I bought her concealer and it smelt like play dough. Never bought anything again.That palette was CHRONIC. She was talking about how buttery it was and it was literally like chalk, no pigment and so much fallout.Oh my god that just brought back a repressed memoryshe was aggressively digging the brush into the pan and dragging it across her face
Beauty Bay Palettes are unreal. I couldn't believe how bad the reviews online were of her palettes. Shall we even bring up her attempt at a clothing line
I bought the leather jacket and love itShall we even bring up her attempt at a clothing line
trying to be like Pippa but tried too much too soon.. Pippa started off with jeans and then branched out.. she throws everything out at once and hopes for the best there can’t possibly be any more lash styles left to launch at this stage she’s done them all dont be silly, we will have the full lash range “remastered” and relaunched!Omg her clothing line too... #NeverForget
What in the name of all things sacred is that thingNever forget
Why would she take abuse ?
Just because they aren’t kissing her ass doesn’t always constitute as giving abuse either though. That’s the problem. They feel any criticism is abuse when most of the time it’s for accountability purposes. I 100% believe that if it’s abuse of course they have every right to block and delete comments. However, from reading this thread there have been a lot of people getting blocked by her for barely giving an opinion.
I’m inclined to disagree. I’ll be honest and say I never followed or heard of Keilidh until the Urban Bible palette but it seems she was being flooded with questions about the re-release and explained her side. She didn’t bash Sue at all and even said she looked up to her as a woman in the industry. I don’t think it was opportunistic, but a professional response to being let down by a collaborator when she put a lot of work into it.
much did she actually invest? So Sue took all the risk I’d imagine .
Keilidh said herself she had an input on the formula, the shades, the packaging and even a video shared a few pages back shows a demo of Keilidh and Sue with the palette and Sue saying “it was all you though!”. So Keilidh did have an input. Sure, it wasn’t her brand on the line but I could understand how disappointing it is to, as she put it, have her input discredited by not being given a heads up about the product being relaunched without her name on it. Sur would legally have the intellectual property rights to the product once the contract ended, but for someone that harps on about being kind and supporting women, especially women in business, it would have been more professional and wiser of her from a PR perspective to consult with Keilidh about the decision to relaunch the palette, or approach her with a proposal of relaunching the collaboration with her name on it. I don’t think Keilidh was being manipulative, and I also think it was a very big mistake on Sue’s part but likely with no hard feelings. It is a crappy situation that I hope future collaborators can learn from should they enter a contract with the brand, or for Sue to communicate with her collaborators better about her intentions once the contract ends. From what Keilidh said, there was no word from the brand to her on any intentions on keeping the product in their line or releasing again at a later stage.
I disagree. Keilidh had a reputational risk. Ireland is a small country with a long memory. She'd always be known as the girl who had a palette with sosue that flopped
she paid so much for her new face that she wants to loo at it from ALL the angles.
Will it be a “game changer “?
I genuinely don't think Sue would even be able to formulate a toasted sandwich!!Oh my god that just brought back a repressed memory
