Sorry, I just couldn’t resist phrasing it that waySo sorry for misgendering you, Dog Granger!!
I'm guessing you mean a female dog and not, you know, a witch. What's Dog Granger every done to you?
She’s by far the least offensive family member, and she’s clearly much loved and well taken care of, so I don’t really even feel sorry for her. (This is assuming she’s not subjected to Rootabaga’s content.)I agree that she seems to have a good life, assuming Ruby doesn't cook meals for her.Sorry, I just couldn’t resist phrasing it that way
I wonder if someone is sitting in the front passenger seat or if she insists on sitting in the back to get the real "mom still drives me around" feel
Back to exter to print and get her dissertation ready to hand in is my guess
Believe it or not, Bones is Ruby's real surname! 'Mother Granger' is named because that's the name she uses on Instagram.Sorry for the question out of the blue but why is her dad being called "daddy bones" ? I'd love to know the reference/reason - it's really funny
Cold spaghetti in the car? bleeping hell just go tescos and get a meal deal lad
And the daddy bit … let’s just say that people got a bit thirsty at the height of lockdown. It was not our proudest moment.
Ruby's clearly found a method that no wine taster has ever stumbled upon, though: Push all liquid to the front of your mouth and chew it - do not let any of it touch the rest of your tongue. This method of activating her keenly-attuned tea enthusiast senses led her to deduce that BARD 'n' BLAND's blueberry and peach tea tastes like blueberry and smells like peach. It's also "PARPLE".
Perhaps one of the most shocking moments in the whole time I've been on the group. It wasn't the best moment, I thankfully never succumbed to appeal of Daddy Bones as other than being a bit gay, the fact that he is realted to ruby is enough to put me off. I do wonder what he's like, he's a bit of a man of mystery and how does he fit within the Granger family?
When your custom character is in a cutscene
Feeling like a #thicko right now.
to me it just looks like she's rewriting whatever the previous researcher saidTalking of dissertations, this screenshot from @gossip_guy's post clarifies nothing.
It was COMMON for his gifts to function outside of the dialogue of 'ordinary letters'.
I haven't a clue what this means. Maybe I'm being dense, but how did his letters transcend 'ordinary' letter writing and why are his letters still being referred to as 'gifts' rather than, idk, correspondence? I think it's a massive mistake to shoehorn Lewis Carroll's letters (literary subject) into theories of gift-giving (anthropological subject).
In other words, the essay itself still depends on letters being dialogical for the most part.
The point is that Lewis Carroll's letters were mostly 'in dialogue' with others rather than being a private journal? Sooo, his letters were letters and not diaries (because they are diaries)?
But the 'three kinds of letters which are different from dialogical letters' apparently fit into the definition of non-ordinary letters. And then the notes go on to say that Carroll's letters were mostly dialogical. But the first point says that it was common for them to function outside the dialogue of 'ordinary letters'. Which one is it? And why does it matter?
Expectation that people will reply but this doesn't always happen in practise.
Well, duh. Why is this a dissertation?
I don't mean this to come across as anti-intellectual, and don't want to undermine anyone's area/s of research, but this just sounds like pointless waffling jargon to me.
View attachment 1224480
Doesn’t her Dad look a little like John Lennon? If so, I really hope she wasn’t trying to draw a picture of her dad
Interesting, the book on literary dedications gets slammed on Goodreads for citing Wikipedia in every paragraph: https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/22208451-once-again-to-zelda A great work to cite in your dissertation, then.
