Am in company but
yes
1. RD hasn’t been mentioned for a while in either a negative or positive way
2.Able enough to deflect with her long mould thread.
3. Mould thread itself includes lots of arguments about porridge and blankets and bleach
4. Not mentioned kids much
5. 5 hour conversation about getting her van back
she is just never consistent
Which is why I think benefits compliance.
1. Don't mention RD because him 'living completely separately on the driveway', bringing back food from work and spending so much time together would be interpreted as living together and sharing finances.
2. Because there is nothing else to talk about to represent the gaping hole in an online life caused by having to erase any mention of a partner, warble on about bleach and
tit.
3. Stop talking about trips out because that contradicts the content of a PIP claim in 'needing help to go out in familiar/unfamiliar places'. Can't say RD is there all the time and helps because of point #1.
4. Because of #1, difficult to claim needing help with personal care as RD isn't supposed to be there to provide it.
5. Because of the requirements for safeguarding, can't claim RBs (Roadside Brats) do it in case that flags up the inappropriate nature of their purported Young Carer role. The recent delirious sleep waffle seemed like it could solve the #3 issue, but then brings up the issues in this #5 - unattended children.
6. A compliance interview means they could (as they are allowed to do) be looking at her income and expenditure - lots of random gifts. Consistent with an online 'business'. Perhaps a separate account set up for donations and Amazon, which she hasn't declared, thinking they wouldn't be able to track it to her, but they've found it and are asking her to confirm all the email addresses she uses. She realises and thinks that by deleting it off her phone, she'll be able to deny it's hers. Unfortunately, she's deleted the admin account and probably didn't have a separate recovery email address to avoid the issue of it still being linked to her, which is why she can't recover the information.
7. She's pissed off enough people and been so noisy on SM/the media that somebody has worked out who she is from the word vomits and made a report of live in partner, undeclared income, etc, etc. No matter how careful people think are being, sooner or later they slip up and give enough detail to be able to identify themselves. Her voice would be one of those; it just takes somebody to have heard her, recognised her voice as that twatty woman from wherever, read the shite, see the offers of money and gifts and the amount that went into the fundraising, realise it doesn't match up with her official circumstances as claimed and then email a report.