Love it. I'd appreciate the link too. Thinking of getting one for my daughter for Christmas, would a S fit a size 10 woman? I know the official ones are very big fitting, was wondering if AliExpress ones were the same, one I'd seen seemed the opposite so want to make sure.Photo dump of my AliExpress cardigan, size S. It's very dark today, so apologies for the bad photos (photos with it worn are closer to real colour).
For reference, I am 1,58m (5'2") tall.
As I said before, it is super soft and cosy, definitely worth it.
View attachment 2550632View attachment 2550633View attachment 2550634View attachment 2550636View attachment 2550637
I got a large one as a 16 and it’s still loose on me, didn’t want it too oversized. The shop I bought mine on had measurements on so that helpedLove it. I'd appreciate the link too. Thinking of getting one for my daughter for Christmas, would a S fit a size 10 woman? I know the official ones are very big fitting, was wondering if AliExpress ones were the same, one I'd seen seemed the opposite so want to make sure.
Mine is a medium and it's very generous.Love it. I'd appreciate the link too. Thinking of getting one for my daughter for Christmas, would a S fit a size 10 woman? I know the official ones are very big fitting, was wondering if AliExpress ones were the same, one I'd seen seemed the opposite so want to make sure.
Sorry to go back to an old thread. But is there any source for this? I can't find it other than random posts on social media of people claiming Jack said that with nothing to actually back it up.I’ve actually just read Jack officially commented that Olivia’s team instigated the royalties talks and Taylor and him had no involvement. So it’s more of a non-issue?
I’m not sure if Jack actually said that, or if it’s just one of those made up things on social media.Sorry to go back to an old thread. But is there any source for this? I can't find it other than random posts on social media of people claiming Jack said that with nothing to actually back it up.
That whole situation seems to have so much misinformation surrounding it.
Jack's been uncharacteristically vague about it, and other people have done heavy lifting to fill in the blanks.
Sorry I just saw that he was talking about one step forward, three steps back here!Sorry to go back to an old thread. But is there any source for this? I can't find it other than random posts on social media of people claiming Jack said that with nothing to actually back it up.
That whole situation seems to have so much misinformation surrounding it.
Jack's been uncharacteristically vague about it, and other people have done heavy lifting to fill in the blanks.
Most of the tour dates have only had one SN song.Been to see Era tour at the cinema tonight. Really enjoyed it. But why did she only sing one song from speak now
I think Jack's hinted that he wasn't directly involved with deja vu, but that's pretty obvious as teams acting on behalf of Jack and Taylor would do the "negotiating" in the background for them. Taylor will obviously never say anything about it.I’m not sure if Jack actually said that, or if it’s just one of those made up things on social media.
I think what actually happened is Olivia blabbed too much about how the song was inspired by Taylor, which caused either Taylor’s or Olivia’s legal team to step in handle the situation.
I don’t think Olivia had the proper media training or legal training to realise she shouldn’t have directly said that Cruel Summer inspired Deja vu or that New Year’s Day inspired one step forward, three steps back.
I was there too! Even realised the date was a 13 (2+11)I saw Fall Out Boy last night and had been deluding myself for months that she might pop up and sing Electric Touch with them like she has at other o2 shows
sadly it was not to be. I blame Travis
I’m surprised Taylor can get away with ‘when Emma falls in love’ as to me it sounds so similar to ‘drops of jupitar’ by train. She’d even covered that song on Speak Now tourI think Jack's hinted that he wasn't directly involved with deja vu, but that's pretty obvious as teams acting on behalf of Jack and Taylor would do the "negotiating" in the background for them. Taylor will obviously never say anything about it.
It still seems crazy to me that the delivery of two lines that's somewhat similar means that Jack and Taylor get 50% of the royalties and most probably made more money from that track than Olivia did. Nihil sub sole novum and all that. It's hard for any new song to not have similarities to a handful of other ones and some (awful and totally out of their depth) judges have made terrible rulings in recent years which have opened up the floodgates.
Similarly I don't think Taylor should have given right said fred a song writing credit, but she understands the world and wanted to pre-empt it after the blurred lines and shape of you issues. There's a handful of other songs Look also shares similarities with - like that peaches track and one of avril's best damn thing tracks.
Gigi and Selena. Interesting on lots of levels.out with the girls last night
If I was Taylor I’d avoid being papped with Taylor just for a secGigi and Selena. Interesting on lots of levels.
Is she paying Kesha royalties for Suburban Legends?I’m surprised Taylor can get away with ‘when Emma falls in love’ as to me it sounds so similar to ‘drops of jupitar’ by train. She’d even covered that song on Speak Now tour
These kind of photos are the ones that makes me think Taylor (Tree) calls and pays the paps.out with the girls last night
She might call them but there’s no way she’s paying them. The paps make so much money from Taylor. They would be running to wherever she is to get a photo.These kind of photos are the ones that makes me think Taylor (Tree) calls and pays the paps.
Like Gigi had the hair on her face, Selena looks like my Gran holding her bag in public. But Taylor looks stunning.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?