she died so soon after.
Victoria mourned Albert until her death & wore black every day after his death even to her son's wedding.....yes I know, I already said I thought that was the case
I'm just saying historically monarchs have been mourned for months. Or years in Victoria's case lol
She grew up on the Sandringham estate, played with Andrew and Edward and called the Queen Aunt LilibetThe thing a lot of these people don’t seem to get is Diana was a big supporter of the monarchy, she wanted her son to be king and would more than likely have had a great seat at todays coronation and been on her 2nd or 3rd marriage. People use her as the face of a republican movement which is so far from what she believed in she’d probably find it offensive. It’s a shame she never got to have her happy ending but an act of tragedy doesn’t mean Charles shouldn’t have had his.
The only grotty person in that fiasco is Andrew. If he wasn’t an unapologetic friend with a convicted pedophile and hadn’t had sex with a trafficked teenager then none of this would have happened.Grotty ?
So is the person that went after money from his knowing out late Queen would make him pay it ............money over justice in a criminal trail ......
---
Very sad, although I find it strange how she made her youngest daughter Beatrice wear Albert's night shirt and Victoria would cuddle and smell her in it! She was only around 4 or 5. The rest of Beatrice's childhood was spent in this bubble of mourning.Victoria mourned Albert until her death & wore black every day after his death even to her son's wedding.....
He behaved appallingly. As he had trade links to the US he blindsided Epstein's unhealthy nature. Andrew's perspective was that Epstein provided all these links. He was too daft to realiseThe only grotty person in that fiasco is Andrew. If he wasn’t an unapologetic friend with a convicted pedophile and hadn’t had sex with a trafficked teenager then none of this would have happened.
I’ve seen some people genuinely believe she grew up impoverished and the reason the RF didn’t like her was because she was common. The founder of her noble house was knighted by Henry VIII and her families royal connections in the past 500 years have been on par with Charles, but somehow people are genuinely out here thinking she had no clue about the aristocrat lifestyle and was just a normal girl.She grew up on the Sandringham estate, played with Andrew and Edward and called the Queen Aunt Lilibet
i wish i was that commonI’ve seen some people genuinely believe she grew up impoverished and the reason the RF didn’t like her was because she was common. The founder of her noble house was knighted by Henry VIII and her families royal connections in the past 500 years have been on par with Charles, but somehow people are genuinely out here thinking she had no clue about the aristocrat lifestyle and was just a normal girl.
She was Lady Diana before her marriage wasn't she? I think people get confused by her working as some kind of child minder - that's not a job you associate with the wealthy and privileged.I’ve seen some people genuinely believe she grew up impoverished and the reason the RF didn’t like her was because she was common. The founder of her noble house was knighted by Henry VIII and her families royal connections in the past 500 years have been on par with Charles, but somehow people are genuinely out here thinking she had no clue about the aristocrat lifestyle and was just a normal girl.
yes, but she didn't become a lady until she was 13/14. That's when her father became Earl.She was Lady Diana before her marriage wasn't she? I think people get confused by her working as some kind of child minder - that's not a job you associate with the wealthy and privileged.
Yes! She has Anne’s sass too which I love!I think Charlotte will be very much like Anne, so supportive