Imagine, as a DV charity, thinking that it's all good to lie about donating to a DV charity for years, personally pocket at least tens of thousands (if not hundreds of thousands) of dollars that were intended for that charity, stonewalling those who attempted to reveal said deception with legal threats, and then finally when she had to have those claims mediated through a legal process, producing a couple of receipts to show donations that only occurred after she had been called into question.
Oh yes...that definitely counts as that matter having "been resolved". Well, the matter may have been resolved legally, but the stain on her character has not, given that she has never publically admitted or apologised for the deception.
Oh yes...that definitely counts as that matter having "been resolved". Well, the matter may have been resolved legally, but the stain on her character has not, given that she has never publically admitted or apologised for the deception.